IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v5y2015i5p603-621.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of management and co‐digestion on life cycle emissions and energy from anaerobic digestion

Author

Listed:
  • Horacio A. Aguirre‐Villegas
  • Rebecca Larson
  • Douglas J. Reinemann

Abstract

This study applies life cycle assessment (LCA) techniques to evaluate the processes controling the environmental impacts of anaerobic digestion (AD) pathways on a modeled dairy farm setting representative of Wisconsin. Seven electricity‐producing AD pathways are compared against a base‐case (BC) pathway to understand the effect of management practices, co‐digestion strategies, and energy conversion processes on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, ammonia (NH 3 ) emissions, depletion of fossil fuels (DFF), and nutrient balances. The pathway selected has a substantial influence on the estimates of environmental impacts. GHG emissions range from 178 to 267 kg CO 2 ‐eq GJ-super-−1, NH 3 emissions range from 11 to 18 kg GJ-super-−1, DFF range from 176 to 327 MJ GJ-super-−1, and N availability ranges from 7 to 15 kg GJ-super-−1 of produced energy. The results of this paper show that the environmental benefits and concerns of anaerobic digestion systems can be further improved with the adoption of management practices on‐farm. Injection of digestate during land application is an effective management practice to reduce NH 3 emissions, which at the same time increases N availability and reduces GHG emissions and DFF given that the manufacturing of purchased fertilizers is fossil energy intensive. Co‐digesting manure with corn stover and switchgrass increases energy production. Recovering heat has proven to be an easy to adopt strategy that improves all sustainability indicators without implementing major operational changes. Finally, 100 kg CO 2 ‐eq GJ-super-−1, 4.2 kg NH 3 GJ-super-−1 and 566 MJ GJ-super-−1 are determined for GHG emissions, NH 3 emissions and DFF respectively for a compressed biogas pathway. © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Suggested Citation

