IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/camsys/v19y2023i4ne1360.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

School‐based law enforcement strategies to reduce crime, increase perceptions of safety, and improve learning outcomes in primary and secondary schools: A systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin W. Fisher
  • Anthony Petrosino
  • Hannah Sutherland
  • Sarah Guckenburg
  • Trevor Fronius
  • Ivan Benitez
  • Kevin Earl

Abstract

Background School‐based law enforcement (SBLE) has become a common intervention. Although SBLE is meant to make schools safer, critics suggest it may not accomplish this purpose, and may have unintended negative consequences such as increasing students’ exclusionary discipline or contact with the criminal justice system. There may also be secondary effects related to perceptions of the school or student learning. Objectives The purpose of this review is to synthesize the literature evaluating the use of SBLE, including outcomes related to (a) crime and behavior problems; (b) perceptions of safety; and (c) learning. Methods We conducted a systematic literature search to identify studies that examined outcomes associated with SBLE use. Eligible studies used experimental or quasi‐experimental designs; included samples of students, teachers/staff, schools, or school districts; reported on a policing strategy focused on crime prevention or school safety that did not involve officers teaching a curriculum; included a measure that reflects crime and behavior problems, perceptions of safety, or learning; and were in a primary or secondary school. Following a multi‐stage screening process to identify studies eligible for inclusion, we estimated a series of meta‐analytic models with robust variance estimation to calculate weighted mean effect sizes for each of three main categories of outcomes and commonly occurring subsets of these categories. We examined heterogeneity in these estimates across features of the primary studies’ design. Results The search and screening process yielded 1002 effect sizes from 32 reports. There were no true experiments, and the quasi‐experiments ranged from strictly correlational to permitting stronger causal inferences. SBLE use was associated with greater crime and behavior problems in studies that used schools as the unit of analysis. Within this category, SBLE use was associated with increased exclusionary discipline among studies that used both schools (g = 0.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.02, 0.27]) and students (g = 0.003, 95% CI [0.002, 0.003]) as the unit of analysis. SBLE use was not associated with any measures of crime or violence in schools. SBLE use was associated with greater feelings of safety among studies that used schools as the unit of analysis (g = 0.18, 95% CI [0.13, 0.24]), although this estimate was based on only seven effect sizes from two correlational studies. All the other models, including those examining learning outcomes, yielded null results. None of the moderators tested showed meaningful relationships, indicating the findings were consistent across a variety of study design features. Authors’ Conclusions This study's findings provide no evidence that there is a safety‐promoting component of SBLE, and support the criticism that SBLE criminalizes students and schools. Although we found no evidence of differences across methodological features, risk of bias in the primary studies limits our confidence in making causal inferences. To the extent that the findings are causal, schools that invest in strategies to improve safety will likely benefit from divesting from SBLE and instead investing in evidence‐based strategies for enhancing school safety. Schools that continue to use SBLE should ensure that their model has no harmful effects and is providing safety benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin W. Fisher & Anthony Petrosino & Hannah Sutherland & Sarah Guckenburg & Trevor Fronius & Ivan Benitez & Kevin Earl, 2023. "School‐based law enforcement strategies to reduce crime, increase perceptions of safety, and improve learning outcomes in primary and secondary schools: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:19:y:2023:i:4:n:e1360
    DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1360
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1360
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/cl2.1360?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emily G. Owens, 2017. "Testing the School‐to‐Prison Pipeline," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(1), pages 11-37, January.
    2. Ruddell, Rick & Thomas, Matthew O. & Way, Lori Beth, 2005. "Breaking the chain: Confronting issueless college town disturbances and riots," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 549-560.
    3. Theriot, Matthew T., 2009. "School resource officers and the criminalization of student behavior," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 280-287, May.
    4. Ennett, S.T. & Tobler, N.S. & Ringwalt, C.L. & Flewelling, R.L., 1994. "How effective is drug abuse resistance education? A meta-analysis of project DARE outcome evaluations," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 84(9), pages 1394-1401.
    5. Crank, John & Crank, Joe & Christensen, Wendy, 2003. "The Ada Sheriffs Youth Foundation: The development of a decentralized youth program," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 341-350.
