IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v6y2016i5p682-694.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacts of stratum dip angle on CO 2 geological storage amount and security

Author

Listed:
  • Fugang Wang
  • Jing Jing
  • Tianfu Xu
  • Yanlin Yang
  • Guangrong Jin

Abstract

Storage strata are usually generalized as horizontal when using numerical simulation methods to analyze CO 2 geological storage in saline aquifers. However, horizontal strata are not common in nature. Most strata have gradients, because of the effects of geological structure and diagenesis. Based on the actual strata dip angle variation range of two CO 2 injection demonstration projects in China, five modeling schemes were designed to investigate the impact of formation dip on CO 2 storage amount and space migration of gas‐phase CO 2 in reservoir formation. The results show that the total CO 2 storage amount is inversely proportional to formation dip, and after injection is halted, storage amounts of upper and lower parts of the same stratum reservoir have a reverse trend. Formation dip has a significant impact on the migration of CO 2 . The greater the formation dip, the more significant the effect on CO 2 migration distance. Given the low porosity and permeability of the Shiqianfeng formation reservoir in the case study, when the stratum dip angle is 16°, at centennial time scale, CO 2 migration distance is 47.06% greater than that in the horizontal reservoir. We expect that for storage reservoirs with high porosity and permeability, the influence of formation dip on CO 2 migration will be more significant. Because non‐horizontal strata are predominant in deep saline aquifers in nature, regardless of the influence of formation dip, CO 2 leakage risks in geological storage will be greatly underestimated. Therefore, in research related to CO 2 geological storage, the stratum dip angle must be considered. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Suggested Citation

