IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/remava/v29y2021i2p97-106n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Management in Business Valuation in the Context of Digital Transformation

Author

Listed:
  • Pupentsova Svetlana V.

    (Institute of Industrial Management, Economics and Trade Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University)

  • Gromova Elizaveta A.

    (Institute of Industrial Management, Economics and Trade Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University)

Abstract

The paper deals with business valuation in unstable conditions of the external environment. Economic recession and the need for digital transformation is coming to the fore in Russia. As a result of this, the valuation of assets and business acquires additional complexity and issues related to effective risk assessment become relevant. The main objective of this paper is to offer non-traditional methods of risk assessment for business valuation at the moment. The qualitative and quantitative risk analysis will help to improve the quality of the assessment reports of the property in an unstable period. The paper focuses on the non-traditional methods of risk assessment (Monte Carlo method, game theory) which must be used in determining the market value of the object of assessment in the current time. A practical example of using the simulation modeling method is given in detail. Summarizing, the use of the simulation modeling method for calculating the market value of the appraisal object will provide additional (compared to the standard method) information and increase the reliability of the results. Moreover, in the period of the coronavirus pandemic, this paper becomes even more relevant and important, seeing as how uncertainty is becoming inherent in countries around the world. Thus, this study is of value to researchers in the field of economic modeling and appraisers across the globe.

