IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/logitl/v15y2024i1p85-96n1008.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Classification of Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Concentrations Using Feature Selection and Machine Learning Strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Matara Caroline Mongina

    (University of Nairobi, Department of Civil & Construction Engineering, P.O. Box 30197-00100, Nairobi, Kenya)

  • Nyambane Simpson Osano

    (University of Nairobi, Department of Civil & Construction Engineering, P.O. Box 30197-00100, Nairobi, Kenya)

  • Yusuf Amir Okeyo

    (University of Nairobi, Department of Chemistry, P.O. Box 30197-00100, Nairobi, Kenya)

  • Ochungo Elisha Akech

    (Multimedia University, Department of Civil, Faculty of Engineering and Technology (FoET), P.O BOX 15653-00503 Nairobi, Kenya)

  • Khattak Afaq

    (Tongji University, College of Transportation Engineering, 4800 Cao’an Highway, Jiading District, Shanghai 201804, China)

Abstract

This research employed machine learning approaches to classify acceptable or non-acceptable particulate matter (PM2.5) concentrations using a dataset that was obtained from the Nairobi expressway road corridor. The dataset contained air quality data, traffic volume, and meteorological data. The Boruta Algorithm (BA) was utilized in conjunction with the Random Forests (RF) classifier to select the most appropriate features from the dataset. The findings of the BA analysis indicated that humidity was the most influential factor in determining air quality. This was closely followed by the variables of ‘day_of_week’ and the volume of traffic bound for Nairobi. The temperature of the site was determined to have a lower significance. The comparison among different machine learning classifiers for the classification of acceptable and unacceptable PM2.5 concentrations revealed that the Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) classifier displayed superior performance in terms of Sensitivity (0.774), Specificity (0.943), F1-Score (0.833), and AU-ROC (0.874). The Binary Logistic Regression (BLR) model demonstrated comparatively poorer performance in terms of Sensitivity (0.244), Specificity (0.614), F1-Score (0.455), and AU-ROC (0.508) when compared to other ML models. The prediction of PM2.5 has the potential to provide valuable insights to transport policymakers in their deliberations on urban transport policy formulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Matara Caroline Mongina & Nyambane Simpson Osano & Yusuf Amir Okeyo & Ochungo Elisha Akech & Khattak Afaq, 2024. "Classification of Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Concentrations Using Feature Selection and Machine Learning Strategies," LOGI – Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 85-96.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:logitl:v:15:y:2024:i:1:p:85-96:n:1008
    DOI: 10.2478/logi-2024-0008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/logi-2024-0008
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/logi-2024-0008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kursa, Miron B. & Rudnicki, Witold R., 2010. "Feature Selection with the Boruta Package," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 36(i11).
    2. Mohammed Hashim Ameen & Huda Jamal Jumaah & Bahareh Kalantar & Naonori Ueda & Alfian Abdul Halin & Abdullah Saeb Tais & Sarah Jamal Jumaah, 2021. "Evaluation of PM2.5 Particulate Matter and Noise Pollution in Tikrit University Based on GIS and Statistical Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-14, August.
    3. Gérard Biau & Erwan Scornet, 2016. "A random forest guided tour," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 25(2), pages 197-227, June.
    4. Spyros Makridakis & Evangelos Spiliotis & Vassilios Assimakopoulos & Artemios-Anargyros Semenoglou & Gary Mulder & Konstantinos Nikolopoulos, 2023. "Statistical, machine learning and deep learning forecasting methods: Comparisons and ways forward," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(3), pages 840-859, March.
    5. Antonio Mucherino & Petraq J. Papajorgji & Panos M. Pardalos, 2009. "k-Nearest Neighbor Classification," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, in: Data Mining in Agriculture, chapter 0, pages 83-106, Springer.
    6. P. Filliger & M. Herry & F. Horak & V. Puybonnieux-Texier & P. Quenel & J. Schneider & R.K. Seethaler & J.C. Vernaud & H. Sommer & N. Künzli & R. Kaiser & S. Medina & M. Studnicka & Olivier Chanel, 2000. "Public-health impact of outdoor and traffic-related air pollution: a European assessment," Post-Print hal-01462907, HAL.