  • Fugang Wang & Jing Jing & Tianfu Xu & Yanlin Yang & Guangrong Jin, 2016. "Impacts of stratum dip angle on CO 2 geological storage amount and security," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 6(5), pages 682-694, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:6:y:2016:i:5:p:682-694
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/ghg.1594
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pruess, Karsten & García, Julio & Kovscek, Tony & Oldenburg, Curt & Rutqvist, Jonny & Steefel, Carl & Xu, Tianfu, 2004. "Code intercomparison builds confidence in numerical simulation models for geologic disposal of CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(9), pages 1431-1444.
    2. Qi Li & Wenbin Fei & Xuehao Liu & Xiaochen Wei & Miao Jing & Xiaochun Li, 2014. "Challenging combination of CO 2 geological storage and coal mining in the Ordos basin, China," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 4(4), pages 452-467, August.
    3. Radoslav S. Dimitrov, 2010. "Inside Copenhagen: The State of Climate Governance," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 10(2), pages 18-24, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kim, Min & Kwon, Seoyoon & Ji, Minsoo & Shin, Hyundon & Min, Baehyun, 2023. "Multi-lateral horizontal well with dual-tubing system to improve CO2 storage security and reduce CCS cost," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 330(PB).
    2. Jing, Jing & Yang, Yanlin & Cheng, Jianmei & Ding, Zhaojing & Wang, Dandan & Jing, Xianwen, 2023. "Analysis of the effect of formation dip angle and injection pressure on the injectivity and migration of CO2 during storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    3. Emad A. Al†Khdheeawi & Stephanie Vialle & Ahmed Barifcani & Mohammad Sarmadivaleh & Yihuai Zhang & Stefan Iglauer, 2018. "Impact of salinity on CO2 containment security in highly heterogeneous reservoirs," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 8(1), pages 93-105, February.
    4. Jing, Jing & Yang, Yanlin & Tang, Zhonghua, 2021. "Assessing the influence of injection temperature on CO2 storage efficiency and capacity in the sloping formation with fault," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PA).
    5. Masoud Ahmadinia & Seyed M. Shariatipour, 2020. "Analysing the role of caprock morphology on history matching of Sleipner CO2 plume using an optimisation method," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 10(5), pages 1077-1097, October.
    6. Masoud Ahmadinia & Seyed M. Shariatipour, 2021. "A study on the impact of storage boundary and caprock morphology on carbon sequestration in saline aquifers," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(1), pages 183-205, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Ruirui & Wang, Guiling & Shen, Xiaoxu & Wang, Jinfeng & Tan, Xianfeng & Feng, Shoutao & Hong, Jinglan, 2020. "Is geothermal heating environmentally superior than coal fired heating in China?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    2. Liu, Junrong & Deng, Guoying & Yan, Jingzhou & Ma, Shibo, 2023. "Unraveling the impact of climate policy uncertainty on corporate default risk: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PB).
    3. Detlef F. Sprinz & Bruce Bueno de Mesquita & Steffen Kallbekken & Frans Stokman & Håkon Sælen & Robert Thomson, 2016. "Predicting Paris: Multi-Method Approaches to Forecast the Outcomes of Global Climate Negotiations," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 172-187.
    4. Elvis Parraguez-Vergara & Jonathan R. Barton & Gabriela Raposo-Quintana, 2016. "Impacts of Climate Change in the Andean Foothills of Chile: Economic and Cultural Vulnerability of Indigenous Mapuche Livelihoods," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 32(4), pages 454-483, December.
    5. Eren Cifci & Matthew E. Oliver, 2018. "Reassessing the Links between GHG Emissions, Economic Growth, and the UNFCCC: A Difference-in-Differences Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-22, January.
    6. Anna Wachowicz-Pyzik & Anna Sowiżdżał & Leszek Pająk & Paweł Ziółkowski & Janusz Badur, 2020. "Assessment of the Effective Variants Leading to Higher Efficiency for the Geothermal Doublet, Using Numerical Analysis‒Case Study from Poland (Szczecin Trough)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, May.
    7. Atle Midttun & Paddy Coulter & Audrey Gadzekpo & Jin Wang, 2015. "Comparing Media Framings of Climate Change in Developed, Rapid Growth and Developing Countries: Findings from Norway, China and Ghana," Energy & Environment, , vol. 26(8), pages 1271-1292, December.
    8. Philipp Pattberg & Cille Kaiser & Oscar Widerberg & Johannes Stripple, 2022. "20 Years of global climate change governance research: taking stock and moving forward," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 295-315, June.
    9. Margherita Brondino & Fulvio Signore & Agnese Zambelli & Emanuela Ingusci & Silvia Pignata & Amelia Manuti & Maria Luisa Giancaspro & Alessandra Falco & Damiano Girardi & Dina Guglielmi & Marco Depolo, 2022. "A New Academic Quality at Work Tool (AQ@workT) to Assess the Quality of Life at Work in the Italian Academic Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-22, March.
    10. Ismail Ismail & Vassilis Gaganis, 2023. "Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage in Saline Aquifers: Subsurface Policies, Development Plans, Well Control Strategies and Optimization Approaches—A Review," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-29, May.
    11. William R. Moomaw & Rishikesh Ram Bhandary & Laura Kuhl & Patrick Verkooijen, 2017. "Sustainable Development Diplomacy: Diagnostics for the Negotiation and Implementation of Sustainable Development," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(1), pages 73-81, February.
    12. Jie Bao & Zhijie Xu & Yilin Fang, 2015. "A coupled discrete element and finite element model for multiscale simulation of geological carbon sequestration," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 5(4), pages 474-486, August.
    13. Samson Mukanjari & Thomas Sterner, 2024. "Do markets Trump politics? Fossil and renewable market reactions to major political events," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 62(2), pages 805-836, April.
    14. Galaz, Victor & Crona, Beatrice & Österblom, Henrik & Olsson, Per & Folke, Carl, 2012. "Polycentric systems and interacting planetary boundaries — Emerging governance of climate change–ocean acidification–marine biodiversity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 21-32.
    15. Benjamin Court & Thomas Elliot & Joseph Dammel & Thomas Buscheck & Jeremy Rohmer & Michael Celia, 2012. "Promising synergies to address water, sequestration, legal, and public acceptance issues associated with large-scale implementation of CO 2 sequestration," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 569-599, August.
    16. Radoslav S. Dimitrov, 2010. "Inside UN Climate Change Negotiations: The Copenhagen Conference," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 27(6), pages 795-821, November.
    17. Charles F. Parker & Christer Karlsson, 2017. "The European Union as a global climate leader: confronting aspiration with evidence," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 445-461, August.
    18. Xin, Yue & Zhang, Yindi & Xue, Peng & Wang, Ke & Adu, Emmanuel & Tontiwachwuthikul, Paitoon, 2021. "The optimization and thermodynamic and economic estimation analysis for CO2 compression-liquefaction process of CCUS system using LNG cold energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    19. Curtis M. Oldenburg & Sumit Mukhopadhyay & Abdullah Cihan, 2016. "On the use of Darcy's law and invasion‐percolation approaches for modeling large‐scale geologic carbon sequestration," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 6(1), pages 19-33, February.
    20. Siwon Park, 2016. "The power of presidency in UN climate change negotiations: comparison between Denmark and Mexico," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 16(6), pages 781-795, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:6:y:2016:i:5:p:682-694. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.