IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jacrfn/v10y1997i2p90-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eva, Accounting Profits, And Ceo Turnover: An Empirical Examination, 1985–1994

Author

Listed:
  • Kenneth Lehn
  • Anil K. Makhija

Abstract

A growing number of companies use EVA or related measures of economic profits as metrics for corporate planning and executive compensation. Unlike traditional accounting measures of performance, EVA attempts to measure the value that firms create or destroy by subtracting a capital charge from the cash returns they generate on invested capital. For this reason, EVA is seen by its proponents as providing the most reliable year‐to‐year indicator of a market based performance measure known as market value added, or MVA. Although EVA and MVA have received considerable attention in recent years, there has been little empirical study of these performance measures—and what studies have been produced have provided mixed results. This study joins the debate over EVA vs. conventional accounting measures by asking a different question: Which performance measures do the best job of explaining not only stock returns, but the probability that a CEO will be dismissed for poor performance? Using a sample of 452 firms during the period 1985–1994, the authors report that EVA has a somewhat stronger correlation with stock price performance than conventional accounting measures such as ROE and ROA. But, of greater import, EVA appears to be a considerably more reliable indicator of CEO turnover than conventional accounting measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenneth Lehn & Anil K. Makhija, 1997. "Eva, Accounting Profits, And Ceo Turnover: An Empirical Examination, 1985–1994," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 10(2), pages 90-97, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jacrfn:v:10:y:1997:i:2:p:90-97
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6622.1997.tb00139.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.1997.tb00139.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1745-6622.1997.tb00139.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ashita Agrawal & Pitabas Mohanty & Navindra Kumar Totala, 2019. "Does EVA Beat ROA and ROE in Explaining the Stock Returns in Indian Scenario? An Evidence Using Mixed Effects Panel Data Regression Model," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 44(2), pages 103-134, May.
    2. Taufik Taufik & Tertiarto Wahyudi & Agung Putra Raneo & Mu'izzuddin Mu'izzuddin & Mohamad Adam, 2018. "Do Traditional Accounting and Economic Value Added Mediate The Relationship Between Corporate Governance and Firm Value of Indonesian State-Owned Enterprises ?," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 8(3), pages 118-126.
    3. Zbysław Dobrowolski & Grzegorz Drozdowski & Mirela Panait & Arkadiusz Babczuk, 2022. "Can the Economic Value Added Be Used as the Universal Financial Metric?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, March.
    4. Sujata Behera, 2020. "Does the EVA valuation model explain the market value of equity better under changing required return than constant required return?," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-23, December.
    5. Ittner, Christopher D. & Larcker, David F., 2001. "Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting: a value-based management perspective," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1-3), pages 349-410, December.
    6. Tracey West & Andrew Worthington, 1999. "The information content of economic value-added: A comparative analysis with earnings, cash flow and residual income," School of Economics and Finance Discussion Papers and Working Papers Series 066, School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology.
    7. Bushman, Robert M. & Smith, Abbie J., 2001. "Financial accounting information and corporate governance," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1-3), pages 237-333, December.
    8. Elena Shakina & Maria Molodchik, 2013. "Intangible-driven value creation: supporting and obstructing factors," HSE Working papers WP BRP 24/FE/2013, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    9. Peter Kien Pham & Jo-Ann Suchard & Jason Zein, 2011. "Corporate governance and alternative performance measures: evidence from Australian firms," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 36(3), pages 371-386, December.
    10. Adel Elgharbawy & Magdy Abdel-Kader, 2013. "Enterprise governance and value-based management: a theoretical contingency framework," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 17(1), pages 99-129, February.
    11. Andrew C. Worthington & Tracey West, 2004. "Australian Evidence Concerning the Information Content of Economic Value-Added," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 29(2), pages 201-223, December.
    12. Sujata Behera, 2021. "Does EVA valuation model outperform earnings valuation model in explaining market value of equity?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(4), pages 6312-6337, October.
    13. Sunitha Kumaran, 2017. "Shareholder Value Index for Saudi Banks," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 8(4), pages 196-212, October.
    14. Celik, Saban & Aslanertik, Banu Esra, 2011. "Linkages Between Value Based Performance Measurements and Risk Return Trade Off: Theory and Evidence," Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, Universidad ESAN, vol. 16(31), pages 63-83.
    15. Kowalski Michał J. & Kazak Jan K., 2020. "Value-Based Management for Real Estate Developers’ Activities," Real Estate Management and Valuation, Sciendo, vol. 28(4), pages 48-62, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jacrfn:v:10:y:1997:i:2:p:90-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1078-1196 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.