IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/hjobpa/v9y2018i2p7-22n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A holistic view of the organizational knowledge dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Brătianu Constantin

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania; Academy of Romanian Scientists, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to present a holistic view of the organizational knowledge dynamics, as an alternative to the current research focusing on different aspects of this complex and nonlinear phenomenon. Organizational knowledge is a semantic construct which has been developed as a result of growing importance of knowledge as a strategic resource, and it constitutes an integration of all forms of knowledge co-existing within an organization. Organizational knowledge varies in time and its dynamics is vital for organizational growth and for achieving a competitive advantage. Our approach is based on metaphorical thinking and on critical analysis of the present research concerning organizational knowledge and organizational intellectual dynamics. Going beyond the iceberg and stocks-and-flows metaphors, our research is based on the energy metaphor and the entropy law. The conceptual approach used and the final results obtained demonstrate the importance and utility of the holistic view in understanding more profoundly the complexity of the organizational knowledge dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • Brătianu Constantin, 2018. "A holistic view of the organizational knowledge dynamics," HOLISTICA – Journal of Business and Public Administration, Sciendo, vol. 9(2), pages 7-22, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:hjobpa:v:9:y:2018:i:2:p:7-22:n:1
    DOI: 10.2478/hjbpa-2018-0009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/hjbpa-2018-0009
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/hjbpa-2018-0009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Prencipe, Andrea & Tell, Fredrik, 2001. "Inter-project learning: processes and outcomes of knowledge codification in project-based firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(9), pages 1373-1394, December.
    2. Stefano Borgo & Giandomenico Pozza, 2012. "Knowledge objects: a formal construct for material, information and role dependences," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 227-236, September.
    3. Robert D Handscombe & Eann A Patterson, 2004. "The Entropy Vector," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: The Entropy Vector Connecting Science and Business, chapter 4, pages 34-49, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    4. Valentina Mihaela GHINEA & Constantin BRĂTIANU, 2012. "Organizational culture modeling," Management & Marketing, Economic Publishing House, vol. 7(2), Summer.
    5. Constantin BRATIANU & Ivona ORZEA, 2010. "Organizational knowledge creation," Management & Marketing, Economic Publishing House, vol. 5(3), Autumn.
    6. Guthrie, James & Ricceri, Federica & Dumay, John, 2012. "Reflections and projections: A decade of Intellectual Capital Accounting Research," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 68-82.
    7. Constantin BRĂTIANU & Sorin ANAGNOSTE, 2011. "The Role Of Transformational Leadership In Mergers And Acquisitions In Emergent Economies," Management & Marketing, Economic Publishing House, vol. 6(2), Summer.
    8. Bejinaru Ruxandra, 2017. "Knowledge strategies aiming to improve the intellectual capital of universities," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 12(3), pages 500-523, September.
    9. Ettore Bolisani & Alessandro Oltramari, 2012. "Knowledge as a measurable object in business contexts: a stock-and-flow approach," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 275-286, September.
    10. Ikujiro Nonaka, 1994. "A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 14-37, February.
    11. Constantin BRATIANU, 2015. "Developing Strategic Thinking in Business Education," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 3(3), pages 409-429, September.
    12. Robert D Handscombe & Eann A Patterson, 2004. "The Entropy Vector:Connecting Science and Business," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number 5365, September.
    13. Maurizio Zollo & Sidney G. Winter, 2002. "Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 339-351, June.
    14. Habersam, Michael & Piber, Martin & Skoog, Matti, 2013. "Knowledge balance sheets in Austrian universities: The implementation, use, and re-shaping of measurement and management practices," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 319-337.
    15. Constantin Bratianu & Simona Vasilache, 2010. "A factorial analysis of the managerial linear thinking model," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(4), pages 393-407.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bratianu Constantin, 2020. "From Thermodynamic Entropy to Knowledge Entropy," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 589-596, July.
    2. Bratianu Constantin, 2018. "Intellectual capital research and practice: 7 myths and one golden rule," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 13(2), pages 859-879, June.
