IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/admini/v67y2019i3p41-63n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Buchanan report and its aftermath: Implications for Irish regional planning

Author

Listed:
  • Breathnach Proinnsias

    (Department of Geography, Maynooth University, Ireland)

Abstract

The so-called Buchanan report, commissioned by the Irish government and published in May 1969, comprised a set of proposals for regional industrial development in Ireland over the period 1966–86. The main thrust of the report was the concentration of the great bulk of new industrial employment creation in Dublin and eight proposed ‘growth centres’. The plan provided for the creation of powerful planning authorities to oversee development in the regions. The government rejected these proposals and opted instead to continue with the existing policy of widespread dispersal of new industry. While meeting with initial success, this policy proved unsustainable in the long term. The paper reviews the implications of the Buchanan report experience for the regional planning process in Ireland, arguing that failure to learn from this experience served to undermine the National Spatial Strategy, with a similar fate likely for the forthcoming National Planning Framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Breathnach Proinnsias, 2019. "The Buchanan report and its aftermath: Implications for Irish regional planning," Administration, Sciendo, vol. 67(3), pages 41-63, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:admini:v:67:y:2019:i:3:p:41-63:n:3
    DOI: 10.2478/admin-2019-0020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/admin-2019-0020
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/admin-2019-0020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Keating, 1998. "The New Regionalism in Western Europe," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1193.
    2. Loughlin, John, 2001. "Subnational Democracy in the European Union: Challenges and Opportunities," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198296799.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benito Giordano & Elisa Roller, 2003. "A Comparison of City Region Dynamics in the UK, Spain and Italy: More Similarities than Differences?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(9), pages 911-927.
    2. Proinnsias Breathnach, 2014. "Creating City-region Governance Structures in a Dysfunctional Polity: The Case of Ireland’s National Spatial Strategy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(11), pages 2267-2284, August.
    3. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Adala Bwire, 2004. "The Economic (in)Efficiency of Devolution," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(11), pages 1907-1928, November.
    4. Hanna Bäck & Marc Debus & Jochen Müller & Henry Bäck, 2013. "Regional Government Formation in Varying Multilevel Contexts: A Comparison of Eight European Countries," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(3), pages 368-387, March.
    5. Andy Pike & John Tomaney, 2004. "Subnational Governance and Economic and Social Development," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(12), pages 2091-2096, December.
    6. Rhys Andrews & Steve Martin, 2010. "Regional Variations in Public Service Outcomes: The Impact of Policy Divergence in England, Scotland and Wales," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(8), pages 919-934.
    7. Marius Constantin PROFIROIU & Carmen Valentina RADULESCU, 2019. "Local Development Opportunities In The Context Of Sustainable Development By Applying The Concept Of Smart Village In Romania," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(1), pages 1059-1067, November.
    8. James Hughes & Gwendolyn Sasse & Claire Gordon, 2002. "Saying `Maybe' to the `Return to Europe'," European Union Politics, , vol. 3(3), pages 327-355, September.
    9. Dejan Stjepanović, 2015. "Territoriality and Citizenship: Membership and Sub-State Polities in Post-Yugoslav Space," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 67(7), pages 1030-1055, August.
    10. Michael Longo, 2003. "European Integration: Between Micro‐Regionalism and Globalism," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 475-494, June.
    11. Rhys Jones & Mark Goodwin & Martin Jones & Glenn Simpson, 2004. "Devolution, State Personnel, and the Production of New Territories of Governance in the United Kingdom," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(1), pages 89-109, January.
    12. Malin Stegmann Mccallion, 2008. "Tidying Up? 'EU'ropean Regionalization and the Swedish 'Regional Mess'," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(4), pages 579-592.
    13. John Lovering, 2001. "The Coming Regional Crisis (And How To Avoid It)," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 349-354.
    14. Svensson, Bo, 2000. "The Scope And Potential Of Multi-Level Governance In Eu External Relations - Lessons From The Euro-Arctic," ERSA conference papers ersa00p54, European Regional Science Association.
    15. Lagendijk Arnoud & Velde Martin van der & Kuijpers Mark, 2020. "Looking for causes of effects in cases: Evaluating intermunicipal collaboration in The Netherlands applying QCA," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 64(3), pages 149-164, November.
    16. Joe Painter, 2013. "Regional Biopolitics," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(8), pages 1235-1248, September.
    17. Maria Teresa Balaguer-Coll & Diego Prior & Emili Tortosa-Ausina, 2010. "Devolution Dynamics of Spanish Local Government," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(6), pages 1476-1495, June.
    18. repec:rom:campco:v:9:y:2013:i:1:p:4-16 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Aron Buzogány & Umut Korkut, 2013. "Administrative Reform and Regional Development Discourses in Hungary. Europeanisation Going NUTS?," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 65(8), pages 1555-1577, October.
    20. Rune Dahl Fitjar & Einar Leknes & Janne Thygesen, 2013. "Europeanisation of Regional Policy Making: A Boolean Analysis of Norwegian Counties' Participation in the Eu's Interreg Programme," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(3), pages 381-400, June.
    21. Benito Giordano & Elisa Roller, 2004. "‘Té Para Todos’? A Comparison of the Processes of Devolution in Spain and the UK," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(12), pages 2163-2181, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:admini:v:67:y:2019:i:3:p:41-63:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.