IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v41y2007i9p1237-1251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Polycentric State: New Spaces of Empowerment and Engagement?

Author

Listed:
  • Kevin Morgan

Abstract

Morgan K. (2007) The polycentric state: new spaces of empowerment and engagement?, Regional Studies 41, 1237-1251. New Labour claims to have radically reformed territorial governance structures in the UK by devolving political power to the Celtic nations and London, begetting the most enduring legacy of the first Tony Blair government. More recently it has sought to extend its devolution agenda by embracing city-regionalism and the new localism, ostensibly to create new spaces of empowerment and engagement. But devolution is not the whole story of New Labour's attitude to power. On the contrary, this article argues that New Labour is a modern Janus because its commitment to devolving power, so clear in principle, is more equivocal in practice. Drawing on these three devolution narratives, it concludes by assessing the implications for the current debate about relational versus territorial readings of place politics. Morgan K. (2007) L'Etat multipolaire: de nouvelles espaces ou se donner du pouvoir et s'engager?, Regional Studies 41, 1237-1251. Le New Labour pretend avoir radicalement reforme la gouvernance territoriale au R-U par la decentralisation du pouvoir politique aux nations celtes et a Londres, ainsi engendrant le legs le plus durable du premier gouvernement Tony Blair. Plus recemment, il a cherche a elargir son programme de decentralisation en adoptant les notions de cites-regions et de gouvernance locale, apparemment pour creer de nouvelles espaces ou se donner du pouvoir et s'engager. Toujours est-il que la decentralisation n'est pas toute l'histoire quant a l'attitude du New Labour a l'egard du pouvoir. Au contraire, cet article affirme que le New Labour est un Janus moderne, dans la mesure ou son engagement dans la decentralisation du pouvoir, si transparent soit-il en principe, s'avere plus ambigu en pratique. Puisant dans ces trois histoires de decentralisation, l'article conclut par une evaluation des implications pour le debat en cours sur les interpretations relationnelles et territoriales de la politique de l'endroit. Politique territoriale Decentralisation Cites-regions Nouvelle gouvernance locale Morgan K. (2007) Der polzentrische Staat: neue Raume fur Ermachtigung und Engagement?, Regional Studies 41, 1237-1251. Die New-Labour-Regierung behauptet, die territorialen Regierungsstrukturen Grossbritanniens durch eine Dezentralisierung der Regierungsgewalt in den keltischen Nationen und in London radikal reformiert und damit das dauerhafteste Vermachtnis der ersten Tony Blair-Regierung geschaffen zu haben. In jungster Zeit hat sie versucht, diese Dezentralisierung durch eine Ubernahme des Stadtregionalismus und neuen Lokalismus auszuweiten, vorgeblich zur Schaffung von neuen Platzen fur Ermachtigung und Engagement. Doch mit der Dezentralisierung ist die Einstellung von New Labour zur Macht nicht vollstandig beschrieben. Vielmehr wird in diesem Artikel die These aufgestellt, dass es sich bei New Labour um einen modernen Janus handelt, denn das im Prinzip so klare Engagement der Partei fur eine Dezentralisierung der Regierungsgewalt ist in der Praxis weniger eindeutig. Anhand der Beispiele dieser drei Dezentralisierungen werden im Artikel schliesslich die Auswirkungen auf die derzeitige Debatte uber eine relationale oder territoriale Interpretation der Raumpolitik untersucht. Raumpolitik Dezentralisierung Stadtregionen Neuer Lokalismus Morgan K. (2007) El estado policentrico: ¿Nuevos espacios de integracion y participacion?, Regional Studies 41, 1237-1251. El Gobierno del Nuevo Laborismo afirma haber reformado radicalmente las estructuras de gobernanza territoriales en el Reino Unido al transferir competencias a las naciones celtas y a Londres, generando el legado mas permanente del primer gobierno de Tony Blair. Hace poco ha intentado ampliar su agenda de transferencia de competencias al adoptar el regionalismo de las ciudades y el nuevo localismo, aparentemente para crear nuevos espacios de capacidad de poder y participacion. Pero la transferencia no es la historia completa de la actitud de poder del Nuevo Laborismo. En este articulo sostenemos mas bien que el Partido Laborista es un moderno Jano, puesto que su compromiso de transferir competencias, tan claro en principio, es mas equivoco en la practica. Sacando conclusiones de estos tres relatos sobre transferencia de competencias, en este articulo terminamos evaluando las repercusiones en el debate actual sobre la interpretacion relacional o territorial de la politica de lugar. Politica territorial Transferencia de competencias Ciudades-regiones Nuevo localismo

