IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i23-24p4890-4898.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Promoting continuity of care”—Specialist nurses’ role experiences in gynaecological oncology: A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Kobleder
  • Hanna Mayer
  • Larissa Gehrig
  • Beate Senn

Abstract

Aims and objectives To investigate the experiences of specialist nurses in Switzerland concerning their role of caring for women with gynaecological cancer. Background Women with gynaecological cancer often face complex situations, which require an integrative and quality‐assured approach by the healthcare system. Specialist nurses can play an important role in supporting these patients. However, in countries where the role of specialist nurses is at a developmental stage, their role lacks clarity. Design A qualitative descriptive design was chosen to gain insights into experiences of specialist nurses who care for women with gynaecological cancer. Methods We conducted three focus groups with 12 specialist nurses to access their experiences with regard to their role. Thematic qualitative text analysis was used to interpret the results. Results Divided into six main themes, the study results describe specialist nurses’ (1) current and (2) aspired role. (A) Counselling, (B) guidance, (C) key contact person and (D) team support are relevant themes in their current role. The themes (E) provision of resources and (F) extended knowledge are relevant to their aspired role. Within their current and aspired roles, the specialist nurses’ scope of practice is defined as “promoting continuity of care.” Conclusions The results indicate aspects of specialist nurses’ current and aspired roles. Detailed role descriptions and legal requirements are necessary to further support nurses towards an extended and specialised practice. In the context of gynaecological cancer survivors, services should be developed, where specialist nurses can play an important role in providing continuous care. Relevance to clinical practice To support implementation of specialist nursing in clinical practice, resources have to be mobilised and role descriptions should be provided. By creating an appropriate framework, the specialist nurse can turn into an important support for women with gynaecological cancer, in addition to current healthcare services.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Kobleder & Hanna Mayer & Larissa Gehrig & Beate Senn, 2017. "“Promoting continuity of care”—Specialist nurses’ role experiences in gynaecological oncology: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4890-4898, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:4890-4898
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13966
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13966
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13966?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ragnhild Johanne Tveit Sekse & Karl Ove Hufthammer & Margrethe Elin Vika, 2017. "Sexual activity and functioning in women treated for gynaecological cancers," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3-4), pages 400-410, February.
    2. Olivia Cook & Meredith McIntyre & Katrina Recoche, 2015. "Exploration of the role of specialist nurses in the care of women with gynaecological cancer: a systematic review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(5-6), pages 683-695, March.
    3. Ragnhild Johanne Tveit Sekse & Karl Ove Hufthammer & Margrethe Elin Vika, 2015. "Fatigue and quality of life in women treated for various types of gynaecological cancers: a cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3-4), pages 546-555, February.
    4. Chia‐Chen Hsieh & Chi‐An Chen & Fei‐Hsiu Hsiao & Shiow‐Ching Shun, 2014. "The correlations of sexual activity, sleep problems, emotional distress, attachment styles with quality of life: comparison between gynaecological cancer survivors and noncancer women," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(7-8), pages 985-994, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ragnhild Johanne Tveit Sekse & Gail Dunberger & Mette Linnet Olesen & Maria Østerbye & Lene Seibæk, 2019. "Lived experiences and quality of life after gynaecological cancer—An integrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1393-1421, May.
    2. Pär Salander & Joakim Isaksson & Brith Granström & Göran Laurell, 2016. "Motives that head and neck cancer patients have for contacting a specialist nurse – an empirical study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(21-22), pages 3160-3166, November.
    3. Chia‐Hui Yu & Tsae‐Jyy Wang & Chih‐Long Chang & Shu‐Yuan Liang & Shu‐Fang Wu & Chieh‐Yu Liu & Yu Ying Lu, 2020. "Healthy life styles, sleep and fatigue in endometrial cancer survivors: A cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(7-8), pages 1372-1380, April.
    4. Natalie Williams & Georgia Griffin & Victoria Farrell & Yvonne L. Hauck, 2020. "Gaining insight into the supportive care needs of women experiencing gynaecological cancer: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(9-10), pages 1684-1694, May.
    5. Karianne Oldertrøen Solli & Marjolein de Boer & Kari Nyheim Solbrække & Lisbeth Thoresen, 2019. "Male partners’ experiences of caregiving for women with cervical cancer—a qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5-6), pages 987-996, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:4890-4898. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.