IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/bseaps/v14y2023i4p40-57.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The relationship between intensity of social media use activity and counterproductive workplace behaviors

Author

Listed:
  • Babasanda Florentina

    (Independent Researcher, Romania)

  • Ciobanu Alina

    (Independent Researcher, Romania)

  • Oancea Raluca

    (Independent Researcher, Romania)

  • Tănase TasenÈ›e

    (Ovidius University in Constanta, Faculty of Law and Administrative Sciences, Romania)

Abstract

The present paper brings to attention the dysfunctional behaviour in organisations in relation to the intensity of activity on social networks The present research aimed to identify the influences of the use of social networks on the occurrence of counterproductive behaviours in the workplace. It was based on 2 hypotheses: (1) it was assumed that there is a correlation between the use of the entertainment function in social networks and the occurrence of counterproductive behaviours at work and (2) the intensity of use of the social function of social networks correlates positively with the occurrence of counterproductive behaviours at work. The online questionnaire consisting of the Social Networking Activity Intensity Scale and the Counterproductive Behaviors Questionnaire (CWB-C) was completed by 30 people from Constanta County, aged 20-56 years. The results showed that the use of social networks within the limits of social function does not influence the development of counterproductive behaviors, while related to the intensity of social network use for entertainment purposes there is a positive correlation with the occurrence of certain counterproductive behaviors, such as sabotage and production-related deviance. The study did not find any correlations between the intensity of entertainment social network use and other dysfunctional behaviours such as theft and abuse. There were also no positive correlations between the age of respondents and the existence of dysfunctional behaviour in the workplace. In the future, it would be useful to use a larger sample size and to introduce variables such as the type of work performed.

Suggested Citation

  • Babasanda Florentina & Ciobanu Alina & Oancea Raluca & Tănase TasenÈ›e, 2023. "The relationship between intensity of social media use activity and counterproductive workplace behaviors," BlackSea Journal of Psychology, Ovidius University of Constanta, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, vol. 14(4), pages 40-57, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:tec:bseaps:v:14:y:2023:i:4:p:40-57
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://bspsychology.ro/index.php/BSJoP/article/view/264
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://bspsychology.ro/index.php/BSJoP/article/view/264/248
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yoav Vardi & Yoash Wiener, 1996. "Misbehavior in Organizations: A Motivational Framework," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(2), pages 151-165, April.
    2. Alice Labban & Lorenzo Bizzi, 2022. "Are social media good or bad for employees? It depends on when they use them," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 678-693, March.
    3. XiaoJuan Zhang & Xiang Jinpeng & Farhan Khan, 2020. "The Influence of Social Media on Employee’s Knowledge Sharing Motivation: A Two-Factor Theory Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stea, Diego & Foss, Nicolai J. & Christensen, Peter Holdt, 2015. "Physical separation in the workplace: Separation cues, separation awareness, and employee motivation," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 462-471.
    2. Imran Hussain, 2024. "How Ethical Ideology Exacerbates the Relationship Between Machiavellianism and Workplace Deviance," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 2, pages 53-61.
    3. Pnina Soffer & Nesi Outmazgin & Irit Hadar & Shay Tzafrir, 2023. "Why Work Around the Process? Analyzing Workarounds Through the Lens of the Theory of Planned Behavior," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 65(4), pages 369-389, August.
    4. Kristel Wouters & Jeroen Maesschalck & Carel Peeters & Marijke Roosen, 2014. "Methodological Issues in the Design of Online Surveys for Measuring Unethical Work Behavior: Recommendations on the Basis of a Split-Ballot Experiment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 120(2), pages 275-289, March.
    5. Robert Cialdini & Yexin Jessica Li & Adriana Samper & Ned Wellman, 2021. "How Bad Apples Promote Bad Barrels: Unethical Leader Behavior and the Selective Attrition Effect," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(4), pages 861-880, February.
    6. Maan Hussein Mansour & Hazem Khaled Shehadeh, 2021. "The Impact of Talent Management (TM) on Counterproductive Work Behaviors (CWB) in Industrial Companies in Jordan," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(7), pages 1-96, July.
    7. Raymond O. S. Zaal & Ronald J. M. Jeurissen & Edward A. G. Groenland, 2019. "Organizational Architecture, Ethical Culture, and Perceived Unethical Behavior Towards Customers: Evidence from Wholesale Banking," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(3), pages 825-848, September.
    8. Lian Tang & Siti Zobidah Omar & Jusang Bolong & Julia Wirza Mohd Zawawi, 2021. "Social Media Use Among Young People in China: A Systematic Literature Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, May.
    9. Aharon Tziner & Erich C. Fein, 2012. "Modeling employees' deviant behavior and employers' reactions: an interdisciplinary approach using principal-agent and prospect theories," Economics and Business Letters, Oviedo University Press, vol. 1(4), pages 10-20.
    10. Hagen Rafeld & Sebastian G. Fritz-Morgenthal & Peter N. Posch, 2020. "Whale Watching on the Trading Floor: Unravelling Collusive Rogue Trading in Banks," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(4), pages 633-657, September.
    11. Seraphim Voliotis, 2017. "Establishing the Normative Standards that Determine Deviance in Organizational Corruption: Is Corruption Within Organizations Antisocial or Unethical?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(1), pages 147-160, January.
    12. Katri Karjalainen & Katariina Kemppainen & Erik Raaij, 2009. "Non-Compliant Work Behaviour in Purchasing: An Exploration of Reasons Behind Maverick Buying," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 85(2), pages 245-261, March.
    13. Fareed Ul Hassan & Syed Abdul Waheed & Nadia Gilani, 2019. "Teachers Perspectives on Headteachers Mistreatment: Exploring the other Side of the Coin," Global Regional Review, Humanity Only, vol. 4(4), pages 350-359, December.
    14. Baur, John E. & Bradley, Bret H. & Bonner, Robert L., 2022. "Boiling frogs: Reconsidering the impact of deviance targets, severity, and frequency in teams," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 1026-1037.
    15. Kubilay Gok & John J. Sumanth & William H. Bommer & Ozgur Demirtas & Aykut Arslan & Jared Eberhard & Ali Ihsan Ozdemir & Ahmet Yigit, 2017. "You May Not Reap What You Sow: How Employees’ Moral Awareness Minimizes Ethical Leadership’s Positive Impact on Workplace Deviance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 146(2), pages 257-277, December.
    16. Adrian E. Tschoegl, 2005. "The Key to Risk Management: Management," Springer Books, in: Michael Frenkel & Markus Rudolf & Ulrich Hommel (ed.), Risk Management, edition 0, pages 721-739, Springer.
    17. Elizabeth E. Umphress & John B. Bingham, 2011. "When Employees Do Bad Things for Good Reasons: Examining Unethical Pro-Organizational Behaviors," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 621-640, June.
    18. Seriki, Olalekan K. & Nath, Pravin & Ingene, Charles A. & Evans, Kenneth R., 2020. "How complexity impacts salesperson counterproductive behavior: The mediating role of moral disengagement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 324-335.
    19. Hanifah Ihsaniyati & Sarwititi Sarwoprasodjo & Pudji Muljono & Dyah Gandasari, 2023. "The Use of Social Media for Development Communication and Social Change: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-35, January.
    20. Jeffrey B. Arthur, 2011. "Do HR System Characteristics Affect the Frequency of Interpersonal Deviance in Organizations? The Role of Team Autonomy and Internal Labor Market Practices," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 30-56, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Organizational behavior; work behavior; counterproductive behavior; maladaptive behavior at work; organizational productivity;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:bseaps:v:14:y:2023:i:4:p:40-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tanase Tasente (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.