IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/morgsr/v81y2019i1p55-71n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Business, Government, Society and Science Interest in Co-Production by Relative Evaluation Using Google Trends

Author

Listed:
  • Puksas Andrius

    (PhD, head of Law and Public Procurement Office, Mykolas Romeris University, Lithuania. Ateities str. 20, LT-08303, Vilnius, Lithuania. Phone: +370 5 2714466.)

  • Gudelis Dangis

    (PhD, associate professor at Institute of Public Administration, Faculty of Public Governance, Mykolas Romeris University, Lithuania.; Ateities str. 20, LT-08303, Vilnius, Lithuania. Phone: +370 5 2740634.)

  • Raišienė Agota Giedrė

    (PhD, professor at Institute of Leadership and Strategic Management, Faculty of Public Governance, Mykolas Romeris University, Lithuania.; Ateities str. 20, LT-08303, Vilnius, Lithuania. Phone: +370 698 73190.)

  • Gudelienė Nomeda

    (PhD, head of Research Quality and Analysis Office, Research and Innovation Centre, Mykolas Romeris University, Lithuania.; Ateities str. 20, LT-08303, Vilnius, Lithuania. Phone: +370 5 2714452.)

Abstract

The article provides the theoretical analysis of co-production phenomenon. The interests in co-production and related concepts are examined applying the methods of Google Trends statistical analysis and information visualization. The activity of business, government, society and research sectors during the last five years are compared, the trends of interest change and the balance of inter-sectoral interest in co-production is assessed. The relative evaluation of interest in co-production indicates that the situation in different sectors is not the same – the asymmetry in interest in co-production prevails. The article concludes that cooperation between public sector organizations with private sector organizations and society in providing public service as well as cooperation between scientific research, methods and technologies is developed at a different rate thus hindering breakthrough on a larger scale.

