IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v31y2024i5p4265-4279.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multi‐level model integrating corporate social responsibility and political activity in the European Union: What are the institutional implications for foreign companies?

Author

Listed:
  • Andreia Borges
  • Nelson Ramalho

Abstract

Many multinational corporations develop business operations in Europe. The current research attempts to fill the gap on how corporations can increase their political influence in this geography by exploring the joint effect of corporate political activity (CPA) and social responsibility (CSR) on political embeddedness and financial performance. Based on institutional theory and on a sample of autochthonous (European Union [EU]) and allochthonous (non‐EU) firms with declared EU lobbying (from 2008 to 2019) we conducted two studies. Based on a multi‐level model, Study 1 finds strong and robust evidence that boardroom gender diversity and EU lobbyists interactively increase EU political embeddedness. Complementarily, Study 2, which relies on general linear Modeling, suggests that allochthonous corporations are more profitable when they display high‐level political embeddedness and lobbying expenditures, combined with adoption of United Nations (UN) guidelines. Overall, findings show that lobbying in Europe pays off, especially when corporations strive to be aligned with EU ethical values and aspirations. Hiring lobbyists to be based in Brussels and promoting gender equality help establish EU political connections. Subsequently, findings highlight the role that EU political embeddedness, lobbying expenditures, and UN guidelines play in leveraging financial performance, especially across non‐EU corporations. Regarding EU corporations, results show that a firm‐level investment on CPA‐CSR is particularly important. Overall, findings from this research support corporations that are growing businesses in Europe.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreia Borges & Nelson Ramalho, 2024. "A multi‐level model integrating corporate social responsibility and political activity in the European Union: What are the institutional implications for foreign companies?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4265-4279, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:31:y:2024:i:5:p:4265-4279
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.2795
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2795
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.2795?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kevin Campbell & Antonio Mínguez-Vera, 2008. "Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Financial Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 83(3), pages 435-451, December.
    2. Jonathan P. Doh & Thomas Lawton & Tazeeb Rajwani, 2012. "Advancing Nonmarket Strategy Research : Institutional Perspectives in a Changing World," Post-Print hal-02312974, HAL.
    3. Taïeb Hafsi & Gokhan Turgut, 2013. "Boardroom Diversity and its Effect on Social Performance: Conceptualization and Empirical Evidence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 112(3), pages 463-479, February.
    4. Antonio Argandoña & Heidi Hoivik, 2009. "Corporate Social Responsibility: One Size Does Not Fit All. Collecting Evidence from Europe," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 89(3), pages 221-234, November.
    5. Peter Rodriguez & Donald S Siegel & Amy Hillman & Lorraine Eden, 2006. "Three lenses on the multinational enterprise: politics, corruption, and corporate social responsibility," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 37(6), pages 733-746, November.
    6. Orhun Guldiken & Mark R. Mallon & Stav Fainshmidt & William Q. Judge & Cynthia E. Clark, 2019. "Beyond tokenism: How strategic leaders influence more meaningful gender diversity on boards of directors," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(12), pages 2024-2046, December.
    7. Douglas A. Schuler & Wei Shi & Robert E. Hoskisson & Tao Chen, 2017. "Windfalls of emperors' sojourns: Stock market reactions to Chinese firms hosting high-ranking government officials," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(8), pages 1668-1687, August.
    8. René P. Orij & Saif Rehman & Hashim Khan & Faisal Khan, 2021. "Is CSR the new competitive environment for CEOs? The association between CEO turnover, corporate social responsibility and board gender diversity: Asian evidence," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 731-747, March.
    9. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:48:y:2010:i::p:1329-1349 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Adams, Renée B. & Ferreira, Daniel, 2009. "Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 291-309, November.
    11. Kenneth Roeck & Nathalie Delobbe, 2012. "Do Environmental CSR Initiatives Serve Organizations’ Legitimacy in the Oil Industry? Exploring Employees’ Reactions Through Organizational Identification Theory," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 110(4), pages 397-412, November.
    12. Oxelheim, Lars & Randoy, Trond, 2003. "The impact of foreign board membership on firm value," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(12), pages 2369-2392, December.
    13. Steven M. Mcguire & Johan P. Lindeque, 2010. "The Diminishing Returns to Trade Policy in the European Union," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(5), pages 1329-1349, November.
    14. Benjamin Barber & Luis Diestre, 2019. "Pushing for speed or scope? Pharmaceutical lobbying and Food and Drug Administration drug review," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(8), pages 1194-1218, August.
    15. Thomas Lawton & Steven Mcguire & Tazeeb Rajwani, 2013. "Corporate Political Activity : A Literature Review and Research Agenda," Post-Print hal-02312913, HAL.
    16. Borghesi, Richard & Houston, Joel F. & Naranjo, Andy, 2014. "Corporate socially responsible investments: CEO altruism, reputation, and shareholder interests," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 164-181.
