IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v34y2000i7p669-680.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Labour Market Policy as Flexible Welfare: Prototype Employment Zones and the New Workfarism

Author

Listed:
  • Graham Haughton
  • Martin Jones
  • Jamie Peck
  • Adam Tickell
  • Aidan While

Abstract

HAUGHTON G., JONES M., PECK J., TICKELL A. and WHILE A. (2000) Labour market policy as flexible welfare: prototype employment zones and the new workfarism, Reg. Studies 34, 669-680. This paper examines the evolution of the employability agenda of New Labour through the lens of one of its main policy vehicles for melding welfare reform and active labour market policies: Employment Zones. The transition from prototype to fully fledged Employment Zones is used to examine whether they represent a progression in 'joined up policy' and the ability to 'think the unthinkable' in bringing about an active benefits system. Our reading of the policy documentation suggests a reversal of some of the progressive tendencies within the prototypes, in particular signalled by the switch from voluntary to mandatory participation for clients. HAUGHTON G., JONES M., PECK J., TICKELL A. et WHILE A. (2000) Une politique en faveur de l'emploi en tant qu'une aide flexible:les prototypes des zones d'emploi et la nouvelle politique appell�e 'workfare', Reg. Studies 34, 669-680. Cet article cherch� a examiner le d�veloppement du programme de New Labour quant �la notion d'employabilit�par le canal de l'un de ses principaux v�hicules politiques qui vis�amêler la r�forme de la protection sociale aux mesures actives en faveur de l'emploi, �savoir les zones d'emploi. La transition de prototyp�azone d'emploìapart enti�re permet d'examiner si, oui ou non, elles constituent le d�veloppement de la notion de 'politique li�e' et de la capacit��'penser l'impensable' en amenant � un syst�me d'allocations actif. La documentation laisse supposer un renversement de quelques-unes des tendances progressives au sein des prototypes, ce qui est indiqu�notamment par le changement d'une participation volontair�aune participation obligatoire de la part des clients. HAUGHTON G., JONES M., PECK J., TICKELL A. und WHILE A. (2000) Arbeitsmarktpolitik als flexible Wohlfahrt: Prototyp Besch�ftigungszonen und der neue 'Werk'fahrtismus, Reg. Studies 34, 669-680. Dieser Aufsatz untersucht die Entwicklung des Ansteilbarkeitsprogramms der Neuen Labourpartei durch die Lupe einer der Haupttr�ger ihrer Politik zur Verschmelzung von Wohlfahrtsreform und aktiver Arbeitsmarktpolitik in Erwerbst�tigkeitszonen. Der �bergang von Prototyp zu fl�ggen Erwerbst�tigkeitszonen wird dazu benutzt, zu untersuchen, ob sie eine Aufw�rtsentwicklung in der 'Politik aus einem St�cke' darstellen, und die F�higkeit, 'das Undenkbare zu denken' ein aktives Sozialhilfesystem hervorbringt. Unser Verst�ndnis der Dokumentation bez�glich dieser Gruns�tze legt eine v�llige Umstellung mancher progressiven Tendenzen in den Prototypen nahe, deren hervorstechendstes Signal f�r Klienten die Umschaltung von freiwilliger zu zwangsweiser Teilnahme war.

