IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/masfgc/v24y2019i1d10.1007_s11027-018-9792-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mitigating climate change via CO2 sequestration into Biyadh reservoir: geomechanical modeling and caprock integrity

Author

Listed:
  • Sikandar Khan

    (King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals)

  • Yehia Abel Khulief

    (King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals)

  • Abdullatif Al-Shuhail

    (King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals)

Abstract

Excessive emissions of greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, can cause severe global climatic changes, which may include an increase in the global temperature, rise of the sea level, increase in wildfire, floods, and storms, in addition to changes in the amount of rain and snow. The global mitigation strategies that can be envisioned to reduce the release of greenhouse gas emissions to the atmosphere include retrofitting buildings with more energy-efficient systems, increasing the dependency on renewable energy sources in lieu of fossil fuels, increasing the use of sustainable transportation systems that rely on electricity and biofuels, and adopting globally more sustainable uses of land and forests. To reduce global climatic changes, the excess amount of carbon dioxide in the environment needs to be captured and stored in deep underground sedimentary reservoirs. The sedimentary reservoirs that contain water in the rock matrix provide a more secure CO2 sequestration medium. The injection of carbon dioxide causes a huge increase in the reservoir pore pressure and provokes the subsequent ground uplift. The excessive increase in pore pressure may also cause leakage of carbon dioxide into the potable water layers and to the atmosphere, thus leading to severe global climatic changes. In order to maintain the integrity of the sequestration process, it is crucial to inject a safe quantity of carbon dioxide into the sequestration site. Accordingly, the injection period and the safe values of injection parameters, like flow rate and injection pressure, need to be calculated a priori to ensure that the stored carbon dioxide will not leak into the atmosphere and jeopardize the climate mitigation strategy. To model carbon dioxide injection in reservoirs having a base fluid, such as water, one has to perform a two-phase flow modeling for both the injected and base fluids. In the present investigation, carbon dioxide is injected into Biyadh reservoir, wherein the two-phase flow through the reservoir structure is taken into account. This investigation aims to estimate the safe parameter values for carbon dioxide injection into the Biyadh reservoir, in order to avoid leakage of carbon dioxide through the caprock. In this context, the two cases of a fractured and non-fractured caprock are considered. To ensure a safe sequestration mechanism, the coupled reservoir stability analysis is performed to estimate the safe values of the injection parameters, thus furnishing data for a reliable global climate change mitigation strategy. The obtained results demonstrated that the injection of carbon dioxide has caused a maximum pore pressure increase of 25 MPa and a ground uplift of 35 mm.

