IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v15y2008i2p76-88.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Situations of opportunity – Hammarby Sjöstad and Stockholm City's process of environmental management

Author

Listed:
  • Örjan Svane

Abstract

Hammarby Sjöstad is a large brownfield development in Stockholm guided by extensive environmental objectives. This case study focuses on the environmental management of the city's project team. A main aim was methodology development related to the concept of situations of opportunity – how to study those periods when the team had great influence over the process. Goal conflicts on for example energy use and the lake view were identified. The team used policy instruments such as development contracts and design competitions. Some of the situations identified contributed little to the environmental management, for example the detailed planning. Others were more successful, for example the integration of infrastructural systems. Success situations were unique or created by the team, and had less formal power. Other situations had more power, but were burdened with a prehistory of routines and agreements. The methodology should also be applicable to other processes of environmental management. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Örjan Svane, 2008. "Situations of opportunity – Hammarby Sjöstad and Stockholm City's process of environmental management," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(2), pages 76-88, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:15:y:2008:i:2:p:76-88
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.138
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.138?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ans Kolk & Anniek Mauser, 2002. "The evolution of environmental management: from stage models to performance evaluation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(1), pages 14-31, January.
    2. Örjan Svane & Carina Weingaertner, 2006. "MAMMUT - managing the metabolism of urbanization: testing theory through a pilot study of the Stockholm Underground," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(5), pages 312-326.
    3. Peter Dobers, 1999. "Organizing environmental control in temporary local organizations," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(3), pages 163-176, May.
    4. Packendorff, Johann, 1995. "Inquiring into the temporary organization: New directions for project management research," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 319-333, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suzanne Benn & Damien Giurco & Paul James Brown & Renu Agarwal, 2014. "Towards Responsible Steel: Preliminary Insights," Resources, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Ping Yung, 2015. "A new institutional economic theory of project management," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 228-243, February.
    3. Suchandra Paul, 2018. "Crisis in Boeing 787 Dreamliner: An Investigation from Project Management Control Perspective," International Journal of Human Resource Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 8(4), pages 242251-2422, December.
    4. Weyer, Birgit, 2011. "Perspectives on optimism within the context of project management: A call for multilevel research," Working Papers 59, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute of Management Berlin (IMB).
    5. Julien Gosse & Chris CM Forman & Nicolas van Zeebroeck, 2023. "Adoption of ICT and Environmental Management Practices: Empirical Evidence from European Firms," Working Papers TIMES² 2023-070, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    6. Abbas Mardani & Dalia Streimikiene & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Mehrbakhsh Nilashi & Ahmad Jusoh & Habib Zare, 2017. "Application of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to Solve Environmental Sustainability Problems: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-65, October.
    7. Pekka Tervonen & Harri Haapasalo & Sari Juntunen, 2010. "Development of environmental management: a case study of steel production," International Journal of Sustainable Economy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(2), pages 144-163.
    8. Eeva-Sofia Säynäjoki & Jukka Heinonen & Seppo Junnila, 2014. "The Power of Urban Planning on Environmental Sustainability: A Focus Group Study in Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-22, September.
    9. Ivo Hristov & Andrea Appolloni, 2022. "Stakeholders' engagement in the business strategy as a key driver to increase companies' performance: Evidence from managerial and stakeholders' practices," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1488-1503, May.
    10. Rüdiger Hahn, 2013. "ISO 26000 and the Standardization of Strategic Management Processes for Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(7), pages 442-455, November.
    11. Erik G. Hansen & Stefan Schaltegger, 2016. "The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard: A Systematic Review of Architectures," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(2), pages 193-221, January.
    12. Nicoleta Cristache & Marian Nãstase & Radu Petrariu & Margareta Florescu, 2019. "Analysis of Congruency Effects of Corporate Responsibility Code Implementation on Corporate Sustainability in Bio-Economy," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(52), pages 536-536, August.
    13. René Lindner & Carmen Jaca & Josune Hernantes, 2021. "A Good Practice for Integrating Stakeholders through Standardization—The Case of the Smart Mature Resilience Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    14. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:2:p:915-947 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Birgit Brunklaus & Tove Malmqvist & Henrikke Baumann, 2009. "Managing stakeholders or the environment? The challenge of relating indicators in practice," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), pages 27-37, January.
    16. Vincent Salaun, 2014. "Organisation virtuelle éphémère, quelle place pour le management logistique ? Le cas des festivals musicaux," Post-Print hal-01309975, HAL.
    17. María del Carmen Galera-Quiles & Laura Piedra-Muñoz & Emilio Galdeano-Gómez & Angel Carreño-Ortega, 2021. "A Review of Eco-Innovations and Exports Interrelationship, with Special Reference to International Agrifood Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, January.
    18. Ilaria Tutore, 2021. "Exploring the Effect of National Culture on Corporate Environmental Proactivity," International Journal of Operations Management, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 2(1), pages 17-22, October.
    19. Harish Kumar Jeswani & Walter Wehrmeyer & Yacob Mulugetta, 2008. "How warm is the corporate response to climate change? Evidence from Pakistan and the UK," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(1), pages 46-60, January.
    20. Daniel Arenas & Pablo Sanchez & Matthew Murphy, 2013. "Different Paths to Collaboration Between Businesses and Civil Society and the Role of Third Parties," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 115(4), pages 723-739, July.
    21. Henrik Herlau & HeLge Tetzschner, 2001. "Securing Knowledge Assets in the Early Phase of Innovation," Working Papers 28/01, University of Southern Denmark, Department of Sociology, Environmental and Business Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:15:y:2008:i:2:p:76-88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.