    7. Gérard Biau & Erwan Scornet, 2016. "Rejoinder on: A random forest guided tour," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 25(2), pages 264-268, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manuel J. García Rodríguez & Vicente Rodríguez Montequín & Francisco Ortega Fernández & Joaquín M. Villanueva Balsera, 2019. "Public Procurement Announcements in Spain: Regulations, Data Analysis, and Award Price Estimator Using Machine Learning," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-20, November.
    2. Dai, Hongyan & Xiao, Qin & Chen, Songlin & Zhou, Weihua, 2023. "Data-driven demand forecast for O2O operations: An adaptive hierarchical incremental approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    3. Hou, Lei & Elsworth, Derek & Zhang, Fengshou & Wang, Zhiyuan & Zhang, Jianbo, 2023. "Evaluation of proppant injection based on a data-driven approach integrating numerical and ensemble learning models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    4. Ma, Zhikai & Huo, Qian & Wang, Wei & Zhang, Tao, 2023. "Voltage-temperature aware thermal runaway alarming framework for electric vehicles via deep learning with attention mechanism in time-frequency domain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    5. Patrick Krennmair & Timo Schmid, 2022. "Flexible domain prediction using mixed effects random forests," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(5), pages 1865-1894, November.
    6. Sachin Kumar & Zairu Nisha & Jagvinder Singh & Anuj Kumar Sharma, 2022. "Sensor network driven novel hybrid model based on feature selection and SVR to predict indoor temperature for energy consumption optimisation in smart buildings," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(6), pages 3048-3061, December.
    7. Escribano, Álvaro & Wang, Dandan, 2021. "Mixed random forest, cointegration, and forecasting gasoline prices," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 1442-1462.
    8. Yigit Aydede & Jan Ditzen, 2022. "Identifying the regional drivers of influenza-like illness in Nova Scotia with dominance analysis," Papers 2212.06684, arXiv.org.
    9. Siyoon Kwon & Hyoseob Noh & Il Won Seo & Sung Hyun Jung & Donghae Baek, 2021. "Identification Framework of Contaminant Spill in Rivers Using Machine Learning with Breakthrough Curve Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-26, January.
    10. Yan, Ran & Wang, Shuaian & Du, Yuquan, 2020. "Development of a two-stage ship fuel consumption prediction and reduction model for a dry bulk ship," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    11. Yi Cao & Xue Li, 2022. "Multi-Model Attention Fusion Multilayer Perceptron Prediction Method for Subway OD Passenger Flow under COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
    12. Filmer,Deon P. & Nahata,Vatsal & Sabarwal,Shwetlena, 2021. "Preparation, Practice, and Beliefs : A Machine Learning Approach to Understanding Teacher Effectiveness," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9847, The World Bank.
    13. Daniel Boller & Michael Lechner & Gabriel Okasa, 2021. "The Effect of Sport in Online Dating: Evidence from Causal Machine Learning," Papers 2104.04601, arXiv.org.
    14. Jorge Antunes & Peter Wanke & Thiago Fonseca & Yong Tan, 2023. "Do ESG Risk Scores Influence Financial Distress? Evidence from a Dynamic NDEA Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-32, May.
    15. Lyudmyla Kirichenko & Tamara Radivilova & Vitalii Bulakh, 2018. "Machine Learning in Classification Time Series with Fractal Properties," Data, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-13, December.
    16. Ivan Brandić & Lato Pezo & Nikola Bilandžija & Anamarija Peter & Jona Šurić & Neven Voća, 2023. "Comparison of Different Machine Learning Models for Modelling the Higher Heating Value of Biomass," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-14, April.
    17. José A. Ferreira, 2022. "Models under which random forests perform badly; consequences for applications," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 1839-1854, September.
    18. Villacis, Alexis & Badruddoza, Syed & Mayorga, Joaquin & Mishra, Ashok K., 2022. "Using Machine Learning to Test the Consistency of Food Insecurity Measures," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322472, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    19. Valeria D’Amato & Rita D’Ecclesia & Susanna Levantesi, 2022. "ESG score prediction through random forest algorithm," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 347-373, June.
    20. Pourkhanali, Armin & Khezr, Peyman & Nepal, Rabindra & Jamasb, Tooraj, 2024. "Navigating the crisis: Fuel price caps in the Australian national wholesale electricity market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:logitl:v:15:y:2024:i:1:p:85-96:n:1008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.