IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/offsta/v30y2014i2p25n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing Survey and Sampling Methods for Reaching Sexual Minority Individuals in Flanders

Author

Listed:
  • Dewaele Alexis

    (Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium)

  • Caen Maya

    (Department of Sociology, Research team CuDOS, Ghent University, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium)

  • Buysse Ann

    (Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium.)

Abstract

As part of a large sexual health study, we used two different approaches to target Sexual Minority Individuals (SMIs). Firstly, we drew on a probability sample (1,832 respondents aged 14-80) of the Flemish population in Belgium. Secondly, we set up a targeted sampling design followed by an Internet survey. Our focus was to explore how two different sampling procedures and survey designs could lead to differences in sample characteristics. Results showed that for female SMIs (we excluded male SMIs from the analyses due to their low numbers) the population sample differed from the Internet sample in terms of sociodemographic characteristics (the latter included younger and more highly educated respondents) and scores on sexual orientation dimensions (the population sample included more respondents who didn’t identify as lesbian or bisexual but reported same-sex sexual experiences and desire). Respondents’ scores on sexual health indicators differed between the samples for two of the seven variables. We discuss implications for improving the quality and validity of nonrandom samples.

Suggested Citation

  • Dewaele Alexis & Caen Maya & Buysse Ann, 2014. "Comparing Survey and Sampling Methods for Reaching Sexual Minority Individuals in Flanders," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 30(2), pages 251-251, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:offsta:v:30:y:2014:i:2:p:25:n:6
    DOI: 10.2478/jos-2014-0016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2014-0016
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/jos-2014-0016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mercer, C.H. & Bailey, J.V. & Johnson, A.M. & Erens, B. & Wellings, K. & Fenton, K.A. & Copas, A.J., 2007. "Women who report having sex with women: British national probability data on prevalence, sexual behaviors, and health outcomes," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 97(6), pages 1126-1133.
    2. Matthias Schonlau & Arthur van Soest & Arie Kapteyn & Mick Couper, 2009. "Selection Bias in Web Surveys and the Use of Propensity Scores," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 37(3), pages 291-318, February.
    3. Nadine S. Koch & Jolly A.. Emrey, 2001. "The Internet and Opinion Measurement: Surveying Marginalized Populations," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 82(1), pages 131-138, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Divine Ikenwilo & Sebastian Heidenreich & Mandy Ryan & Colette Mankowski & Jameel Nazir & Verity Watson, 2018. "The Best of Both Worlds: An Example Mixed Methods Approach to Understand Men’s Preferences for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 11(1), pages 55-67, February.
    2. Crossley, Thomas F. & Fisher, Paul & Low, Hamish, 2021. "The heterogeneous and regressive consequences of COVID-19: Evidence from high quality panel data," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    3. Guzi, Martin & de Pedraza, Pablo, 2013. "A Web Survey Analysis of the Subjective Well-being of Spanish Workers," IZA Discussion Papers 7618, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Maciej Berȩsewicz & Dagmara Nikulin, 2021. "Estimation of the size of informal employment based on administrative records with non‐ignorable selection mechanism," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(3), pages 667-690, June.
    5. Stéphane Legleye & Géraldine Charrance & Nicolas Razafindratsima & Nathalie Bajos & Aline Bohet & Caroline Moreau, 2018. "The Use of a Nonprobability Internet Panel to Monitor Sexual and Reproductive Health in the General Population," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 47(2), pages 314-348, March.
    6. Heng Chen & Geoffrey Dunbar & Q. Rallye Shen, 2020. "The Mode is the Message: Using Predata as Exclusion Restrictions to Evaluate Survey Design," Advances in Econometrics, in: Essays in Honor of Cheng Hsiao, volume 41, pages 341-357, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    7. Hildebrand Sean, 2015. "Coerced Confusion? Local Emergency Policy Implementation After September 11," Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, De Gruyter, vol. 12(2), pages 273-298, June.
    8. Grewenig, Elisabeth & Lergetporer, Philipp & Simon, Lisa & Werner, Katharina & Woessmann, Ludger, 2018. "Can Online Surveys Represent the Entire Population?," IZA Discussion Papers 11799, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. Knox, Melissa A. & Oddo, Vanessa M. & Walkinshaw, Lina Pinero & Jones-Smith, Jessica, 2020. "Is the public sweet on sugary beverages? Social desirability bias and sweetened beverage taxes," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    10. Arthur van Soest & Arie Kapteyn, 2009. "Mode and Context Effects in Measuring Household Assets," Working Papers 200949, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    11. Lang, Megan & Ligon, Ethan, 2022. "SMS Surveys of Selected Expenditures," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt7p7336h5, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    12. Magdalena Smyk & Joanna Tyrowicz & Lucas van der Velde, 2021. "A Cautionary Note on the Reliability of the Online Survey Data: The Case of Wage Indicator," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 50(1), pages 429-464, February.
    13. Bruine de Bruin, Wändi & van der Klaauw, Wilbert & van Rooij, Maarten & Teppa, Federica & de Vos, Klaas, 2017. "Measuring expectations of inflation: Effects of survey mode, wording, and opportunities to revise," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 45-58.
    14. John Baker & John Playle & Pauline Nelson & Karina Lovell, 2010. "An evaluation of the impact of the recommendations of the Chief Nursing Officer’s (England) Review of Mental Health Nursing in Mental Health Trusts and Universities in England: findings from stage one," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(17‐18), pages 2590-2600, September.
    15. Chang, Tai-Wei, 2023. "An indispensable role in promoting the electric vehicle Industry: An empirical test to explore the integration framework of electric vehicle charger and electric vehicle purchase behavior," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    16. Kühne, Simon & Kroh, Martin, 2018. "Personalized Feedback in Web Surveys: Does It Affect Respondents’ Motivation and Data Quality?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 36(6), pages 744-755.
    17. Maroto, Michelle Lee & Pettinicchio, David & Lukk, Martin, 2021. "Working Differently or Not at All: COVID-19’s Effects on Employment among People with Disabilities and Chronic Health Conditions," SocArXiv yjfse, Center for Open Science.
    18. Fiore, M. & Gaviglio, A. & Demartini, E. & La Sala, P., 2018. "Sugarcoating Food Technologies and consumers’ acceptance of long-life fish," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 275971, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Richard Valliant & Jill A. Dever, 2011. "Estimating Propensity Adjustments for Volunteer Web Surveys," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 40(1), pages 105-137, February.
    20. Joel Martin & Michael Toczko & Emily Locke & Ryan McCarthy & Italia Milani & Nathalie Barrios & Samer Koutoubi & Jatin Ambegaonkar & Niyati Dhokai & Ali Boolani, 2022. "Influence of Grit on Physical Activity, Sitting Time and Dietary Behaviors: A Multi-Study Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:offsta:v:30:y:2014:i:2:p:25:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.