IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/eurcou/v11y2019i1p29-42n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Social Economy Selected Segments in The Slovak Republic

Author

Listed:
  • Chreneková Marcela

    (Department of Regional and Rural Development, Faculty of European Studies and Regional Development, Slovak University of Agriculture, Trieda A. Hlinku 2, 94976Nitra, Slovak Republic)

Abstract

The exclusion of individuals from the labour market directly affects the economic situation of their households. The main objective of the social economy is to address this situation. With the development of the social economy, efforts to assess its effects are intensified. The ambition of the paper is to express the extent of social economy in terms of rurality of regions of the Slovak Republic, identify its actors, sectors, where its entities operate and to illustrate both direct and indirect effects of the social economy. Industrial production is the most attractive sector for Slovak social enterprises. A small proportion of social enterprises operate in information, communication services and education. The largest number of sheltered workshops and workplaces operates in wholesale and retail trade and services related to sales. Geographical distribution of the social economy entities in Slovak districts (LAU 1) showed dependence of social economy intensity on rurality. Impact of a social enterprise is strongest in the local territory. However, single social enterprise can bring wide regional, national and even supranational effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Chreneková Marcela, 2019. "Effects of Social Economy Selected Segments in The Slovak Republic," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 29-42, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:eurcou:v:11:y:2019:i:1:p:29-42:n:3
    DOI: 10.2478/euco-2019-0003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2019-0003
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/euco-2019-0003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kittiya Yongvanich & James Guthrie, 2006. "An extended performance reporting framework for social and environmental accounting," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(5), pages 309-321, September.
    2. Liam Magee & Andy Scerri & Paul James & James Thom & Lin Padgham & Sarah Hickmott & Hepu Deng & Felicity Cahill, 2013. "Reframing social sustainability reporting: towards an engaged approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 225-243, February.
    3. Jacques Defourny & Marthe Nyssens, 2010. "Conceptions of Social Enterprise and Social Entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and Divergences," Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 32-53, March.
    4. Janelle A. Kerlin, 2012. "Defining Social Enterprise across Different Contexts: A Conceptual Framework Based on Institutional Factors," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Benjamin Gidron & Yeheskel Hasenfeld (ed.), Social Enterprises, chapter 4, pages 91-117, Palgrave Macmillan.
    5. Graham Hubbard, 2009. "Measuring organizational performance: beyond the triple bottom line," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(3), pages 177-191, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Darian McBain & Ali Alsamawi, 2014. "Quantitative accounting for social economic indicators," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 38(3), pages 193-202, August.
    2. Erik G. Hansen & Stefan Schaltegger, 2016. "The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard: A Systematic Review of Architectures," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(2), pages 193-221, January.
    3. Massimiliano Agovino & Massimiliano Cerciello & Antonio Garofalo & Loris Landriani & Luigi Lepore, 2021. "Corporate governance and sustainability in water utilities. The effects of decorporatisation in the city of Naples, Italy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 874-890, February.
    4. Rakesh Raut & Naoufel Cheikhrouhou & Manoj Kharat, 2017. "Sustainability in The Banking Industry: A Strategic Multi‐Criterion Analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 550-568, May.
    5. Satish Kumar & Weng Marc Lim & Riya Sureka & Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour & Umesh Bamel, 2024. "Balanced scorecard: trends, developments, and future directions," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(8), pages 2397-2439, August.
    6. Agnieszka Pacut, 2020. "Drivers toward Social Entrepreneurs Engagement in Poland: An Institutional Approach," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, January.
    7. Giorgio Mion, 2020. "Organizations with Impact? A Study on Italian Benefit Corporations Reporting Practices and Reporting Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, October.
    8. Carla Del Gesso, 2021. "An Entrepreneurial Identity for Social Enterprise across the Institutional Approaches: From Mission to Accountability toward Sustainable Societal Development," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, July.
    9. Barbara Bradač Hojnik & Katja Crnogaj, 2020. "Social Impact, Innovations, and Market Activity of Social Enterprises: Comparison of European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, March.
    10. Nghia Thi Thu Nguyen & Cheng-Tao Tang & Chun Yee Wong, 2021. "The Impacts of Social Enterprises on Labor Market Outcomes: Evidence from Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-13, September.
    11. Carlo Borzaga & Silvia Sacchetti, 2015. "Why Social Enterprises Are Asking to Be Multi-stakeholder and Deliberative: An Explanation around the Costs of Exclusion," Euricse Working Papers 1575, Euricse (European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises).
    12. M Ashraf Al Haq & Norazlina Abd Wahab & Md. Mahmudul Alam, 2021. "Understanding The Impact Of Institutional Factors On Asnaf Sustainability: A Pls-Sem Approach," Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, Bank Indonesia, vol. 7(4), pages 759-790, November.
    13. Lifshitz, Chen Chana, 2017. "Fostering employability among youth at-risk in a multi-cultural context: Insights from a pilot intervention program," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 20-34.
    14. Shr-Wei Kao & Pin Luarn, 2020. "Topic Modeling Analysis of Social Enterprises: Twitter Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, April.
    15. Eunsoo Choi & Eunji Kim & Inji Kim & Incheol Choi, 2020. "Attitude Toward Social Enterprises: A Comparison between For-Profit and Social Enterprise Employees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-10, March.
    16. Tanja Collavo, 2018. "Unpacking Social Entrepreneurship: Exploring the Definition Chaos and Its Consequences in England," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 14(2), pages 49-82.
    17. Daniar Siahaan & Sri Iswati & Amal Fathullah Zarkasyi, 2019. "Social Enterprise: The Alternatives Financial Support For Educational Institusion," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 9(3), pages 1-11.
    18. Chavatip Chindavijak & Kongkiti Phusavat & Pekka Kess & Suparerk Sooksamarn, 2016. "Transformation to Enterprise Sustainability Case Studies of Manufacturing and Service Enterprise in Thailand," Managing Innovation and Diversity in Knowledge Society Through Turbulent Time: Proceedings of the MakeLearn and TIIM Joint International Conference 2016,, ToKnowPress.
    19. Jan Petru & Vladislav Krivda, 2021. "An Analysis of Turbo Roundabouts from the Perspective of Sustainability of Road Transportation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-25, February.
    20. Peter M. Bednar & Christine Welch, 0. "Socio-Technical Perspectives on Smart Working: Creating Meaningful and Sustainable Systems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-18.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:eurcou:v:11:y:2019:i:1:p:29-42:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.