IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/agribz/v12y1996i2p175-181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirical investigation of competition in Japan's raw cotton market: Implications for US cotton exports

Author

Listed:
  • Jianguo Hui

    (Dept. of Agricultural Economics, Southern University, Baton Rouge, LA 70813-2113)

  • Warren C. Couvillion

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762)

  • Patricia E. McLean-Meyinsse

    (Dept. of Agricultural Economics, Southern University, Baton Rouge, LA 70813-2113)

Abstract

Under Japan's current agricultural trade policy, the raw cotton market is efficient and competitive. With Japan's declining cotton market, the United States faces strong competition from Australia, China, and Pakistan. Empirical results reveal that: US cotton competes with cotton from Australia, China, and Pakistan but complements that from Egypt, Sudan, and the rest of the world; Japan's demand for US cotton appears to be inelastic; by lowering prices, the United States could effectively reduce Japan's imports from Australia, China, and Pakistan; and Japan would prefer to import long-staple cotton if its import expenditures increased. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianguo Hui & Warren C. Couvillion & Patricia E. McLean-Meyinsse, 1996. "Empirical investigation of competition in Japan's raw cotton market: Implications for US cotton exports," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(2), pages 175-181.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:12:y:1996:i:2:p:175-181
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6297(199603/04)12:2<175::AID-AGR7>3.0.CO;2-#
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julian M. Alston & Colin A. Carter & Richard Green & Daniel Pick, 1990. "Whither Armington Trade Models?," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 72(2), pages 455-467.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peters, Glen, 2008. "Reassessing Carbon Leakage," Conference papers 331753, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    2. Janda, Karel & Rausser, Gordon C. & McCluskey, Jill, 1998. "Food import demand in the Czech Republic," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt14j5p75j, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    3. Lewis, Jeffrey D. & Robinson, Sherman & Wang, Zhi, 1995. "Beyond the Uruguay Round: The implications of an Asian free trade area," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 35-90.
    4. Satyanarayana, Vidyashankara & Wilson, William W. & Johnson, D. Demcey, 1997. "Import Demand For Malt: A Times Series And Econometric Analysis," Agricultural Economics Reports 23343, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    5. Sckokai, Paolo, 2001. "The Common Agricultural Policy In Econometric Models," Working Papers 14800, National Institute of Agricultural Economics, Italy - INEA, Osservatorio Sulle Politiche Agricole dell'UE.
    6. Fofana, Ismaël, 2011. "Simulating the Impact of Climate Change and Adaptation Strategies on Farm Productivity and Income: A Bio-economic Modeling Analysis," Conference papers 332110, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    7. James, Jennifer S. & Alston, Julian M., 2002. "Taxes and quality: A market-level analysis," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 46(3), pages 1-29.
    8. Hanrahan, Kevin F. & Westhoff, Patrick C. & Young, Robert E., II, 2001. "Trade Allocation Modeling: Comparing The Results From Armington And Locally Regular Ai Demand System Specifications Of A Uk Beef Import Demand Allocation Model," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20510, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    9. Wen S. Chern & Kimiko Ishibashi & Kiyoshi Taniguchi & Yuki Tokoyama, 2002. "Analysis of Food Consumption Behavior by Japanese Households," Working Papers 02-06, Agricultural and Development Economics Division of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO - ESA).
    10. Liapis, Peter S. & Krissoff, Barry & Neff, Liana, 1992. "Modeling Preferential .Trading Arrangements for the Agricultural Sector: A U.S.-Mexico Example," Staff Reports 278631, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    11. Mohanty, Samarendu & Peterson, E. Wesley F., 1999. "Estimation of Demand for Wheat by Classes for the United States and the European Union," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(2), pages 158-168, October.
    12. Andrew Muhammad & S. Aaron Smith & Tun‐Hsiang Edward Yu, 2021. "COVID‐19 and cotton import demand in China," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(1), pages 3-24, January.
    13. Wani, Mr. Nassir Ul Haq & Dhami, Dr. Jasdeep Kaur & Sidana, Dr. Neeru, 2016. "India's trade linkage with BRCS: An econometric study," MPRA Paper 81949, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 18 Mar 2017.
    14. McDonald, Bradley & Otradovsky, Miranda, 1991. "The Substituability of Imports From Different Sources: Empirical Estimates for U.S. Agriculture," WAEA/ WFEA Conference Archive (1929-1995) 321459, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    15. Davis, George C. & Jensen, Kimberly L., 1994. "Two-Stage Utility Maximization And Import Demand Systems Revisited: Limitations And An Alternative," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 19(2), pages 1-16, December.
    16. Kilkenny, Maureen, 1991. "Computable General Equilibrium Modeling of Agricultural Policies: Documentation of the 30-Sector FPGE GAMS Model of the United States," Staff Reports 278539, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    17. Devarajan, Shantayanan & Go, Delfin S. & Hongyi Li, 1999. "Quantifying the fiscal effects of trade reform," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2162, The World Bank.
    18. Yanagishima, Koji & Womack, Abner W., 1992. "Distorted U.S. Cotton Export Demand Under Textile Import Control," WAEA/ WFEA Conference Archive (1929-1995) 321378, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    19. Hansen, James Mark, 2000. "Agricultural and trade policy reform in Mexico: PROCAMPO, NAFTA, and pre-GATT," ISU General Staff Papers 2000010108000014902, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    20. Wilson, William W., 1994. "Demand For Wheat Classes By Pacific Rim Countries," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 19(1), pages 1-13, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:12:y:1996:i:2:p:175-181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6297 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.