    3. Bejinaru Ruxandra, 2017. "Knowledge strategies aiming to improve the intellectual capital of universities," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 12(3), pages 500-523, September.
    4. Constantin BRATIANU & Florina PINZARU, 2015. "Challenges for the University Intellectual Capital in the Knowledge Economy," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 3(4), pages 609-627, December.
    5. Rocco Frondizi & Chiara Fantauzzi & Nathalie Colasanti & Gloria Fiorani, 2019. "The Evaluation of Universities’ Third Mission and Intellectual Capital: Theoretical Analysis and Application to Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-23, June.
    6. Constantin BRATIANU & Ivona ORZEA, 2012. "Organizational Knowledge Creation In The Perspective Of Sustainable Development," Review of General Management, Spiru Haret University, Faculty of Management Brasov, vol. 15(1), pages 13-21, Mai.
    7. van Doren, Didi & Driessen, Peter P.J. & Runhaar, Hens A.C. & Giezen, Mendel, 2020. "Learning within local government to promote the scaling-up of low-carbon initiatives: A case study in the City of Copenhagen," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    8. Ruxandra BEJINARU, 2018. "Factorial Analysis Perspectives upon StudentsÂ’ Skills in the Knowledge Economy," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 6(2), pages 265-284, June.
    9. Hadad Shahrazad, 2017. "Strategies for developing knowledge economy in Romania," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 12(3), pages 416-430, September.
    10. Scaringella, Laurent & Burtschell, François, 2017. "The challenges of radical innovation in Iran: Knowledge transfer and absorptive capacity highlights — Evidence from a joint venture in the construction sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 151-169.
    11. Xiao Zhang & Luqun Xie & Jiatao Li & Li Cheng, 2022. "“Outside in”: Global demand heterogeneity and dynamic capabilities of multinational enterprises," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(4), pages 709-722, June.
    12. Pirozzi Maria Grazia & Agliata Francesco & Tuccillo Danilo & Pirozzi Francesco, 2021. "Defining the Integrated Performance Measurement Systems in Small and Medium Enterprises: An Advanced Model," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(12), pages 203-203, July.
    13. Hadia Baassiry, 2019. "Le management des compétences dans les pme innovantes : étude de cas au sein du secteur vitivinicole au Liban [Le Management Des Compétences Dans Les Pme Innovantes : Étude De Cas Au Sein Du Secteu," Post-Print hal-02868443, HAL.
    14. Zhong, Weiguo & Peng, Jisheng & Liu, Chunlin, 2013. "Internationalization performance of Chinese multinational companies in the developed markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2479-2484.
    15. John Dumay, 2015. "Forty-two," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(1), pages 21582440145, January.
    16. Alex Eapen & Rekha Krishnan, 2019. "Transferring Tacit Know-How: Do Opportunism Safeguards Matter for Firm Boundary Decisions?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 715-734, July.
    17. Maurizio Zollo, 2009. "Superstitious Learning with Rare Strategic Decisions: Theory and Evidence from Corporate Acquisitions," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(5), pages 894-908, October.
    18. Hong Y. Park & Hyejung Chang & Yong-Seung Park, 2015. "Firm’s knowledge creation structure for new product development," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 1023507-102, December.
    19. Hadia Baassiry, 2019. "Le management des compétences dans les PME innovantes : étude de cas du secteur vitivinicole au Liban," Post-Print hal-02068648, HAL.
    20. Fabio Blanco-Mesa & Omar Vinchira & Yesica Cuy, 2023. "Forgotten Factors in Knowledge Conversion and Routines: A Fuzzy Analysis of Employee Knowledge Management in Exporting Companies in Boyacá," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-35, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    knowledge creation; knowledge acquisition; knowledge loss; knowledge sharing; metaphors; organizational knowledge;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D58 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - Computable and Other Applied General Equilibrium Models
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:hjobpa:v:9:y:2018:i:2:p:7-22:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.