Suggested Citation

  • Pupentsova Svetlana V. & Gromova Elizaveta A., 2021. "Risk Management in Business Valuation in the Context of Digital Transformation," Real Estate Management and Valuation, Sciendo, vol. 29(2), pages 97-106, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:remava:v:29:y:2021:i:2:p:97-106:n:6
    DOI: 10.2478/remav-2021-0016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/remav-2021-0016
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/remav-2021-0016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:ers:journl:v:xx:y:2017:i:2b:p:397-411 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Kęstutis Peleckis, 2015. "The Use of Game Theory for Making Rational Decisions in Business Negotiations: A Conceptual Model," Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, Centre for Strategic and International Entrepreneurship at the Cracow University of Economics., vol. 3(4), pages 105-121.
    3. Danielsson, Jon & James, Kevin R. & Valenzuela, Marcela & Zer, Ilknur, 2016. "Model risk of risk models," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 79-91.
    4. A. Maron & M. Maron, 2019. "Minimizing the Maximum Risk of Currency Conversion for a Company Buying Abroad," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 59-67.
    5. Olga Romanova, 2018. "Industrial Policy Priorities of Russia in the Context of Challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Part 1," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(2), pages 420-432.
    6. Alvin E. Roth & Robert B. Wilson, 2019. "How Market Design Emerged from Game Theory: A Mutual Interview," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 33(3), pages 118-143, Summer.
    7. Helena Gaspars-Wieloch, 2018. "The Impact of the Structure of the Payoff Matrix on the Final Decision made Under Uncertainty," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 35(01), pages 1-27, February.
    8. Alexander Chursin & Yuri Vlasov & Yury Makarov, 2017. "Innovation as a Basis for Competitiveness," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-319-40600-8, June.
    9. Olga Romanova, 2018. "Industrial Policy Priorities of Russia in the Context of Challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Part 2," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(3), pages 806-819.
    10. Liudmila Vasilevna Nikolova & Dmitriy Grigorievich Rodionov & Natalya Vladimirovna Afanasyeva, 2017. "Impact of Globalization on Innovation project Risks Estimation," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2B), pages 396-410.
    11. Filippo Curti & Ibrahim Ergen & Minh Le & Marco Migueis & Rob T. Stewart, 2016. "Benchmarking Operational Risk Models," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2016-070, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xueyang Wang & Xiumei Sun & Haotian Zhang & Chaokai Xue, 2022. "Digital Economy Development and Urban Green Innovation CA-Pability: Based on Panel Data of 274 Prefecture-Level Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Rosa Ferrentino & Luca Vota, 2022. "A Mathematical Model for the Pricing of Derivative Financial Products: the Role of the Banking Supervision and of the Model Risk," Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 11(1), pages 1-2.
    3. Fernández-Aguado, Pilar Gómez & Martínez, Eduardo Trigo & Ruíz, Rafael Moreno & Ureña, Antonio Partal, 2022. "Evaluation of European Deposit Insurance Scheme funding based on risk analysis," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 234-247.
    4. Václav Brož & Lukáš Pfeifer, 2021. "Are risk weights of banks in the Czech Republic procyclical? Evidence from wavelet analysis," Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, Central bank of Montenegro, vol. 10(1), pages 113-139.
    5. Marina Brogi & Valentina Lagasio & Luca Riccetti, 2021. "Systemic risk measurement: bucketing global systemically important banks," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 319-351, September.
    6. Mohammed Berkhouch & Fernanda Maria Müller & Ghizlane Lakhnati & Marcelo Brutti Righi, 2022. "Deviation-Based Model Risk Measures," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 59(2), pages 527-547, February.
    7. Seyed Mohammad Sina Seyfi & Azin Sharifi & Hamidreza Arian, 2020. "Portfolio Risk Measurement Using a Mixture Simulation Approach," Papers 2011.07994, arXiv.org.
    8. Dridi, Ichrak & Boughrara, Adel, 2021. "On the effect of full-fledged IT adoption on stock returns and their conditional volatility: Evidence from propensity score matching," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 179-194.
    9. Farkas, Walter & Fringuellotti, Fulvia & Tunaru, Radu, 2020. "A cost-benefit analysis of capital requirements adjusted for model risk," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    10. Dai, Yun-Shi & Dai, Peng-Fei & Zhou, Wei-Xing, 2023. "Tail dependence structure and extreme risk spillover effects between the international agricultural futures and spot markets," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    11. Malgorzata Mikita, 2022. "The Interrelationship Among Efficiency and Concentration of Banking System and its Stability: Evidence from Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 670-689.
    12. Evaggelia Siopi & Thomas Poufinas & James Ming Chen & Charalampos Agiropoulos, 2023. "Can Regulation Affect the Solvency of Insurers? New Evidence from European Insurers," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 29(1), pages 15-30, May.
    13. C. Alexander & M. Coulon & Y. Han & X. Meng, 2024. "Evaluating the discrimination ability of proper multi-variate scoring rules," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 334(1), pages 857-883, March.
    14. Bevilacqua, Mattia & Tunaru, Radu & Vioto, Davide, 2020. "Options-based systemic risk, financial distress, and macroeconomic downturns," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118850, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Michael Funke & Rongrong Sun & Linxu Zhu, 2022. "The credit risk of Chinese households: A micro‐level assessment," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 254-276, August.
    16. Mariano González-Sánchez & Eva M. Ibáñez Jiménez & Ana I. Segovia San Juan, 2022. "Market and model risks: a feasible joint estimate methodology," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(3), pages 187-213, September.
    17. Denisa Banulescu-Radu & Christophe Hurlin & Jérémy Leymarie & Olivier Scaillet, 2021. "Backtesting Marginal Expected Shortfall and Related Systemic Risk Measures," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5730-5754, September.
    18. Tasneem Bani-Mustafa & Nicola Pedroni & Enrico Zio & Dominique Vasseur & Francois Beaudouin, 2020. "A hierarchical tree-based decision-making approach for assessing the relative trustworthiness of risk assessment models," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(6), pages 748-763, December.
    19. E.V. Popov, 2021. "Drivers of the Economy in the Context of the Coronavirus Pandemic," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 20(1), pages 5-30.
    20. Viktor Dementiev, 2019. "Productivity Paradox in Regional Dimension," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 43-56.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    business valuation; market value; risks; simulation modeling method; Russian economy; digital transformation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C5 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:remava:v:29:y:2021:i:2:p:97-106:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.