Suggested Citation

  • Puksas Andrius & Gudelis Dangis & Raišienė Agota Giedrė & Gudelienė Nomeda, 2019. "Business, Government, Society and Science Interest in Co-Production by Relative Evaluation Using Google Trends," Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, Sciendo, vol. 81(1), pages 55-71, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:morgsr:v:81:y:2019:i:1:p:55-71:n:4
    DOI: 10.1515/mosr-2019-0004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/mosr-2019-0004
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/mosr-2019-0004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yann Algan & Fabrice Murtin & Elizabeth Beasley & Kazuhito Higa & Claudia Senik, 2019. "Well-being through the lens of the internet," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Stephen P Osborne & Zoe Radnor & Kirsty Strokosch, 2016. "Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services: A suitable case for treatment?," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(5), pages 639-653, May.
    3. Pestoff, 2014. "Collective Action and the Sustainability of Co-Production," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 383-401, April.
    4. Huanming Wang & Wei Xiong & Guangdong Wu & Dajian Zhu, 2018. "Public–private partnership in Public Administration discipline: a literature review," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 293-316, February.
    5. Mei Xue & Patrick T. Harker, 2003. "Service Co-Production, Customer Efficiency and Market Competition," Center for Financial Institutions Working Papers 03-03, Wharton School Center for Financial Institutions, University of Pennsylvania.
    6. Benedikt Maas, 2020. "Short‐term forecasting of the US unemployment rate," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(3), pages 394-411, April.
    7. Germà Bel & Robert Hebdon & Mildred Warner, 2018. "Beyond privatisation and cost savings: alternatives for local government reform," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 173-182, March.
    8. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/63csdfkqvu9nfanvuffe3qk8r6 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. William Voorberg & Victor Bekkers & Sophie Flemig & Krista Timeus & Piret Tõnurist & Lars Tummers, 2017. "Does co-creation impact public service delivery? The importance of state and governance traditions," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(5), pages 365-372, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tina Jukić & Primož Pevcin & Jože Benčina & Mitja Dečman & Sanja Vrbek, 2019. "Collaborative Innovation in Public Administration: Theoretical Background and Research Trends of Co-Production and Co-Creation," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Rocco Palumbo & Stefania Vezzosi & Paola Picciolli & Alessandro Landini & Carmela Annarumma & Rosalba Manna, 2018. "Fostering organizational change through co-production. Insights from an Italian experience," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 15(3), pages 371-391, September.
    3. Anna Francesca Pattaro & Marco Ranuzzini & Luca Bonacini, 2019. "Inter-municipal cooperation as a solution for public services delivery? The case of Unioni di Comuni in Emilia-Romagna Region," Department of Economics 0144, University of Modena and Reggio E., Faculty of Economics "Marco Biagi".
    4. Aldona Frączkiewicz-Wronka & Martyna Wronka-Pośpiech, 2018. "How Practices of Managing Partnerships Contributes to the Value Creation—Public–Social Partnership Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-25, December.
    5. Jacob Torfing & Eva Sørensen, 2019. "Interactive Political Leadership in Theory and Practice: How Elected Politicians May Benefit from Co-Creating Public Value Outcomes," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Rossouw, Stephanie & Greyling, Talita & Adhikari, Tamanna & Morrison, Phillip S., 2020. "Markov switching models for happiness during a pandemic: The New-Zealand experience," GLO Discussion Paper Series 573, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    7. Vicente Alcaraz Carrillo de Albornoz & Antonio Lara Galera & Juan Molina Millán & Belén Muñoz Medina, 2023. "Public–Private Partnerships: Left or Right Government Economic Policy?," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1523-1544, December.
    8. Luo, Lanlan & Zou, Ziran & Chen, Shou, 2021. "Discounting for public-private partnership projects in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 218-226.
    9. Greyling, Talita & Rossouw, Stephanie & Adhikari, Tamanna, 2020. "A tale of three countries: How did Covid-19 lockdown impact happiness?," GLO Discussion Paper Series 584, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    10. Katrin Martens & Sebastian Rogga & Jana Zscheischler & Bernd Pölling & Andreas Obersteg & Annette Piorr, 2022. "Classifying New Hybrid Cooperation Models for Short Food-Supply Chains—Providing a Concept for Assessing Sustainability Transformation in the Urban-Rural Nexus," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, April.
    11. Fulvio Castellacci & Henrik Schwabe, 2020. "Internet, unmet aspirations and the U-shape of life," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, June.
    12. Md Altab Hossin & Jie Du & Lei Mu & Isaac Owusu Asante, 2023. "Big Data-Driven Public Policy Decisions: Transformation Toward Smart Governance," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    13. Xiaohan Li & Yang Lv & Md Nazirul Islam Sarker & Xun Zeng, 2022. "Assessment of Critical Diffusion Factors of Public–Private Partnership and Social Policy: Evidence from Mainland Prefecture-Level Cities in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, February.
    14. Pwint Kay Khine & Jianing Mi & Raza Shahid, 2021. "A Comparative Analysis of Co-Production in Public Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, June.
    15. Manuel Alméstar & Sara Romero-Muñoz & Nieves Mestre & Uriel Fogué & Eva Gil & Amanda Masha, 2023. "(Un)Likely Connections between (Un)Likely Actors in the Art/NBS Co-Creation Process: Application of KREBS Cycle of Creativity to the Cyborg Garden Project," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-25, May.
    16. Chen, Bin & Maung, Kenwin, 2023. "Time-varying forecast combination for high-dimensional data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 237(2).
    17. Mercer-Mapstone, Lucy & Rifkin, Will & Moffat, Kieren & Louis, Winnifred, 2017. "Conceptualising the role of dialogue in social licence to operate," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 137-146.
    18. Sebastian Zwalf, 2022. "Managing goal conflict. The case of agency theory in the policy settings for public–private partnerships; A perspective on citizen and government interests," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(4), pages 913-930, December.
    19. Nicole B. Baker & Christian Haddad, 2024. "Private ownership and management control decisions in infrastructure from the perspective of Transaction Cost Theory: Evidence from emerging economies," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 764-791, July.
    20. Buics, László & Eisinger Balassa, Boglárka, 2020. "Analyzing Public Service Processes from Customer and Employee Perspectives by Using Service Blueprinting and Business Process Modelling," Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (2020), Virtual Conference, in: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Virtual Conference, 10-12 September 2020, pages 195-211, IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:morgsr:v:81:y:2019:i:1:p:55-71:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.