IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/iaf/journl/y2019i3p95-99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial Innovation for Assessing the Enterprise Capitalization

Author

Listed:
  • Oksana Melnyk

    (Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Kyiv, Ukraine)

Abstract

Capitalization is one of the most popular criteria for assessing the success of the functioning and development of a business, because it widely characterizes the existing potential of an enterprise, the possibilities and prospects of its use. The article is devoted to determining the features of capitalization valuation based on the concept of the enterprise fundamental value. The research is based on the expanded content of the enterprise capitalization, which make it possible to argue the expediency of shifting the analytical focus from the processes of capital formation to its ability to provide the creation and growth of value flows. Traditional financial issues of enterprise capital appreciation are considered in the aspect of market value, which characterizes the enterprise mainly as an object of investment interest of subjects of financial and economic relations. Taking into account the dual value nature of the enterprise, the focus of the study has shifted to an organizational capacity to provide value formation and value, which is measured from a financial point of view on the basis of modified models of economic profit. The results of generalizing the practical experience of using such models testify to their high level of informativeness and adequacy, and high level of factor interpretation provides the possibility of continuous monitoring of critical points informing the dynamics of formation / destruction of value. Restrictions on the use of modified models of economic profit in the processes of capitalization based on fundamental value are not critical from the point of view of capital formation analysis. So, modified models of economic profit can be recommended for appropriate practical use. It was determined that capitalization based on fundamental rather than market value fundamentally changes the focus of management business analytics. In particular emphasis is placed on evaluating organizational capacity to deliver financial and economic results. Modified models of economic profit have been identified as effective analytical tools for such assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Oksana Melnyk, 2019. "Financial Innovation for Assessing the Enterprise Capitalization," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 3, pages 95-99, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2019:i:3:p:95-99
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.afj.org.ua/pdf/683-finansovi-novacii-v-ocinyuvanni-kapitalizacii-pidpriemstva.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.afj.org.ua/en/article/683/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fernández, Pablo, 2002. "EVA, Economic profit and cash value added do NOT measure shareholder value creation," IESE Research Papers D/453, IESE Business School.
    2. Glenn D. Feltham & Grant E. Issac & Chima Mbagwu & Ganesh Vaidyanathan, 2004. "Perhaps Eva Does Beat Earnings—Revisiting Previous Evidence," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 16(1), pages 83-88, January.
    3. Calum G. Turvey & Linda Lake & Erna van Duren & David Sparling, 2000. "The relationship between economic value added and the stock market performance of agribusiness firms," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(4), pages 399-416.
    4. Andrew C. Worthington & Tracey West, 2004. "Australian Evidence Concerning the Information Content of Economic Value-Added," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 29(2), pages 201-223, December.
    5. Biddle, Gary C. & Bowen, Robert M. & Wallace, James S., 1997. "Does EVA(R) beat earnings? Evidence on associations with stock returns and firm values," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 301-336, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gabriela Chmelíková, 2011. "Framework of performance measurement system for Czech small breweries," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 59(7), pages 167-176.
    2. Gabriela Chmelíková, 2013. "Performance factors of Czech brewing industry companies," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 61(2), pages 353-365.
    3. Sweety Narang & Mandeep Kaur, 2014. "Impact of Firm-specific Attributes on Shareholder Value Creation of Indian Companies: An Empirical Analysis," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 15(4), pages 847-866, December.
    4. Sujata Behera, 2021. "Does EVA valuation model outperform earnings valuation model in explaining market value of equity?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(4), pages 6312-6337, October.
    5. Zbysław Dobrowolski & Grzegorz Drozdowski & Mirela Panait & Arkadiusz Babczuk, 2022. "Can the Economic Value Added Be Used as the Universal Financial Metric?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, March.
    6. Ashita Agrawal & Pitabas Mohanty & Navindra Kumar Totala, 2019. "Does EVA Beat ROA and ROE in Explaining the Stock Returns in Indian Scenario? An Evidence Using Mixed Effects Panel Data Regression Model," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 44(2), pages 103-134, May.
    7. Kowalski Michał J. & Kazak Jan K., 2020. "Value-Based Management for Real Estate Developers’ Activities," Real Estate Management and Valuation, Sciendo, vol. 28(4), pages 48-62, December.
    8. David Sparling & Calum G. Turvey, 2003. "Further thoughts on the relationship between economic value added and stock market performance," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(2), pages 255-267.
    9. Sujata Behera, 2020. "Does the EVA valuation model explain the market value of equity better under changing required return than constant required return?," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-23, December.
    10. Yuanzhan Chen & Zhuo Jin & Bo Qin, 2023. "Economic Value Added in performance measurement: A simulation approach and empirical evidence," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(1), pages 109-140, March.
    11. Namik Erdogan & Serpil Altinirmak & Caglar Karamasa, 2016. "Performance Assessment of Real Estate Investment Trusts (REIT) Listed in BIST Via Different Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(7), pages 304-304, July.
    12. Amarda Kadia, 2021. "Corruption and Economic Growth in the Balkan Countries," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 6, September.
    13. Menkhoff, Lukas & Rungruxsirivorn, Ornsiri, 2009. "Village Funds in the Rural Credit Market of Thailand," Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, Frankfurt a.M. 2009 45, Verein für Socialpolitik, Research Committee Development Economics.
    14. Leo Vashkor Dewri, 2022. "A Critical Assessment of Interrelationship Among Corporate Governance, Financial Performance, Refined Economic Value Added to Measure Firm Value and Return on Stock," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(4), pages 2718-2759, December.
    15. Sunil Dutta & Stefan Reichelstein, 2000. "Controlling Investment Decisions: Hurdle Rates and Intertemporal Cost Allocation," CESifo Working Paper Series 354, CESifo.
    16. Saadet Kasman & Adnan Kasman, 2011. "Efficiency, Productivity and Stock Performance: Evidence from the Turkish Banking Sector," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 58(3), pages 355-372, September.
    17. Alexandre, Herve & Charreaux, Gerard, 2004. "Efficiency of French privatizations: a dynamic vision," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 467-494, June.
    18. Khaled Aljifri & Hafiz Imtiaz Ahmad, 2019. "Preferred Valuation Techniques in the UAE: A Comparative Study of Financial and Nonfinancial Sectors," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 9(1), pages 51-59.
    19. Tracey West & Andrew Worthington, 1999. "The information content of economic value-added: A comparative analysis with earnings, cash flow and residual income," School of Economics and Finance Discussion Papers and Working Papers Series 066, School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology.
    20. Stefan Hirsch, 2018. "Successful In The Long Run: A Meta†Regression Analysis Of Persistent Firm Profits," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 23-49, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    capitalization; fundamental value; economic profit; value added; cash flows;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2019:i:3:p:95-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serhiy Ostapchuk (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iafkvua.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.