IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v10y2020i5p1077-1097.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysing the role of caprock morphology on history matching of Sleipner CO2 plume using an optimisation method

Author

Listed:
  • Masoud Ahmadinia
  • Seyed M. Shariatipour

Abstract

Geological carbon storage is a promising solution to reduce the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere to ameliorate the effects of global warming from the greenhouse effect. Among feasible storage options, deep saline aquifers are believed to have the largest storage capacity for the gas collected from industrial processes. The first CO2 storage project at a commercial scale in a saline aquifer is in the Sleipner field of the Utsira storage formation in Norway. The long ongoing storage operation in the Sleipner field has been the subject of several past studies attempting to recreate the observed injected CO2 plume migration behaviour. History matching is a method to adjust the input parameters of the model in a way to minimise the mismatch between the simulated and the actual production data in reservoir engineering and applicable to carbon sequestration. Typical parameters adjusted in history matching are porosity, absolute and relative permeability data. In this study, we used an adjoint‐based optimisation tool and showed the importance of caprock morphology in finding an accurate plume match. Using a set of synthetic models, we initially minimised the mismatch between the observed and simulated CO2 plume outline by modifying the caprock topographical details. After testing the optimisation tool on the synthetic models, we applied the methodology to the Sleipner benchmark 2019 model and improved the plume match by locally adjusting caprock elevation within seismic detection limits. We subsequently improved the match by calibrating porosity, permeability, CO2 density and injection rate together in an experiment in which we calibrated all the parameters, including the caprock morphology, to find a better match. The results showed an improvement of around 8% (compared with the original model) in the plume match resulting from an average absolute elevation change of 3.23 m in the model while keeping the other parameters constant. Calibrating the porosity, permeability, CO2 density and injection rate resulted in a 5% improvement in the match, and once caprock morphology was included in the optimisation process, the match improvement increased by 16%. We changed the caprock elevation within a range lower than the seismic detection limit, and results showed that even a few metres variations in the elevation have significant impacts on the plume migration and trapping mechanism in the Sleipner model. The method presented in this work results in a better match than the original seismic data for the Sleipner model. © 2020 The Authors. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology published by Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Masoud Ahmadinia & Seyed M. Shariatipour, 2020. "Analysing the role of caprock morphology on history matching of Sleipner CO2 plume using an optimisation method," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 10(5), pages 1077-1097, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:10:y:2020:i:5:p:1077-1097
    DOI: 10.1002/ghg.2027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.2027
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ghg.2027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Torp, Tore A & Gale, John, 2004. "Demonstrating storage of CO2 in geological reservoirs: The Sleipner and SACS projects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(9), pages 1361-1369.
    2. Arts, R. & Eiken, O. & Chadwick, A. & Zweigel, P. & van der Meer, L. & Zinszner, B., 2004. "Monitoring of CO2 injected at Sleipner using time-lapse seismic data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(9), pages 1383-1392.
    3. Fugang Wang & Jing Jing & Tianfu Xu & Yanlin Yang & Guangrong Jin, 2016. "Impacts of stratum dip angle on CO 2 geological storage amount and security," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 6(5), pages 682-694, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Masoud Ahmadinia & Seyed M. Shariatipour, 2021. "A study on the impact of storage boundary and caprock morphology on carbon sequestration in saline aquifers," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(1), pages 183-205, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Masoud Ahmadinia & Seyed M. Shariatipour, 2021. "A study on the impact of storage boundary and caprock morphology on carbon sequestration in saline aquifers," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(1), pages 183-205, February.
    2. Aminu, Mohammed D. & Nabavi, Seyed Ali & Rochelle, Christopher A. & Manovic, Vasilije, 2017. "A review of developments in carbon dioxide storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 1389-1419.