  • Horacio A. Aguirre‐Villegas & Rebecca Larson & Douglas J. Reinemann, 2015. "Effects of management and co‐digestion on life cycle emissions and energy from anaerobic digestion," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 5(5), pages 603-621, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:5:y:2015:i:5:p:603-621
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/ghg.1506
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chandra, R. & Takeuchi, H. & Hasegawa, T., 2012. "Methane production from lignocellulosic agricultural crop wastes: A review in context to second generation of biofuel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 1462-1476.
    2. Appels, Lise & Lauwers, Joost & Degrève, Jan & Helsen, Lieve & Lievens, Bart & Willems, Kris & Van Impe, Jan & Dewil, Raf, 2011. "Anaerobic digestion in global bio-energy production: Potential and research challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(9), pages 4295-4301.
    3. Cherubini, Francesco, 2010. "GHG balances of bioenergy systems – Overview of key steps in the production chain and methodological concerns," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 1565-1573.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Usack, J.G. & Gerber Van Doren, L. & Posmanik, R. & Labatut, R.A. & Tester, J.W. & Angenent, L.T., 2018. "An evaluation of anaerobic co-digestion implementation on New York State dairy farms using an environmental and economic life-cycle framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 28-40.
    2. Sahoo, Kamalakanta & Mani, Sudhagar, 2019. "Economic and environmental impacts of an integrated-state anaerobic digestion system to produce compressed natural gas from organic wastes and energy crops," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hagos, Kiros & Zong, Jianpeng & Li, Dongxue & Liu, Chang & Lu, Xiaohua, 2017. "Anaerobic co-digestion process for biogas production: Progress, challenges and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1485-1496.
    2. Kumar, Subodh & Gandhi, Paras & Yadav, Monika & Paritosh, Kunwar & Pareek, Nidhi & Vivekanand, Vivekanand, 2019. "Weak alkaline treatment of wheat and pearl millet straw for enhanced biogas production and its economic analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 753-764.
    3. Tiwary, A. & Williams, I.D. & Pant, D.C. & Kishore, V.V.N., 2015. "Emerging perspectives on environmental burden minimisation initiatives from anaerobic digestion technologies for community scale biomass valorisation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 883-901.
    4. Nissilä, Marika E. & Li, Ya-Chieh & Wu, Shu-Yii & Lin, Chiu-Yue & Puhakka, Jaakko A., 2012. "Hydrogenic and methanogenic fermentation of birch and conifer pulps," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 58-65.
    5. Ezeilo, Uchenna R. & Wahab, Roswanira Abdul & Mahat, Naji Arafat, 2020. "Optimization studies on cellulase and xylanase production by Rhizopus oryzae UC2 using raw oil palm frond leaves as substrate under solid state fermentation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 1301-1312.
    6. Senghor, A. & Dioh, R.M.N. & Müller, C. & Youm, I., 2017. "Cereal crops for biogas production: A review of possible impact of elevated CO2," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 548-554.
    7. Edwards, Joel & Othman, Maazuza & Burn, Stewart, 2015. "A review of policy drivers and barriers for the use of anaerobic digestion in Europe, the United States and Australia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 815-828.
    8. Du, Jing & Qian, Yuting & Xi, Yonglan & Lü, Xiwu, 2019. "Hydrothermal and alkaline thermal pretreatment at mild temperature in solid state for physicochemical properties and biogas production from anaerobic digestion of rice straw," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 261-267.
    9. Kimming, M. & Sundberg, C. & Nordberg, Å. & Hansson, P.-A., 2015. "Vertical integration of local fuel producers into rural district heating systems – Climate impact and production costs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 51-61.
    10. Monia El Akkari & Nosra Ben Fradj & Benoit Gabrielle & Sylvestre Njakou Djomo, 2023. "Spatially-explicit environmental assessment of bioethanol from miscanthus and switchgrass in France [Évaluation environnementale spatialement explicite du bioéthanol produit à partir de miscanthus ," Post-Print hal-04369771, HAL.
    11. Suopajärvi, Hannu & Pongrácz, Eva & Fabritius, Timo, 2013. "The potential of using biomass-based reducing agents in the blast furnace: A review of thermochemical conversion technologies and assessments related to sustainability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 511-528.
    12. Gahyun Baek & Jaai Kim & Jinsu Kim & Changsoo Lee, 2018. "Role and Potential of Direct Interspecies Electron Transfer in Anaerobic Digestion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, January.
    13. Safieddin Ardebili, Seyed Mohammad, 2020. "Green electricity generation potential from biogas produced by anaerobic digestion of farm animal waste and agriculture residues in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 29-37.
    14. Chadwick, Dara T. & McDonnell, Kevin P. & Brennan, Liam P. & Fagan, Colette C. & Everard, Colm D., 2014. "Evaluation of infrared techniques for the assessment of biomass and biofuel quality parameters and conversion technology processes: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 672-681.
    15. Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar & Ferreira, Jorge A. & Sirohi, Ranjna & Sarsaiya, Surendra & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Baladi, Samin & Sindhu, Raveendran & Binod, Parameswaran & Pandey, Ashok & Juneja, Ankita & , 2021. "A critical review on the development stage of biorefinery systems towards the management of apple processing-derived waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    16. da Silva, Francinaldo Leite & de Oliveira Campos, Alan & dos Santos, Davi Alves & Batista Magalhães, Emilianny Rafaely & de Macedo, Gorete Ribeiro & dos Santos, Everaldo Silvino, 2018. "Valorization of an agroextractive residue—Carnauba straw—for the production of bioethanol by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 661-669.
    17. Cleary, Julian & Caspersen, John P., 2015. "Comparing the life cycle impacts of using harvest residue as feedstock for small- and large-scale bioenergy systems (part I)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 917-926.
    18. Weronika Kruszelnicka, 2020. "A New Model for Environmental Assessment of the Comminution Process in the Chain of Biomass Energy Processing †," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
    19. Grau, Baquero & Bernat, Esteban & Rita, Puig & Jordi-Roger, Riba & Antoni, Rius, 2013. "Environmental life cycle assessment of rapeseed straight vegetable oil as self-supply agricultural biofuel," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 142-149.
    20. Kumari, Dolly & Singh, Radhika, 2018. "Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes for biofuel production: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 877-891.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:5:y:2015:i:5:p:603-621. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.