Suggested Citation

  • Sikandar Khan & Yehia Abel Khulief & Abdullatif Al-Shuhail, 2019. "Mitigating climate change via CO2 sequestration into Biyadh reservoir: geomechanical modeling and caprock integrity," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 23-52, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:24:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s11027-018-9792-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s11027-018-9792-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11027-018-9792-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11027-018-9792-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Damen, Kay & Faaij, André & van Bergen, Frank & Gale, John & Lysen, Erik, 2005. "Identification of early opportunities for CO2 sequestration—worldwide screening for CO2-EOR and CO2-ECBM projects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(10), pages 1931-1952.
    2. Gibbins, Jon & Chalmers, Hannah, 2008. "Carbon capture and storage," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 4317-4322, December.
    3. Torp, Tore A & Gale, John, 2004. "Demonstrating storage of CO2 in geological reservoirs: The Sleipner and SACS projects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(9), pages 1361-1369.
    4. Streit, Jürgen E & Hillis, Richard R, 2004. "Estimating fault stability and sustainable fluid pressures for underground storage of CO2 in porous rock," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(9), pages 1445-1456.
    5. Asbjørn Torvanger & Kristin Rypdal & Steffen Kallbekken, 2005. "Geological CO 2 Storage as a Climate Change Mitigation Option," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 693-715, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rashid Mohamed Mkemai & Gong Bin, 0. "A modeling and numerical simulation study of enhanced CO2 sequestration into deep saline formation: a strategy towards climate change mitigation," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 901-927.
    2. Kamal Jawher Khudaida & Diganta Bhusan Das, 2020. "A Numerical Analysis of the Effects of Supercritical CO 2 Injection on CO 2 Storage Capacities of Geological Formations," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-32, September.
    3. Rashid Mohamed Mkemai & Gong Bin, 2020. "A modeling and numerical simulation study of enhanced CO2 sequestration into deep saline formation: a strategy towards climate change mitigation," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 901-927, May.
    4. Ye, Xiaoqi & Yu, Ziwang & Xu, Tianfu & Zhang, Yanjun & Guo, Liangliang, 2024. "Numerical study on the geomechanical responses in the Jilin Oilfield CO2-EOR and CGS projects in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    5. Sikandar Khan, 2023. "A Modeling Study Focused on Improving the Aerodynamic Performance of a Small Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, March.
    6. Lei Zhu & Xing Yao & Xian Zhang, 2020. "Evaluation of cooperative mitigation: captured carbon dioxide for enhanced oil recovery," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 1261-1285, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alirza Orujov & Kipp Coddington & Saman A. Aryana, 2023. "A Review of CCUS in the Context of Foams, Regulatory Frameworks and Monitoring," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-41, April.
    2. Dimitrios Mendrinos & Spyridon Karytsas & Olympia Polyzou & Constantine Karytsas & Åsta Dyrnes Nordø & Kirsti Midttømme & Danny Otto & Matthias Gross & Marit Sprenkeling & Ruben Peuchen & Tara Geerdin, 2022. "Understanding Societal Requirements of CCS Projects: Application of the Societal Embeddedness Level Assessment Methodology in Four National Case Studies," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-15, September.
    3. Setiawan, Andri D. & Cuppen, Eefje, 2013. "Stakeholder perspectives on carbon capture and storage in Indonesia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 1188-1199.
    4. Barelli, L. & Ottaviano, A., 2014. "Solid oxide fuel cell technology coupled with methane dry reforming: A viable option for high efficiency plant with reduced CO2 emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 118-129.
    5. Shanling Zhang & Sheng Jiang & Hongda Li & Peiran Li & Xiuping Zhong & Chen Chen & Guigang Tu & Xiang Liu & Zhenhua Xu, 2025. "Current Status and Reflections on Ocean CO 2 Sequestration: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-28, February.
    6. Torben Treffeisen & Andreas Henk, 2020. "Faults as Volumetric Weak Zones in Reservoir-Scale Hydro-Mechanical Finite Element Models—A Comparison Based on Grid Geometry, Mesh Resolution and Fault Dip," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-27, May.
    7. Christian Leßmann & Arne Steinkraus, 2016. "Kurz zum Klima: »Carbon Capture and Storage« – was kostet die Emissionsvermeidung?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 69(05), pages 51-54, March.
    8. Nasvi, M.C.M. & Ranjith, P.G. & Sanjayan, J. & Haque, A., 2013. "Sub- and super-critical carbon dioxide permeability of wellbore materials under geological sequestration conditions: An experimental study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 231-239.
    9. Aydin, Gokhan & Karakurt, Izzet & Aydiner, Kerim, 2010. "Evaluation of geologic storage options of CO2: Applicability, cost, storage capacity and safety," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(9), pages 5072-5080, September.
    10. Hu, Haixiang & Li, Xiaochun & Fang, Zhiming & Wei, Ning & Li, Qianshu, 2010. "Small-molecule gas sorption and diffusion in coal: Molecular simulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 2939-2944.
    11. Stewart Russell & Nils Markusson & Vivian Scott, 2012. "What will CCS demonstrations demonstrate?," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 651-668, August.
    12. Sean P. Rigby & Ali Alsayah & Richard Seely, 2022. "Impact of Exposure to Supercritical Carbon Dioxide on Reservoir Caprocks and Inter-Layers during Sequestration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-34, October.
    13. Chang, Yuan & Gao, Siqi & Ma, Qian & Wei, Ying & Li, Guoping, 2024. "Techno-economic analysis of carbon capture and utilization technologies and implications for China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    14. Lin, Chih-Wei & Nazeri, Mahmoud & Bhattacharji, Ayan & Spicer, George & Maroto-Valer, M. Mercedes, 2016. "Apparatus and method for calibrating a Coriolis mass flow meter for carbon dioxide at pressure and temperature conditions represented to CCS pipeline operations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 759-764.
    15. Cavalcanti, Eduardo J.C. & Lima, Matheus S.R. & de Souza, Gabriel F., 2020. "Comparison of carbon capture system and concentrated solar power in natural gas combined cycle: Exergetic and exergoenvironmental analyses," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 1336-1347.
    16. Kemp, Alexander G. & Sola Kasim, A., 2010. "A futuristic least-cost optimisation model of CO2 transportation and storage in the UK/UK Continental Shelf," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 3652-3667, July.
    17. Maitri Verma & Alok Kumar Verma & A. K. Misra, 2021. "Mathematical modeling and optimal control of carbon dioxide emissions from energy sector," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(9), pages 13919-13944, September.
    18. Perera, M.S.A. & Ranjith, P.G. & Choi, S.K. & Airey, D., 2011. "The effects of sub-critical and super-critical carbon dioxide adsorption-induced coal matrix swelling on the permeability of naturally fractured black coal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6442-6450.
    19. Aspelund, Audun & Gundersen, Truls, 2009. "A liquefied energy chain for transport and utilization of natural gas for power production with CO2 capture and storage - Part 1," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(6), pages 781-792, June.
    20. Buttinelli, M. & Procesi, M. & Cantucci, B. & Quattrocchi, F. & Boschi, E., 2011. "The geo-database of caprock quality and deep saline aquifers distribution for geological storage of CO2 in Italy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 2968-2983.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:24:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s11027-018-9792-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.