IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v44y2010i8p919-934.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regional Variations in Public Service Outcomes: The Impact of Policy Divergence in England, Scotland and Wales

Author

Listed:
  • Rhys Andrews
  • Steve Martin

Abstract

Andrews R. and Martin S. Regional variations in public service outcomes: the impact of policy divergence in England, Scotland and Wales, Regional Studies. Analysis of statutory performance indicators reveals statistically significant differences between public service outcomes in England, Scotland, and Wales, even when controlling for other relevant variables. The most significant variations are in hospital waiting times and school examination results. Since health and education are the two largest services for which devolved administrations in Scotland and Wales now have direct responsibility, it is likely that these differences are attributable, at least in part, to policy divergence in the three countries since devolution in 1999. These variations, therefore, have implications for assessments of the impacts of devolution and public service reform strategies. [image omitted] Andrews R. et Martin S. La variation regionale des resultats des services publics: l'impact de la divergence entre les politiques menees en Angleterre, en Ecosse et au Pays de Galles, Regional Studies. Une analyse du tableau de bord officiel laisse voir statistiquemment d'importantes variations des resultats des services publics en Angleterre, en Ecosse et au Pays de Galles, tout en tenant compte d'autres variables pertinentes. Les variations les plus importantes concernent le delai d'attente a l'hopital et les resultats aux examens. Etant donne que la sante et l'education sont les deux services les plus grands, dont la responsabilite releve directemment des administrations regionalisees en Ecosse et au Pays de Galles, il est plus probable que ces variations s'expliquent, du moins en partie, par la divergence de politique dans les trois pays depuis la regionalisation en 1999. Par la suite, ces variations ont des implications quant a l'evaluation des impacts de la regionalisaton et pour les strategies visant la reforme des services publics. Resultats des services publics Variations geographiques Regionalisation du R-U Andrews R. und Martin S. Regionale Abweichungen bei den Ergebnissen offentlicher Dienstleistungen: die Auswirkung politischer Divergenz in England, Schottland und Wales, Regional Studies. Bei einer Analyse der gesetzlichen Leistungsindikatoren zeigen sich statistisch signifikante Unterschiede hinsichtlich der Ergebnisse der offentlichen Dienstleistungen in England, Schottland und Wales, selbst wenn man auf andere relevante Variable kontrolliert. Die wichtigsten Schwankungen finden sich bei den Wartezeiten von Krankenhausern sowie bei den Prufungsergebnissen in Schulen. Da es sich bei Gesundheit und Bildung um die beiden umfangreichsten Dienstleistungen handelt, fur die die Verwaltungen in Schottland und Wales seit der Dezentralisierung von 1999 zustandig sind, ist es wahrscheinlich, dass diese Unterschiede zumindest teilweise auf divergierende Politiken in den drei Landern zuruckzufuhren sind. Diese Abweichungen wirken sich somit auf die Bewertung der Auswirkungen der Strategien zur Dezentralisierung und zur Reform des offentlichen Dienstes aus. Ergebnisse bei offentlichen Dienstleistungen Raumliche Abweichungen Dezentralisierung in Grossbritannien Andrews R. y Martin S. Variaciones regionales en resultados de servicios publicos: el efecto de la divergencia politica en Inglaterra, Escocia y Gales, Regional Studies. En el analisis de los indicadores legales sobre el rendimiento se muestran diferencias estadisticamente significativas entre los resultados del servicio publico en Inglaterra, Escocia y Gales, incluso cuando estan controlados por otras variables relevantes. Las variaciones mas significativas se observan en los tiempos de espera de hospitales y los resultados de los examenes escolares. Dado que la salud y la educacion son los dos servicios mas importantes en los que los gobiernos descentralizados de Escocia y Gales tienen ahora una responsabilidad directa, es probable que estas diferencias se deban como minimo en parte a la divergencia de politicas en los tres paises desde la transferencia de competencias en 1999. Por consiguiente, estas variaciones influyen en las valoraciones sobre los efectos de la descentralizacion y en las estrategias de reforma en los servicios publicos. Resultados de servicios publicos Variaciones espaciales Transferencia de competencias en el RU

