IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/isacfm/v12y2004i3p187-213.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A model for valuation of the branch offices of a savings bank based on rough sets

Author

Listed:
  • C. Pérez‐Llera
  • C. Fernández‐Baizán
  • J. L. Fanjul
  • J. Feito

Abstract

This work proposes a model for the valuation of branch offices of banks based on the rough set theory, which could be used as the basis for a decision‐making system for dimensioning strategies of a financial entity. It compares the rough set approach with the competitive discriminant analysis methodology using a common set of data from 421 branches. We pay special attention to data reduction and the creation of decision rules that will allow future branches to be classified. These rules could constitute the basis for the evaluation of the viability of dimensioning strategies for a financial entity. In order to evaluate the predictive capabilities of the decision rules, we present the results of cross‐validation tests to evaluate the ability of the model to classify new branches. It appears that the rough sets approach provides a favourable tool for the valuation of branch offices. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • C. Pérez‐Llera & C. Fernández‐Baizán & J. L. Fanjul & J. Feito, 2004. "A model for valuation of the branch offices of a savings bank based on rough sets," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(3), pages 187-213, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:isacfm:v:12:y:2004:i:3:p:187-213
    DOI: 10.1002/isaf.242
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/isaf.242
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/isaf.242?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Constantin Zopounidis & Michael Doumpos, 1999. "Business failure prediction using the UTADIS multicriteria analysis method," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 50(11), pages 1138-1148, November.
    2. Dimitras, A. I. & Slowinski, R. & Susmaga, R. & Zopounidis, C., 1999. "Business failure prediction using rough sets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 263-280, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shrutika Mishra & A. R. Tripathi, 2021. "AI business model: an integrative business approach," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Angeliki Papana & Anastasia Spyridou, 2020. "Bankruptcy Prediction: The Case of the Greek Market," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Apostolos G. Christopoulos & Ioannis G. Dokas & Iraklis Kollias & John Leventides, 2019. "An implementation of Soft Set Theory in the Variables Selection Process for Corporate Failure Prediction Models. Evidence from NASDAQ Listed Firms," Bulletin of Applied Economics, Risk Market Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 1-20.
    4. Thomas E. Mckee, 2000. "Developing a bankruptcy prediction model via rough sets theory," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(3), pages 159-173, September.
    5. Jie Sun, 2012. "Integration Of Random Sample Selection, Support Vector Machines And Ensembles For Financial Risk Forecasting With An Empirical Analysis On The Necessity Of Feature Selection," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(4), pages 229-246, October.
    6. Li, Hui & Sun, Jie, 2012. "Forecasting business failure: The use of nearest-neighbour support vectors and correcting imbalanced samples – Evidence from the Chinese hotel industry," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 622-634.
    7. I Y-F Huang & W-W Wu & Y-T Lee, 2008. "Simplifying essential competencies for Taiwan civil servants using the rough set approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(2), pages 259-265, February.
    8. Şaban Çelik, 2013. "Micro Credit Risk Metrics: A Comprehensive Review," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(4), pages 233-272, October.
    9. Ioannis Tsolas, 2015. "Firm credit risk evaluation: a series two-stage DEA modeling framework," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 233(1), pages 483-500, October.
    10. Xie, Feng & Lin, Yi & Ren, Wenwei, 2011. "Optimizing model for land use/land cover retrieval from remote sensing imagery based on variable precision rough sets," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(2), pages 232-240.
    11. Ana Paula Matias Gama & Helena Susana Amaral Geraldes, 2012. "Credit risk assessment and the impact of the New Basel Capital Accord on small and medium‐sized enterprises," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(8), pages 727-749, July.
    12. Zhou, Fanyin & Fu, Lijun & Li, Zhiyong & Xu, Jiawei, 2022. "The recurrence of financial distress: A survival analysis," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 1100-1115.
    13. Haoming Wang & Xiangdong Liu, 2021. "Undersampling bankruptcy prediction: Taiwan bankruptcy data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-17, July.
    14. Salwa Kessioui & Michalis Doumpos & Constantin Zopounidis, 2023. "A Bibliometric Overview of the State-of-the-Art in Bankruptcy Prediction Methods and Applications," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Emilios Galariotis & Alexandros Garefalakis & Christos Lemonakis & Marios Menexiadis & Constantin Zo (ed.), Governance and Financial Performance Current Trends and Perspectives, chapter 6, pages 123-153, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    15. Chung-Ho Su, 2017. "A Novel Hybrid Learning Achievement Prediction Model: A Case Study in Gamification Education Applications (APPs)," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(02), pages 515-543, March.
    16. Sheikh Rabiul Islam & William Eberle & Sheikh K. Ghafoor & Sid C. Bundy & Douglas A. Talbert & Ambareen Siraj, 2019. "Investigating bankruptcy prediction models in the presence of extreme class imbalance and multiple stages of economy," Papers 1911.09858, arXiv.org.
    17. Fernando Zambrano Farias & María del Carmen Valls Martínez & Pedro Antonio Martín-Cervantes, 2021. "Explanatory Factors of Business Failure: Literature Review and Global Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-26, September.
    18. Nikolaos Daskalakis & Nikolaos Aggelakis & John Filos, 2022. "Applying, Updating and Comparing Bankruptcy Forecasting Models. The Case of Greece," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 21(3), pages 335-354, September.
    19. Hussein Slim & Sylvie Nadeau, 2020. "A Mixed Rough Sets/Fuzzy Logic Approach for Modelling Systemic Performance Variability with FRAM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, March.
    20. Michael Doumpos & Constantin Zopounidis, 1999. "A Multicriteria Discrimination Method for the Prediction of Financial Distress: The Case of Greece," Multinational Finance Journal, Multinational Finance Journal, vol. 3(2), pages 71-101, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:isacfm:v:12:y:2004:i:3:p:187-213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1099-1174/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.