    6. Emily K. Weisburst, 2019. "Patrolling Public Schools: The Impact of Funding for School Police on Student Discipline and Long‐term Education Outcomes," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(2), pages 338-365, March.
    7. Ethan M Higgins & Brandon S Coffey & Benjamin W Fisher & Ivan Benitez & Kristin Swartz, 2022. "School Safety or School Criminalization? The Typical day of A School Resource Officer in the United States," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 62(3), pages 568-584.
    8. Currey, George H. & Carr, Adam F. & Schnelle, John F. & Risley, Todd R., 1983. "Police research technology: Functional relations between juvenile citations and criminal offenses," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 15-26.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lucy C. Sorensen & Montserrat Avila‐Acosta & John B. Engberg & Shawn D. Bushway, 2023. "The thin blue line in schools: New evidence on school‐based policing across the U.S," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(4), pages 941-970, September.
    2. Robynn Cox & Jamein P. Cunningham, 2021. "Financing The War On Drugs: The Impact Of Law Enforcement Grants On Racial Disparities In Drug Arrests," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(1), pages 191-224, January.
    3. Fisher, Benjamin W. & Fisher, Amy E., 2023. "Criminal justice system contact of students with disabilities by race and ethnicity: Examining the role of school police," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    4. Richard L. Dukes & Judith A. Stein & Jodie B. Ullman, 1997. "Long-Term Impact of Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E," Evaluation Review, , vol. 21(4), pages 483-500, August.
    5. Kevin N. Griffith & Lawrence M. Scheier, 2013. "Did We Get Our Money’s Worth? Bridging Economic and Behavioral Measures of Program Success in Adolescent Drug Prevention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-28, November.
    6. Anderson, D. Mark, 2010. "Does information matter? The effect of the Meth Project on meth use among youths," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 732-742, September.
    7. Chad Nye & Jamie Schwartz & Herb Turner, 2005. "PROTOCOL: The Effectiveness of Parental Involvement for Improving the Academic Performance of Elementary School Children," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(1), pages 1-19.
    8. Anderson, D. Mark & Rees, Daniel I., 2015. "Per se drugged driving laws and traffic fatalities," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 122-134.
    9. Gottlieb, Aaron & Wilson, Robert, 2019. "The effect of direct and vicarious police contact on the educational achievement of urban teens," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 190-199.
    10. Richard F. Catalano & M. Lisa Berglund & Jean A. M. Ryan & Heather S. Lonczak & J. David Hawkins, 2004. "Positive Youth Development in the United States: Research Findings on Evaluations of Positive Youth Development Programs," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 591(1), pages 98-124, January.
    11. Joel H. Brown & Marianne D'Emidio Caston, 1995. "On Becoming "At Risk" Through Drug Education," Evaluation Review, , vol. 19(4), pages 451-491, August.
    12. Andrés Raineri Bernain, 2001. "Desarrollo De Habilidades Psicosociales En Ejecutivos: Una Revision De La Literatura," Abante, Escuela de Administracion. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile., vol. 4(2), pages 157-192.
    13. Andrew Bacher-Hicks & Stephen B. Billings & David J. Deming, 2019. "The School to Prison Pipeline: Long-Run Impacts of School Suspensions on Adult Crime," NBER Working Papers 26257, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Kelley, Allyson & Fatupaito, Bethany & Witzel, Morgan, 2018. "Is culturally based prevention effective? Results from a 3-year tribal substance use prevention program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 28-35.
    15. Richard L. Dukes & Jodie B . Ullman & Judith A. Stein, 1996. "Three-Year Follow-Up of Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E.)," Evaluation Review, , vol. 20(1), pages 49-66, February.
    16. Vesla M Weaver & Amanda Geller, 2019. "Transforming Police Surveillance of Kids to the Civic Incorporation of Youth," Working Papers wp19-08-ff, Princeton University, School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Research on Child Wellbeing..
    17. Shi, Ying & Zhu, Maria, 2022. "Equal time for equal crime? Racial bias in school discipline," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    18. Liu, Jing & Hayes, Michael S. & Gershenson, Seth, 2024. "JUE Insight: From referrals to suspensions: New evidence on racial disparities in exclusionary discipline," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    19. Caetano, Carolina & Caetano, Gregorio & Nielsen, Eric, 2024. "Are children spending too much time on enrichment activities?," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    20. Richard L. Dukes & Jodie B. Ullman & Judith A. Stein, 1995. "An Evaluation of D.A.R.E. (Drug Abuse Resistance Education), Using a Solomon Four-Group Design With Latent Variables," Evaluation Review, , vol. 19(4), pages 409-435, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:19:y:2023:i:4:n:e1360. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1891-1803 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.