Suggested Citation

  • Kevin Morgan, 2007. "The Polycentric State: New Spaces of Empowerment and Engagement?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(9), pages 1237-1251.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:41:y:2007:i:9:p:1237-1251
    DOI: 10.1080/00343400701543363
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343400701543363
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343400701543363?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Keating, 1998. "The New Regionalism in Western Europe," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1193, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zao Sun & Chun-Ping Chang & Yu Hao, 2017. "Fiscal decentralization and China’s provincial economic growth: a panel data analysis for China’s tax sharing system," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(5), pages 2267-2289, September.
    2. Beall, Jo, 2020. "Whither the region? Re-thinking the space and place of regions and cities in international comparative perspective," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 102507, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Andy Pike, 2007. "Editorial: Whither Regional Studies?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(9), pages 1143-1148.
    4. Andy Pike & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & John Tomaney & Gianpiero Torrisi & Vassilis Tselios, 2010. "In Search of the 'Economic Dividend' of Devolution: Spatial Disparities, Spatial Economic Policy and Decentralisation in the UK," SERC Discussion Papers 0062, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    5. Danson Mike & Gordon MacLeod & Gerry Mooney, 2012. "Devolution and the Shifting Political Economic Geographies of the United Kingdom Introduction and Context," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 30(1), pages 1-9, February.
    6. Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose & Anne Krøijer, 2009. "Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in Central and Eastern Europe," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 387-417, September.
    7. Andy Pike & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & John Tomaney & Gianpiero Torrisi & Vassilis Tselios, 2012. "In Search of the ‘Economic Dividend’ of Devolution: Spatial Disparities, Spatial Economic Policy, and Decentralisation in the UK," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 30(1), pages 10-28, February.
    8. Sangeetha Chandrashekeran, 2016. "Multidimensionality and the multilevel perspective: Territory, scale, and networks in a failed demand-side energy transition in Australia," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(8), pages 1636-1656, August.
    9. Gordon Macleod & Martin Jones, 2007. "Territorial, Scalar, Networked, Connected: In What Sense a 'Regional World'?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(9), pages 1177-1191.
    10. Gill Bentley & Lee Pugalis, 2013. "New directions in economic development: Localist policy discourses and the Localism Act," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 28(3), pages 257-274, May.
    11. Bella Dicks, 2014. "Participatory Community Regeneration: A Discussion of Risks, Accountability and Crisis in Devolved Wales," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(5), pages 959-977, April.
    12. Anssi Paasi & Kaj Zimmerbauer, 2016. "Penumbral borders and planning paradoxes: Relational thinking and the question of borders in spatial planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(1), pages 75-93, January.
    13. Graham Haughton & Philip Allmendinger, 2015. "Fluid Spatial Imaginaries: Evolving Estuarial City-regional Spaces," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(5), pages 857-873, September.
    14. Mike Danson & Greg Lloyd, 2012. "Devolution, Institutions, and Organisations: Changing Models of Regional Development Agencies," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 30(1), pages 78-94, February.
    15. Danson, Michael & Todeva, Emanuela, 2016. "Government and Governance of Regional Triple Helix Interactions," MPRA Paper 76780, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Iain Docherty & Jon Shaw, 2011. "The Transformation of Transport Policy in Great Britain? ‘New Realism’ and New Labour's Decade of Displacement Activity," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(1), pages 224-251, January.
