IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/organi/v55y2022i1p64-76n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Employee Participation in the Decision-Making Process and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Mediating Role of Affective Commitment

Author

Listed:
  • Knezović Emil

    (International University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina)

  • Smajić Hamza

    (International University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this article is to examine the relationship between employee participation in the decision-making process (EPDMP) and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) while considering the mediating role of affective commitment (AC). Methods: The article is based on primary cross-sectional data collected using questionnaires and applying a convenience sampling method among employees in Bosnia and Herzegovina (B&H). The sample consists of 302 employees from 127 companies across multiple industries. Results: First, there is a positive relationship between EPDMP and two dimensions of OCB – organizational citizenship behavior directed at individuals (OCBI) and organizational citizenship behavior directed at the organization (OCBO). Second, the findings suggest that AC mediates the relationship between EPDMP and OCBI and OCBO. Furthermore, OCBI is found to mediate the relationship between AC and OCBO. Conclusion: This article extends the literature by introducing the mediating role of AC in the relationship between EPDM and two dimensions of OCB and the mediating role of OCBI in the relationship between AC and OCBO.

Suggested Citation

  • Knezović Emil & Smajić Hamza, 2022. "Employee Participation in the Decision-Making Process and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Mediating Role of Affective Commitment," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 55(1), pages 64-76, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:organi:v:55:y:2022:i:1:p:64-76:n:3
    DOI: 10.2478/orga-2022-0005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2022-0005
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/orga-2022-0005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christie, Andrew A. & Joye, Marc P. & Watts, Ross L., 2003. "Decentralization of the firm: theory and evidence," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 3-36, January.
    2. Emil Knezović & Senad Bušatlić & Ognjen Riđić, 2020. "Strategic human resource management in small and medium enterprises," International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 20(2), pages 114-139.
    3. Manish Kumar & Hemang Jauhari, 2016. "Employee Participation and Turnover Intention: Exploring the Explanatory Roles of Organizational Justice and Learning Goal Satisfaction," Working papers 204, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode.
    4. Vandekerkhof, Pieter & Steijvers, Tensie & Hendriks, Walter & Voordeckers, Wim, 2019. "The effect of nonfamily managers on decision-making quality in family firm TMTs: The role of intra-TMT power asymmetries," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 1-1.
    5. Paul Boselie, 2010. "High performance work practices in the health care sector: a Dutch case study," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(1), pages 42-58, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Venky Nagar, "undated". "Organizational Design Choices in Retail Banking," Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research Working Papers 09-99, Wharton School Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research.
    2. Yang, Tina & Zhao, Shan, 2014. "CEO duality and firm performance: Evidence from an exogenous shock to the competitive environment," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 534-552.
    3. Dongmin Kong & Ling Zhu & Ni Qin, 2022. "Does corruption shape firm centralisation? Evidence from state‐owned enterprises in China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(3), pages 3365-3395, September.
    4. Sauro Mocetti & Marcello Pagnini & Enrico Sette, 2017. "Information Technology and Banking Organization," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 51(3), pages 313-338, June.
    5. Michael Raith, 2008. "Specific knowledge and performance measurement," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 39(4), pages 1059-1079, December.
    6. Gregorio Sánchez-Marín & Gabriel Lozano-Reina & Mané Beglaryan, 2022. "HRM Policies and SMEs Performance: The Moderating Role of CSR Orientation," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2022(1), pages 85-110.
    7. Jan Bouwens & Laurence Van Lent, 2007. "Assessing the Performance of Business Unit Managers," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(4), pages 667-697, September.
    8. Milota Vetráková & Lukáš Smerek & Katarzyna Włodarczyk & Ewa Mazur-Wierzbicka & Sandra Misiak-Kwit, 2021. "The implementation of personnel processes in Poland and Slovakia," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(4), pages 148-163, June.
    9. Paul, Salima & Boden, Rebecca, 2008. "The secret life of UK trade credit supply: Setting a new research agenda," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 272-281.
    10. Stefano Dughera, 2020. "Skills, preferences and rights: evolutionary complementarities in labor organization," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 843-866, July.
    11. Singh, Ramendra Pratap & Singh, Ramendra & Mishra, Prashant, 2021. "Does managing customer accounts receivable impact customer relationships, and sales performance? An empirical investigation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    12. Hoekx, Laura & Lambrechts, Frank & Vandekerkhof, Pieter & Voordeckers, Wim & Frank, Hermann, 2023. "The influence of familiness on decision-making quality in top management teams: The role of emotional dissonance and perceived team support," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 14(2).
    13. Bouwens, J.F.M.G. & van Lent, L.A.G.M., 2006. "Assessing the Performance of Business Unit Managers," Other publications TiSEM f83d0732-69e7-4b1c-87c2-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    14. Mercedes Rodríguez-Fernández & Juan Herrera & Carlos de las Heras-Rosas, 2021. "Model of Organizational Commitment Applied to Health Management Systems," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-21, April.
    15. Dutta, Sunil & Fan, Qintao, 2012. "Incentives for innovation and centralized versus delegated capital budgeting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 592-611.
    16. Zhu, Ling & Kong, Dongmin, 2022. "Does government transparency shape firm decentralization? Evidence from a natural experiment in China," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    17. Bornemann, Tobias, 2018. "Do transfer pricing rules distort R&D investment decisions?," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 233, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    18. Edwin Ricardo Flores-Hernández & María Luisa Rodero-Cosano & Ana Evelyn Perla-Cartagena, 2022. "Complexity of Family Businesses in El Salvador: A Structural Equation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, June.
    19. White, Michael & Bryson, Alex, 2018. "HPWS in the Public Sector: Are There Mutual Gains?," IZA Discussion Papers 11965, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    20. Migliori, Stefania & De Massis, Alfredo & Maturo, Fabrizio & Paolone, Francesco, 2020. "How does family management affect innovation investment propensity? The key role of innovation impulses," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 243-256.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:organi:v:55:y:2022:i:1:p:64-76:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.