IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i17-18p2414-2423.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The transition of a large‐scale quality improvement initiative: a bibliometric analysis of the Productive Ward: Releasing Time to Care Programme

Author

Listed:
  • Mark White
  • John SG Wells
  • Tony Butterworth

Abstract

Aims and objectives To examine the literature related to a large‐scale quality improvement initiative, the ‘Productive Ward: Releasing Time to Care’, providing a bibliometric profile that tracks the level of interest and scale of roll‐out and adoption, discussing the implications for sustainability. Background Productive Ward: Releasing Time to Care (aka Productive Ward) is probably one of the most ambitious quality improvement efforts engaged by the UK‐NHS. Politically and financially supported, its main driver was the NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement. The NHS institute closed in early 2013 leaving a void of resources, knowledge and expertise. UK roll‐out of the initiative is well established and has arguably peaked. International interest in the initiative however continues to develop. Methods A comprehensive literature review was undertaken to identify the literature related to the Productive Ward and its implementation (January 2006–June 2013). A bibliometric analysis examined/reviewed the trends and identified/measured interest, spread and uptake. Results Overall distribution patterns identify a declining trend of interest, with reduced numbers of grey literature and evaluation publications. However, detailed examination of the data shows no reduction in peer‐reviewed outputs. There is some evidence that international uptake of the initiative continues to generate publications and create interest. Conclusions Sustaining this initiative in the UK will require re‐energising, a new focus and financing. The transition period created by the closure of its creator may well contribute to further reduced levels of interest and publication outputs in the UK. However, international implementation, evaluation and associated publications could serve to attract professional/academic interest in this well‐established, positively reported, quality improvement initiative. Relevance to clinical practice This paper provides nurses and ward teams involved in quality improvement programmes with a detailed, current‐state, examination and analysis of the Productive Ward literature, highlighting the bibliometric patterns of this large‐scale, international, quality improvement programme. It serves to disseminate updated publication information to those in clinical practice who are involved in Productive Ward or a similar quality improvement initiative.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark White & John SG Wells & Tony Butterworth, 2014. "The transition of a large‐scale quality improvement initiative: a bibliometric analysis of the Productive Ward: Releasing Time to Care Programme," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(17-18), pages 2414-2423, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:17-18:p:2414-2423
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12585
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12585
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12585?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Radnor, Zoe J. & Holweg, Matthias & Waring, Justin, 2012. "Lean in healthcare: The unfilled promise?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(3), pages 364-371.
    2. Zoe Radnor & Paul Walley, 2008. "Learning to Walk Before We Try to Run: Adapting Lean for the Public Sector," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 13-20, February.
    3. Stella Wright & Wilfred McSherry, 2013. "A systematic literature review of Releasing Time to Care: The Productive Ward," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(9-10), pages 1361-1371, May.
    4. Glenn Robert & Elizabeth Morrow & Jill Maben & Peter Griffiths & Lynn Callard, 2011. "The adoption, local implementation and assimilation into routine nursing practice of a national quality improvement programme: the Productive Ward in England," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(7‐8), pages 1196-1207, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stella Wright & Wilfred McSherry, 2014. "Evaluating the Productive Ward at an acute NHS trust: experiences and implications of releasing time to care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(13-14), pages 1866-1876, July.
    2. Federica Centauri & Marta Marsilio & Stefano Villa & Francesco Nicosia, 2016. "Implementare il modello Lean nelle organizzazioni sanitarie: il caso dell?Ospedale Galliera," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(100), pages 27-55.
    3. Prattana Punnakitikashem & Philip Hallinger, 2019. "Bibliometric Review of the Knowledge Base on Healthcare Management for Sustainability, 1994–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    4. D’Andreamatteo, Antonio & Ianni, Luca & Lega, Federico & Sargiacomo, Massimo, 2015. "Lean in healthcare: A comprehensive review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(9), pages 1197-1209.
    5. Federica Centauri & Jacopo Guercini & Caterina Bianciardi & Vincenzo Mezzatesta, 2017. "Strutturare il cambiamento organizzativo negli ospedali: l?esperienza dell?Ufficio Lean dell?AOU Senese," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(104), pages 51-67.
    6. Elizabeth Quinlan & Susan Robertson & Ann-Marie Urban & Isobel M Findlay & Beth Bilson, 2020. "Ameliorating Workplace Harassment among Direct Caregivers in Canada’s Healthcare System: A Theatre-Based Intervention," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(4), pages 626-643, August.
    7. Karl-Arne Johannessen & Hans Comtet & Erik Fosse, 2021. "A Drone Logistic Model for Transporting the Complete Analytic Volume of a Large-Scale University Laboratory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-19, April.
    8. Steve New & Mohammed Hadi & Sharon Pickering & Eleanor Robertson & Lauren Morgan & Damian Griffin & Gary Collins & Oliver Rivero-Arias & Ken Catchpole & Peter McCulloch, 2016. "Lean Participative Process Improvement: Outcomes and Obstacles in Trauma Orthopaedics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-13, April.
    9. Pearce A. D. & Pons D. J., 2017. "Defining Lean Change—Framing Lean Implementation in Organizational Development," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(4), pages 1-10, March.
    10. Fournier, Pierre-Luc & Chênevert, Denis & Jobin, Marie-Hélène, 2021. "The antecedents of physicians’ behavioral support for lean in healthcare: The mediating role of commitment to organizational change," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    11. Luana Bonome Message Costa & Moacir Godinho Filho & Antonio Freitas Rentes & Thiago Moreno Bertani & Ronaldo Mardegan, 2017. "Lean healthcare in developing countries: evidence from Brazilian hospitals," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 99-120, January.
    12. Sharon J. Williams & Zoe Radnor, 2018. "Using bandwidths to visualize and improve patient pathways," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 21-28, January.
    13. Dag Øivind Madsen & Stig Risvik & Tonny Stenheim, 2017. "The diffusion of Lean in the Norwegian municipality sector: An exploratory survey," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1411067-141, January.
    14. Tuuli Luoma & Seppo Junnila & Lasse Forsman, 2011. "Illustration of value creation in real estate business," ERES eres2011_250, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    15. Agnetis, Alessandro & Bianciardi, Caterina & Iasparra, Nicola, 2019. "Integrating lean thinking and mathematical optimization: A case study in appointment scheduling of hematological treatments," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    16. Pearce, Antony & Pons, Dirk, 2019. "Advancing lean management: The missing quantitative approach," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    17. Jacob DAMMAND & Mads HORLYCK & Thomas Lyngholm JACOBSEN & Rainer LUEG & Rasmus Laygardt RÖCK, 2014. "Lean management in hospitals: Evidence from Denmark," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2014(23), pages 19-35, December.
    18. Krachler, Nick & Greer, Ian, 2015. "When does marketisation lead to privatisation? Profit-making in English health services after the 2012 Health and Social Care Act," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 215-223.
    19. Matt Andrews & Lant Pritchett & Michael Woolcock, 2016. "Doing Iterative and Adaptive Work," CID Working Papers 313, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    20. Akmal, Adeel & Podgorodnichenko, Nataliya & Foote, Jeff & Greatbanks, Richard & Stokes, Tim & Gauld, Robin, 2021. "Why is Quality Improvement so Challenging? A Viable Systems Model Perspective to Understand the Frustrations of Healthcare Quality Improvement Managers," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(5), pages 658-664.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:17-18:p:2414-2423. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.