IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/buogeo/v41y2018i41p79-92n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The development of low-emission public urban transport in Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Taczanowski Jakub
  • Kołoś Arkadiusz
  • Gwosdz Krzysztof
  • Domański Bolesław
  • Guzik Robert

    (Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Faculty of Geography and Geology, Institute of Geography and Spatial Management, Gronostajowa 7, 30-387Kraków, Poland; phone +48 126 645 315, phone +48 126 645 318, phone +48 126 645 332, phone +48 126 645 335, phone +48 126 645 334)

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to identify the main factors and mechanisms behind the development of low-emission public transport vehicles in Polish cities. This innovation is primarily connected with growing environmental requirements for transport, with the EU environmental and transport policies being the key factors. However, strategies of local governments and municipal transport companies as well as the organization of urban transport - which differs significantly between cities - also play an important role. Three basic types of approach towards low-emission buses can be observed in Polish cities: tests of electric and hybrid vehicles, purchases of small quantities of buses in order to implement new solutions, and finally attempts to replace the majority or even the entire transport fleet with low-emission vehicles. It should be emphasised that an important element which affects the development of low emission public urban transport in Poland is the fact that the country has become one of the main bus producers in Europe - a fact which is a result of both large-scale foreign investments and the success of Polish manufacturers.

Suggested Citation

  • Taczanowski Jakub & Kołoś Arkadiusz & Gwosdz Krzysztof & Domański Bolesław & Guzik Robert, 2018. "The development of low-emission public urban transport in Poland," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 41(41), pages 79-92, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:buogeo:v:41:y:2018:i:41:p:79-92:n:5
    DOI: 10.2478/bog-2018-0027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/bog-2018-0027
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/bog-2018-0027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edwards, Marion & Mackett, Roger L, 1996. "Developing new urban public transport systems : An irrational decision-making process," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 225-239, October.
    2. Grenier, Agathe & Page, Shannon, 2012. "The impact of electrified transport on local grid infrastructure: A comparison between electric cars and light rail," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 355-364.
    3. Beirão, Gabriela & Sarsfield Cabral, J.A., 2007. "Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: A qualitative study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 14(6), pages 478-489, November.
    4. Bolesław Domański & Robert Guzik & Krzysztof Gwosdz & Arkadiusz Kołoś & Jakub Taczanowski, 2016. "European semi-periphery under environmental pressure: the case of urban public bus transportation and private bus-makers in Poland," International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(3), pages 301-318.
    5. Krzysztof Gwosdz & Robert Guzik & Bolesław Domański, 2011. "Environmental pressure in fragmented markets: the fall and rise of bus makers in Poland," Post-Print hal-03469224, HAL.
    6. Goldman, Todd & Gorham, Roger, 2006. "Sustainable urban transport: Four innovative directions," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 261-273.
    7. Banister, David, 2008. "The sustainable mobility paradigm," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 73-80, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. João Valsecchi Ribeiro de Souza & Adriana Marotti de Mello & Roberto Marx, 2019. "When Is an Innovative Urban Mobility Business Model Sustainable? A Literature Review and Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Kołoś, Arkadiusz & Taczanowski, Jakub, 2016. "The feasibility of introducing light rail systems in medium-sized towns in Central Europe," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 400-413.
    3. Pietro Lanzini & Andrea Stocchetti, 2017. "The evolution of the conceptual basis for the assessment of urban mobility sustainability impacts," Working Papers 02, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    4. Lorelei Schmitt & Alexa Delbosc & Graham Currie, 2019. "Learning to use transit services: adapting to unfamiliar transit travel," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 1033-1049, June.
    5. Quaglione, Davide & Cassetta, Ernesto & Crociata, Alessandro & Marra, Alessandro & Sarra, Alessandro, 2019. "An assessment of the role of cultural capital on sustainable mobility behaviours: Conceptual framework and empirical evidence," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 24-34.
    6. Alpkokin, Pelin & Ergun, Murat, 2012. "Istanbul Metrobüs: first intercontinental bus rapid transit," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 58-66.
    7. Justin Moskolaï Ngossaha & Raymond Houé Ngouna & Bernard Archimède & Mihaela-Hermina Negulescu & Alexandru-Ionut Petrişor, 2024. "Toward Sustainable Urban Mobility: A Multidimensional Ontology-Based Framework for Assessment and Consensus Decision-Making Using DS-AHP," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-22, May.
    8. Wael M. ElDessouki, 2022. "Development of a Neighborhood Mobility Index for Assessing Mobility Disparities in Developing Countries with Application to the Greater Cairo Area, Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, November.
    9. Marek Ogryzek & Daria Adamska-Kmieć & Anna Klimach, 2020. "Sustainable Transport: An Efficient Transportation Network—Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-14, October.
    10. Corazza, Maria Vittoria & Guida, Umberto & Musso, Antonio & Tozzi, Michele, 2016. "A new generation of buses to support more sustainable urban transport policies: A path towards “greener” awareness among bus stakeholders in Europe," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 20-29.
    11. Boussauw, Kobe & Vanoutrive, Thomas, 2017. "Transport policy in Belgium: Translating sustainability discourses into unsustainable outcomes," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 11-19.
    12. Mehrdad Bagheri & Miloš N. Mladenović & Iisakki Kosonen & Jukka K. Nurminen, 2020. "Analysis of Potential Shift to Low-Carbon Urban Travel Modes: A Computational Framework Based on High-Resolution Smartphone Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-26, July.
    13. Hemant Kumar Suman & Nomesh B. Bolia, 2019. "Mitigation of overcrowding in buses through bus planning," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 159-187, June.
    14. Hagen, Jonas Xaver & Pardo, CarlosFelipe & Valente, Johanna Burbano, 2016. "Motivations for motorcycle use for Urban travel in Latin America: A qualitative study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 93-104.
    15. Varvara Nikulina & David Simon & Henrik Ny & Henrikke Baumann, 2019. "Context-Adapted Urban Planning for Rapid Transitioning of Personal Mobility towards Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-37, February.
    16. Skeete, Jean-Paul, 2018. "Level 5 autonomy: The new face of disruption in road transport," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 22-34.
    17. David G Proffitt & Keith Bartholomew & Reid Ewing & Harvey J Miller, 2019. "Accessibility planning in American metropolitan areas: Are we there yet?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(1), pages 167-192, January.
    18. Nihit Goyal & Michael Howlett, 2018. "Technology and Instrument Constituencies as Agents of Innovation: Sustainability Transitions and the Governance of Urban Transport," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, May.
    19. Takumi Horiike & Kento Yoh & Kenji Doi & Chun-Chen Chou, 2023. "Assessing the Hierarchical Diversity of Public Transportation Considering Connectivity and Its Implication on Regional Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-20, December.
    20. Karzan Ismael & Szabolcs Duleba, 2021. "Investigation of the Relationship between the Perceived Public Transport Service Quality and Satisfaction: A PLS-SEM Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:buogeo:v:41:y:2018:i:41:p:79-92:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.