IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v29y2004i9p1431-1444.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Code intercomparison builds confidence in numerical simulation models for geologic disposal of CO2

Author

Listed:
  • Pruess, Karsten
  • García, Julio
  • Kovscek, Tony
  • Oldenburg, Curt
  • Rutqvist, Jonny
  • Steefel, Carl
  • Xu, Tianfu

Abstract

Numerical simulators were exercised on a suite of test problems for CO2 disposal in saline aquifers and depleting oil and gas reservoirs. Intercomparison of results reveals broad agreement in most areas, but also points out sensitivities to fluid properties and discretization approaches that need further study. Currently available simulation codes were shown capable of modeling the complex phenomena accompanying geologic storage of CO2 in a robust manner, and with quantitatively similar results.

Suggested Citation

  • Pruess, Karsten & García, Julio & Kovscek, Tony & Oldenburg, Curt & Rutqvist, Jonny & Steefel, Carl & Xu, Tianfu, 2004. "Code intercomparison builds confidence in numerical simulation models for geologic disposal of CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(9), pages 1431-1444.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:29:y:2004:i:9:p:1431-1444
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2004.03.077
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544204001604
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2004.03.077?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Didi & He, Yao & Zhang, Hongcheng & Xu, Wenbin & Jiang, Xi, 2017. "A numerical study of the impurity effects on CO2 geological storage in layered formation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 107-120.
    2. Lehua Pan & Nicolas Spycher & Christine Doughty & Karsten Pruess, 2017. "ECO2N V2.0: A TOUGH2 fluid property module for modeling CO 2 ‐H 2 O‐NACL systems to elevated temperatures of up to 300°C," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 7(2), pages 313-327, April.
    3. Anna Wachowicz-Pyzik & Anna Sowiżdżał & Leszek Pająk & Paweł Ziółkowski & Janusz Badur, 2020. "Assessment of the Effective Variants Leading to Higher Efficiency for the Geothermal Doublet, Using Numerical Analysis‒Case Study from Poland (Szczecin Trough)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Fugang Wang & Jing Jing & Tianfu Xu & Yanlin Yang & Guangrong Jin, 2016. "Impacts of stratum dip angle on CO 2 geological storage amount and security," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 6(5), pages 682-694, October.
    5. Zhang, Lisong & Zhang, Shiyan & Jiang, Weizhai & Wang, Zhiyuan & Li, Jing & Bian, Yinghui, 2018. "A mechanism of fluid exchange associated to CO2 leakage along activated fault during geologic storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 1178-1190.
    6. Curtis M. Oldenburg & Sumit Mukhopadhyay & Abdullah Cihan, 2016. "On the use of Darcy's law and invasion‐percolation approaches for modeling large‐scale geologic carbon sequestration," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 6(1), pages 19-33, February.
    7. Jie Bao & Zhijie Xu & Yilin Fang, 2015. "A coupled discrete element and finite element model for multiscale simulation of geological carbon sequestration," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 5(4), pages 474-486, August.
    8. Benjamin Court & Thomas Elliot & Joseph Dammel & Thomas Buscheck & Jeremy Rohmer & Michael Celia, 2012. "Promising synergies to address water, sequestration, legal, and public acceptance issues associated with large-scale implementation of CO 2 sequestration," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 569-599, August.
    9. Ismail Ismail & Vassilis Gaganis, 2023. "Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage in Saline Aquifers: Subsurface Policies, Development Plans, Well Control Strategies and Optimization Approaches—A Review," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-29, May.
    10. Li, Didi & Zhang, Hongcheng & Li, Yang & Xu, Wenbin & Jiang, Xi, 2018. "Effects of N2 and H2S binary impurities on CO2 geological storage in stratified formation – A sensitivity study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 482-492.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:29:y:2004:i:9:p:1431-1444. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.