    17. ., 2014. "Devolution, city governance and economic performance," Chapters, in: Urban Economics and Urban Policy, chapter 7, pages 157-184, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. Wilmsmeier, Gordon & Monios, Jason, 2015. "The production of capitalist “smooth” space in global port operations," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 59-69.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dejan Stjepanović, 2015. "Territoriality and Citizenship: Membership and Sub-State Polities in Post-Yugoslav Space," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 67(7), pages 1030-1055, August.
    2. Michael Longo, 2003. "European Integration: Between Micro‐Regionalism and Globalism," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 475-494, June.
    3. John Lovering, 2001. "The Coming Regional Crisis (And How To Avoid It)," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 349-354.
    4. Melika Levelt & Leonie Janssen-Jansen, 2013. "The Amsterdam Metropolitan Area Challenge: Opportunities for Inclusive Coproduction in City-Region Governance," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(3), pages 540-555, June.
    5. lain Deas & Alex Lord, 2006. "From a New Regionalism to an Unusual Regionalism? The Emergence of Non-standard Regional Spaces and Lessons for the Territorial Reorganisation of the State," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(10), pages 1847-1877, September.
    6. Tassilo Herrschel, 2013. "Competitiveness AND Sustainability: Can ‘Smart City Regionalism’ Square the Circle?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(11), pages 2332-2348, August.
    7. Michael Keating, 2010. "Second Round Reform. Devolution and constitutional reform in the United Kingdom, Spain and Italy," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 15, European Institute, LSE.
    8. Di Novi, C. & Piacenza, M. & Robone, S. & Turati, G., 2015. "How does fiscal decentralization affect within-regional disparities in well-being? Evidence from health inequalities in Italy," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 15/23, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    9. A. J. Brown & Jacob Deem, 2016. "A Tale of Two Regionalisms: Improving the Measurement of Regionalism in Australia and Beyond," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(7), pages 1154-1169, July.
    10. Gordon Macleod & Martin Jones, 2007. "Territorial, Scalar, Networked, Connected: In What Sense a 'Regional World'?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(9), pages 1177-1191.
    11. Liesbet Hooghe, Gary Marks, 2002. "Types of Multi-Level Governance," Les Cahiers européens de Sciences Po 3, Centre d'études européennes (CEE) at Sciences Po, Paris.
    12. Sjoerd Beugelsdijk & Ton Van Schaik, 2005. "Differences in social capital between 54 Western European regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(8), pages 1053-1064.
    13. Maria Teresa Balaguer-Coll & Diego Prior & Emili Tortosa-Ausina, 2010. "Devolution Dynamics of Spanish Local Government," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(6), pages 1476-1495, June.
    14. Zsuzsa Csergő & Philippe Roseberry & Stefan Wolff, 2017. "Institutional Outcomes of Territorial Contestation: Lessons from Post-Communist Europe, 1989–2012," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 47(4), pages 491-521.
    15. Albin Olausson, 2020. "Legitimacy of uncertain policy work: Exploring values in local economic development projects," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 35(5), pages 440-459, August.
    16. Gulnara Shaikhutdinova, 2016. "Regionalism And Distribution Of Powers In Federal States," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 5, pages 138-149.
    17. Daniel Kübler & Jolita Piliutyte, 2007. "Intergovernmental Relations and International Urban Strategies: Constraints and Opportunities in Multilevel Polities," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 25(3), pages 357-373, June.
    18. Leonie Janssen-Jansen & Melika Levelt, 2005. "Borderless Space - Ideas for Regional Collaboration," ERSA conference papers ersa05p292, European Regional Science Association.
    19. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Roberto Ezcurra, 2010. "Does decentralization matter for regional disparities? A cross-country analysis," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(5), pages 619-644, September.
    20. Constantin Marius PROFIROIU & Alina PROFIROIU, 2013. "Recommendations for strengthening Regional Governance in Romania," Proceedings of Administration and Public Management International Conference, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 9(1), pages 4-16, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:41:y:2007:i:9:p:1237-1251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.