IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/agribz/v5y1989i6p573-595.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Price spreads for California-Arizona navel oranges during and after the 1985 prorate suspension

Author

Listed:
  • Charles C. Lyon

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona)

  • Gary D. Thompson

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona)

  • Roger Fox

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona)

Abstract

In January 1985, rate-of-flow controls (“prorate”) for California-Arizona navel oranges were suspended for half the marketing season. This article compares the behavior of industry marketing margins during the deregulated period with that of regulated seasons in order to assess the impacts of the prorate suspension on the navel orange marketing system. Econometric results indicate that relative to subsequent regulated seasons, marketing margins contracted during the prorate suspension period. These results suggest that distributors did not exercise market power during the suspension period in order to maintain consumer prices at pre-suspension levels while depressing grower prices.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles C. Lyon & Gary D. Thompson & Roger Fox, 1989. "Price spreads for California-Arizona navel oranges during and after the 1985 prorate suspension," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 5(6), pages 573-595.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:5:y:1989:i:6:p:573-595
    DOI: 10.1002/1520-6297(198911)5:6<573::AID-AGR2720050604>3.0.CO;2-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gary D. Thompson & Charles C. Lyon, 1989. "Marketing Order Impacts on Farm-Retail Price Spreads: The Suspension of Prorates on California-Arizona Navel Oranges," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 71(3), pages 647-660.
    2. Powers, Nicholas J. & Zepp, Glenn A. & Hoff, Frederic L., 1986. "Assessment of a Marketing Order Prorate Suspension: A Study of California - Arizona Naval Oranges," Agricultural Economic Reports 308010, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Glenn Nelson & Tom H. Robinson, 1978. "Retail and Wholesale Demand and Marketing Order Policy for Fresh Navel Oranges," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 60(3), pages 502-509.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elizabeth Hoffman & Gary D. Libecap, 1994. "Political Bargaining and Cartelization in the New Deal: Orange Marketing Orders," NBER Chapters, in: The Regulated Economy: A Historical Approach to Political Economy, pages 189-222, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Richards, Timothy J. & Kagan, Albert & Mischen, Pamela & Adu-Asamoah, Richard, 1996. "Marketing Order Suspensions And Fresh Lemon Retail-Fob Margins," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 28(2), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Hoy F. Carman & Daniel H. Pick, 1988. "Marketing California-Arizona lemons without marketing order shipment controls," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 4(3), pages 245-259.
    4. McAleer, Michael, 1995. "The significance of testing empirical non-nested models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 149-171, May.
    5. Lyon, Charles C. & Thompson, Gary D., 1991. "Model Selection With Temporal And Spatial Aggregation: Alternative Marketing Margin Models," Staff Papers 13253, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    6. Kachel, Yael & Finkelshtain, Israel, 2010. "A Comparative Analysis of Antitrust Regulations in the Agricultural Sector in Israel, the US and the EU," Journal of Rural Cooperation, Hebrew University, Center for Agricultural Economic Research, vol. 38(1), pages 1-35.
    7. Robert Romain & Maurice Doyon & Mathieu Frigon, 2002. "Effects of state regulations on marketing margins and price transmission asymmetry: Evidence from the New York City and upstate New York fluid milk markets," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(3), pages 301-315.
    8. John M. Crespi & Adriana Chacón-Cascante, 2004. "Do U.S. marketing orders have much market power? An examination of the Almond Board of California," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(1), pages 1-15.
    9. Hansmire, Michelle R. & Willett, Lois Schertz, 1993. "Price Transmission Processes: A Study of Price Lags and Asymmetric Price Response Behavior for New York Red Delicious and McIntosh Apples," Research Bulletins 123011, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    10. Nicholas J. Powers, 1991. "Effects of marketing order prorate suspensions on California-Arizona navel oranges," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 7(3), pages 203-229.
    11. Frigon, Mathieu & Doyon, Maurice & Romain, Robert F.J., 1999. "Asymmetry in Farm-Retail Price Transmission in the Northeastern Fluid Milk Market," Research Reports 25220, University of Connecticut, Food Marketing Policy Center.
    12. Lee L. Schulz & John M. Crespi, 2012. "Presence of Check‐Off Programs and Industry Concentration in the Food Manufacturing Sector," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(2), pages 148-156, March.
    13. Sexton Richard J. & Zhang Mingxia & Chalfant James A., 2005. "Grocery Retailer Behavior in Perishable Fresh Produce Procurement," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 1-23, February.
    14. Richards, Timothy J. & Patterson, Paul M. & van Ispelen, Pieter, 1998. "Modeling Fresh Tomato Marketing Margins: Econometrics And Neural Networks," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 27(2), pages 1-14, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:5:y:1989:i:6:p:573-595. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6297 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.