Suggested Citation

  • Graham Haughton & Martin Jones & Jamie Peck & Adam Tickell & Aidan While, 2000. "Labour Market Policy as Flexible Welfare: Prototype Employment Zones and the New Workfarism," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(7), pages 669-680, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:34:y:2000:i:7:p:669-680
    DOI: 10.1080/00343400050178456
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00343400050178456
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343400050178456?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ivan Turok & David Webster, 1998. "The New Deal," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 12(4), pages 309-328, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Etherington & Martin Jones, 2004. "Beyond Contradictions of the Workfare State? Denmark, Welfare-through-Work, and the Promise of Job Rotation," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 22(1), pages 129-148, February.
    2. David O'Sullivan, 2009. "Changing Neighborhoods—Neighborhoods Changing," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 37(4), pages 498-530, May.
    3. Martin Jones & Anne Gray, 2001. "Social Capital, or Local Workfarism? Reflections on Employment Zones," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 16(3), pages 178-186, August.
    4. Oliver Bruttel, 2005. "Are Employment Zones Successful? Evidence From the First Four Years," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 20(4), pages 389-403, November.
    5. Graham Haughton & Rachel Naylor, 2008. "Reflexive Local and Regional Economic Development and International Policy Transfer," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 23(2), pages 167-178, May.
    6. William Mitchell & Sally Cowling, 2003. "False promise or false premise? Evaluating the job network," Australian Journal of Labour Economics (AJLE), Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), Curtin Business School, vol. 6(2), pages 207-226, June.
    7. Allan Cochrane & David Etherington, 2007. "Managing Local Labour Markets and Making up New Spaces of Welfare," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(12), pages 2958-2974, December.
    8. Colin M Mason & Sara Carter & Stephen K Tagg, 2006. "The Effect of the National Minimum Wage on the UK Small Business Sector: A Geographical Analysis," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 24(1), pages 99-116, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ian Shuttleworth & Anne Green, 2011. "Spatial Mobility Intentions, the Labour Market and Incapacity Benefit Claimants," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(5), pages 911-927, April.
    2. J Peck, 1999. "New Labourers? Making a New Deal for the ‘Workless Class’," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 17(3), pages 345-372, June.
    3. repec:rri:wpaper:201006 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. McVicar, D. & Podivinsky, J.M., 2007. "Does the impact of active labor market programs depend on the state of the labor market? The case of the UK new deal for young people," Discussion Paper Series In Economics And Econometrics 0704, Economics Division, School of Social Sciences, University of Southampton.
    5. Dr. Edward A. Fieldhouse & Dr. Virinder S. Kalra & Saima Alam, 2002. "How new is the New Deal? A qualitative study of the New Deal for Young People on minority ethnic groups in Oldham," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 17(1), pages 50-64, February.
    6. Alasdair Rae, 2012. "Spatial patterns of labour market deprivation in Scotland: Concentration, isolation and persistence," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 27(5-6), pages 593-609, August.
    7. Colin M Mason & Sara Carter & Stephen K Tagg, 2006. "The Effect of the National Minimum Wage on the UK Small Business Sector: A Geographical Analysis," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 24(1), pages 99-116, February.
    8. Duncan McVicar & Jan M. Podivinsky, 2010. "Are Active Labour Market Programmes Least Effective Where They Are Most Needed? The Case of the British New Deal for Young People," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2010n16, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
    9. P E Lloyd, 1999. "The Regional Development Agencies and Social Inclusion: Widening the Agenda," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 17(6), pages 701-713, December.
    10. Andrew Glyn & Stewart Wood, 2000. "New Labour`s Economic Policy," Economics Series Working Papers 49, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    11. David Smith, 2000. "Dealed out? Welfare to Work and Social Exclusion," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 15(4), pages 312-324, November.
    12. Kenneth Gibb & Liv Osland & Gwilym Pryce, 2014. "Describing Inequalities in Access to Employment and the Associated Geography of Wellbeing," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(3), pages 596-613, February.
    13. Mike Campbell, 2000. "Reconnecting the Long Term Unemployed to Labour Market Opportunity: The Case for a 'Local Active Labour Market Policy'," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(7), pages 655-668, October.
    14. Ivan Turok, 1999. "Urban Labour Markets: The Causes and Consequence of Change," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(5-6), pages 893-915, May.
    15. Donald Houston, 2005. "Employability, Skills Mismatch and Spatial Mismatch in Metropolitan Labour Markets," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(2), pages 221-243, February.
    16. Scott Baum & Anthea Bill & William Mitchell, 2008. "Labour Underutilisation in Metropolitan Labour Markets in Australia: Individual Characteristics, Personal Circumstances and Local Labour Markets," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(5-6), pages 1193-1216, May.
    17. Duncan McVicar & Jan M. Podivinsky, 2009. "How Well Has The New Deal For Young People Worked In The Uk Regions?," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 56(2), pages 167-195, May.
    18. Gillian R Smith, 1999. "Area-based Initiatives: The rationale and options for area targeting," CASE Papers 025, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    19. Anne E. Green & Chris Hasluck, 2009. "Action to Reduce Worklessness: What Works?," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 24(1), pages 28-37, February.
    20. David Etherington & Martin Jones, 2004. "Beyond Contradictions of the Workfare State? Denmark, Welfare-through-Work, and the Promise of Job Rotation," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 22(1), pages 129-148, February.
    21. Christina Beatty & Stephen Fothergill & Rob Macmillan, 2000. "A Theory of Employment, Unemployment and Sickness," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(7), pages 617-630, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:34:y:2000:i:7:p:669-680. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.