    17. Du, Jialin & Bai, Tao & Chen, Stephen, 2019. "Integrating corporate social and corporate political strategies: Performance implications and institutional contingencies in China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 299-316.
    18. Duygu Turker, 2009. "Measuring Corporate Social Responsibility: A Scale Development Study," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 85(4), pages 411-427, April.
    19. Frank Hond & Kathleen A. Rehbein & Frank G. A. Bakker & Hilde Kooijmans-van Lankveld, 2014. "Playing on Two Chessboards: Reputation Effects between Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Corporate Political Activity (CPA)," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(5), pages 790-813, July.
    20. Pushpika Vishwanathan & Hans (J.) van Oosterhout & Pursey P. M. A. R. Heugens & Patricio Duran & Marc van Essen, 2020. "Strategic CSR: A Concept Building Meta‐Analysis," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(2), pages 314-350, March.
    21. Jonathan P. Doh & Thomas Lawton & Tazeeb Rajwani, 2012. "Advancing Nonmarket Strategy Research : Institutional Perspectives in a Changing World," Post-Print hal-02276718, HAL.
    22. Ruchunyi Fu & Yi Tang & Guoli Chen, 2020. "Chief sustainability officers and corporate social (Ir)responsibility," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(4), pages 656-680, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shirodkar, Vikrant & Liedong, Tahiru Azaaviele & Rajwani, Tazeeb & Lawton, Thomas C., 2024. "MNE nonmarket strategy in a changing world: Complexities, varieties, and a values-based approach," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(2).
    2. Shantanu Banerjee & Sunil Venaik, 2018. "The Effect of Corporate Political Activity on MNC Subsidiary Legitimacy: An Institutional Perspective," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 58(5), pages 813-844, October.
    3. Pei Sun & Jonathan Doh & Tazeeb Rajwani & Timothy Werner & Xiaowei Rose Luo, 2024. "The Management of Socio‐Political Issues and Environments: Toward a Research Agenda for Corporate Socio‐Political Engagement," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 277-306, March.
    4. Ko, Guihan & Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph & Appiah, Gloria & Larimo, Jorma, 2022. "Non-market strategies and building digital trust in sharing economy platforms," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(1).
    5. Donbesuur, Francis & Zahoor, Nadia & Al-Tabbaa, Omar & Adomako, Samuel & Tarba, Shlomo Y., 2023. "On the performance of platform-based international new ventures: The roles of non-market strategies and managerial competencies," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(2).
    6. Thomas M Maak & Nicola M Pless & Christian Voegtlin, 2016. "Business Statesman or Shareholder Advocate? CEO Responsible Leadership Styles and the Micro-Foundations of Political CSR," Post-Print hal-01480535, HAL.
    7. Liedong, Tahiru Azaaviele & Rajwani, Tazeeb & Lawton, Thomas C., 2020. "Information and nonmarket strategy: Conceptualizing the interrelationship between big data and corporate political activity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    8. Anna-Lena Maier, 2021. "Political corporate social responsibility in authoritarian contexts," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(4), pages 476-495, December.
    9. Gregor Dorfleitner & Christian Kreuzer, 2024. "Board Responsibility for Irresponsibility: The Link Between Board Structure and Corporate Scandals," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 76(3), pages 433-461, September.
    10. Paul B. McGuinness & João Paulo Vieito & Mingzhu Wang, 2020. "Proactive government intervention, board gender balance, and stakeholder engagement in China and Europe," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 719-762, September.
    11. Banerjee, Shantanu & Venaik, Sunil & Brewer, Paul, 2019. "Analysing corporate political activity in MNC subsidiaries through the integration-responsiveness framework," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 1-1.
    12. Atif, Muhammad & Hossain, Mohammed & Alam, Md Samsul & Goergen, Marc, 2021. "Does board gender diversity affect renewable energy consumption?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    13. José Carlos Marques, 2017. "Industry Business Associations: Self-Interested or Socially Conscious?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(4), pages 733-751, July.
    14. Hernández-Atienza, Fernando & Rodríguez-Sanz, Juan Antonio & Tejerina-Gaite, Fernando, 2024. "The pathways of board diversity in European contexts: Exploring the influence of director types on firm performance," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(PA).
    15. Gammeltoft, Peter & Panibratov, Andrei, 2024. "Emerging market multinationals and the politics of internationalization," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(3).
    16. Jonas Puck & Thomas Lawton & Alexander Mohr, 2018. "The Corporate Political Activity of MNCs: Taking Stock and Moving Forward," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 58(5), pages 663-673, October.
    17. Bimbo Onaolapo Adejare & Ekpenyong Ekpenyong Udofia & Gbemi Oladipo Olaore, 2023. "Strategy integration, sustainable drivers of firm internationalization performance—Moderated by environmental uncertainty and firm capabilities," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 301-328, September.
    18. Klopf, Patricia & Nell, Phillip C., 2018. "How “space” and “place” influence subsidiary host country political embeddedness," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 186-197.
    19. Cosmina Lelia Voinea & Hans Kranenburg, 2018. "Feeling the Squeeze: Nonmarket Institutional Pressures and Firm Nonmarket Strategies," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 58(5), pages 705-741, October.
    20. Rizwan Ali & Muhammad Safdar Sial & Talles Vianna Brugni & Jinsoo Hwang & Nguyen Vinh Khuong & Thai Hong Thuy Khanh, 2019. "Does CSR Moderate the Relationship between Corporate Governance and Chinese Firm’s Financial Performance? Evidence from the Shanghai Stock Exchange (SSE) Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:31:y:2024:i:5:p:4265-4279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.