    3. Zhong, Jinjin & Jiang, Xi, 2017. "A case study of using cosmic ray muons to monitor supercritical CO2 migration in geological formations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P2), pages 1450-1458.
    4. Ghorbani, Afshin & Rahimpour, Hamid Reza & Ghasemi, Younes & Zoughi, Somayeh & Rahimpour, Mohammad Reza, 2014. "A Review of Carbon Capture and Sequestration in Iran: Microalgal Biofixation Potential in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 73-100.
    5. Emad A. Al†Khdheeawi & Stephanie Vialle & Ahmed Barifcani & Mohammad Sarmadivaleh & Yihuai Zhang & Stefan Iglauer, 2018. "Impact of salinity on CO2 containment security in highly heterogeneous reservoirs," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 8(1), pages 93-105, February.
    6. Dimitrios Mendrinos & Spyridon Karytsas & Olympia Polyzou & Constantine Karytsas & Åsta Dyrnes Nordø & Kirsti Midttømme & Danny Otto & Matthias Gross & Marit Sprenkeling & Ruben Peuchen & Tara Geerdin, 2022. "Understanding Societal Requirements of CCS Projects: Application of the Societal Embeddedness Level Assessment Methodology in Four National Case Studies," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-15, September.
    7. Stian Rørheim & Mohammad Hossain Bhuiyan & Andreas Bauer & Pierre Rolf Cerasi, 2021. "On the Effect of CO 2 on Seismic and Ultrasonic Properties: A Novel Shale Experiment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Nguyen, Ngoc N. & La, Vinh T. & Huynh, Chinh D. & Nguyen, Anh V., 2022. "Technical and economic perspectives of hydrate-based carbon dioxide capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    9. R. Andrew Chadwick & David J. Noy, 2015. "Underground CO2 storage: demonstrating regulatory conformance by convergence of history‐matched modeled and observed CO2 plume behavior using Sleipner time‐lapse seismics," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 5(3), pages 305-322, June.
    10. Sergio E Morales & William E Holben, 2013. "Functional Response of a Near-Surface Soil Microbial Community to a Simulated Underground CO2 Storage Leak," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-1, November.
    11. Jing, Jing & Yang, Yanlin & Cheng, Jianmei & Ding, Zhaojing & Wang, Dandan & Jing, Xianwen, 2023. "Analysis of the effect of formation dip angle and injection pressure on the injectivity and migration of CO2 during storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    12. Kolditz, O. & Bauer, S. & Böttcher, N. & Elsworth, D. & Görke, U.-J. & McDermott, C.-I. & Park, C.-H. & Singh, A.K. & Taron, J. & Wang, W., 2012. "Numerical simulation of two-phase flow in deformable porous media: Application to carbon dioxide storage in the subsurface," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 82(10), pages 1919-1935.
    13. Aspelund, Audun & Gundersen, Truls, 2009. "A liquefied energy chain for transport and utilization of natural gas for power production with CO2 capture and storage - Part 1," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(6), pages 781-792, June.
    14. van Alphen, Klaas & van Ruijven, Jochem & Kasa, Sjur & Hekkert, Marko & Turkenburg, Wim, 2009. "The performance of the Norwegian carbon dioxide, capture and storage innovation system," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 43-55, January.
    15. Singh, A.K. & Goerke, U.-J. & Kolditz, O., 2011. "Numerical simulation of non-isothermal compositional gas flow: Application to carbon dioxide injection into gas reservoirs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3446-3458.
    16. Pham, V.T.H. & Riis, F. & Gjeldvik, I.T. & Halland, E.K. & Tappel, I.M. & Aagaard, P., 2013. "Assessment of CO2 injection into the south Utsira-Skade aquifer, the North Sea, Norway," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 529-540.
    17. Sikandar Khan & Yehia Abel Khulief & Abdullatif Al-Shuhail, 2019. "Mitigating climate change via CO2 sequestration into Biyadh reservoir: geomechanical modeling and caprock integrity," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 23-52, January.
    18. Lu Shi & Zhijiao Zeng & Bing Bai & Xiaochun Li, 2018. "Effect of the intermediate principal stress on the evolution of mudstone permeability under true triaxial compression," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 8(1), pages 37-50, February.
    19. Moioli, Emanuele & Schildhauer, Tilman, 2022. "Negative CO2 emissions from flexible biofuel synthesis: Concepts, potentials, technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    20. Mohammad H. Bhuiyan & Nicolaine Agofack & Kamila M. Gawel & Pierre R. Cerasi, 2020. "Micro- and Macroscale Consequences of Interactions between CO 2 and Shale Rocks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-30, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:10:y:2020:i:5:p:1077-1097. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.