Suggested Citation

  • Rhys Andrews & Steve Martin, 2010. "Regional Variations in Public Service Outcomes: The Impact of Policy Divergence in England, Scotland and Wales," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(8), pages 919-934.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:44:y:2010:i:8:p:919-934
    DOI: 10.1080/00343400903401592
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343400903401592
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343400903401592?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Keating, 1998. "The New Regionalism in Western Europe," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1193.
    2. Loughlin, John, 2001. "Subnational Democracy in the European Union: Challenges and Opportunities," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198296799.
    3. Pollitt, Christopher & Bouckaert, Geert, 2004. "Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 2, number 9780199268498.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joan Costa‐Font & Laurie Perdikis, 2021. "Policy interdependence and the models of health care devolution: “Systems or federacies”?," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(3), pages 492-500, June.
    2. Rhys Andrews & George A. Boyne & Jennifer Law & Richard M. Walker, 2012. "Strategic Management and Public Service Performance," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-34943-8, December.
    3. Alistair Cole & Jean-Baptiste Harguindéguy & Ian Stafford & Romain Pasquier & Christian de Visscher, 2015. "States of Convergence in Territorial Governance," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 45(2), pages 297-321.
    4. Ayodele Asekomeh & Obindah Gershon & Smith I. Azubuike, 2021. "Optimally Clocking the Low Carbon Energy Mile to Achieve the Sustainable Development Goals: Evidence from Dundee’s Electric Vehicle Strategy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-23, February.
    5. Steve Martin & James Downe & Clive Grace & Sandra Nutley, 2013. "New development: All change? Performance assessment regimes in UK local government," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 277-280, July.
    6. Costa-Font, Joan & Perdikis, Laurie, 2019. "Policy interdependence and the models of health care devolution: “systems or federacies”?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 102200, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Lucyna Rajca, 2014. "Local Government Reforms under New Labour," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 0201504, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    8. Alex Law & Gerry Mooney, 2012. "Competitive Nationalism: State, Class, and the Forms of Capital in Devolved Scotland," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 30(1), pages 62-77, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Proinnsias Breathnach, 2014. "Creating City-region Governance Structures in a Dysfunctional Polity: The Case of Ireland’s National Spatial Strategy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(11), pages 2267-2284, August.
    2. Breathnach Proinnsias, 2019. "The Buchanan report and its aftermath: Implications for Irish regional planning," Administration, Sciendo, vol. 67(3), pages 41-63, August.
    3. Andy Pike & John Tomaney, 2004. "Subnational Governance and Economic and Social Development," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(12), pages 2091-2096, December.
    4. Benito Giordano & Elisa Roller, 2003. "A Comparison of City Region Dynamics in the UK, Spain and Italy: More Similarities than Differences?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(9), pages 911-927.
    5. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Adala Bwire, 2004. "The Economic (in)Efficiency of Devolution," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(11), pages 1907-1928, November.
    6. Hanna Bäck & Marc Debus & Jochen Müller & Henry Bäck, 2013. "Regional Government Formation in Varying Multilevel Contexts: A Comparison of Eight European Countries," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(3), pages 368-387, March.
    7. Dejan Stjepanović, 2015. "Territoriality and Citizenship: Membership and Sub-State Polities in Post-Yugoslav Space," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 67(7), pages 1030-1055, August.
    8. Michael Longo, 2003. "European Integration: Between Micro‐Regionalism and Globalism," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 475-494, June.
    9. Tóth, Balázs, 2021. "Milyen kapcsolatban állnak a közszféra reformjai a gazdaságpolitikai paradigmákkal? [How reforms of the public sector relate to the paradigms of economic policy]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 205-222.
    10. John Lovering, 2001. "The Coming Regional Crisis (And How To Avoid It)," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 349-354.
    11. Independent Evaluation Group, 2008. "Public Sector Reform: What Works and Why? An IEG evaluation of World Bank Support," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6484.
    12. Alessio Conti & Giovanni Vetritto, 2019. "ICT from Below: ELISA Program and the Innovation of Local Government in Italy," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 7(3), pages 70-92, May.
    13. repec:cuf:journl:y:2017:v:18:i:1:moreno-enguix is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Rebora, Gianfranco & Turri, Matteo, 2013. "The UK and Italian research assessment exercises face to face," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(9), pages 1657-1666.
    15. Ahmed Huque, 2013. "Can Public Management Contribute to Governance in Developing Countries?," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 397-409, December.
    16. Odeck, James & Høyem, Harald, 2021. "The impact of competitive tendering on operational costs and market concentration in public transport: The Norwegian car ferry services," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    17. van der Voet, Joris, 2014. "The effectiveness and specificity of change management in a public organization: Transformational leadership and a bureaucratic organizational structure," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 373-382.
    18. Melika Levelt & Leonie Janssen-Jansen, 2013. "The Amsterdam Metropolitan Area Challenge: Opportunities for Inclusive Coproduction in City-Region Governance," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(3), pages 540-555, June.
    19. Oliver Bruttel, 2005. "Are Employment Zones Successful? Evidence From the First Four Years," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 20(4), pages 389-403, November.
    20. Chanida Jittaruttha, 2017. "Public Trust and Governance in Public Administration in Thailand," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 5808123, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    21. Tom Christensen & Per Lægreid, 2008. "The Challenge of Coordination in Central Government Organizations: The Norwegian Case," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 97-116, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:44:y:2010:i:8:p:919-934. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.