IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i9-10p1361-1371.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A systematic literature review of Releasing Time to Care: The Productive Ward

Author

Listed:
  • Stella Wright
  • Wilfred McSherry

Abstract

Aims and objectives This systematic review provides an overview of the literature published on Releasing Time to Care: The Productive Ward between 2005 and June 2011. Background Releasing Time to Care: The Productive Ward programme was developed by the NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement and launched in England in 2007. The programme comprises thirteen modules that aim to increase time for direct patient care, improve the patient and staff experience and make changes to the ward environment to improve efficiency. Design A systematic literature review. Methods The terms ‘Releasing Time to Care’ and ‘Productive Ward’ were applied to key healthcare databases; CINAHL, Medline, Science Direct, ProQuest, Health Business Elite, British Nursing Index, Embase, Health Management Information Consortium and PsychInfo. All papers were read and subject to a quality assessment. Results The literature search identified 95 unique sources. A lack of research on The Productive Ward programme meant it was necessary to include non‐empirical literature. In total, 18 articles met the inclusion criteria. Seven key themes were identified: the patient and staff experience, direct care time, patient safety, financial impact, embedding and sustainability, executive support and leadership, and common barriers and determinants of success. It also highlighted areas that require further exploration such as long‐term sustainability of the programme and consistent data measurement between organisations. Conclusion The review tentatively reports how The Productive Ward programme has been used to transform nursing practice for the benefit of patients and frontline staff, and how it resulted in cost savings. The literature review identified a potential positive results bias in the current literature whereby favourable outcomes were reported. Relevance to clinical practice This paper summarises the types of evidence and current literature on The Productive Ward providing a reference for frontline staff implementing the programme.

Suggested Citation

  • Stella Wright & Wilfred McSherry, 2013. "A systematic literature review of Releasing Time to Care: The Productive Ward," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(9-10), pages 1361-1371, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:9-10:p:1361-1371
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12074
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12074
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12074?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stella Wright & Wilfred McSherry, 2014. "Evaluating the Productive Ward at an acute NHS trust: experiences and implications of releasing time to care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(13-14), pages 1866-1876, July.
    2. Mark White & John SG Wells & Tony Butterworth, 2014. "The transition of a large‐scale quality improvement initiative: a bibliometric analysis of the Productive Ward: Releasing Time to Care Programme," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(17-18), pages 2414-2423, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:9-10:p:1361-1371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.