IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v17y1999i3p345-372.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New Labourers? Making a New Deal for the ‘Workless Class’

Author

Listed:
  • J Peck

    (School of Geography and International Centre for Labour Studies, Manchester University, Manchester M13 9PL, England)

Abstract

The author presents a critical early appraisal of the British Labour Government's ‘New Deal’ welfare-to-work programme for 18–24 year-olds. A key element in the Government's strategy for tackling social exclusion, the New Deal represents a major financial and political commitment, yet perhaps more fundamentally it reflects a change in Labour's thinking about the underlying causes of, and appropriate remedies for, unemployment. Drawing on a behaviourist, supply-side, explanation of ‘welfare dependency’, the aim of the programme is not to create jobs (as it was for ‘Old Labour’) but to (re)create a work ethic — to raise ‘employ ability ’ amongst young people. This does not take sufficient account of the demand-side, structural, causes of unemployment a fact which is likely to lead to difficulties (both in implementation and in the achievement of positive outcomes) in precisely those parts of the country where the need is greatest: high-unemployment areas in the large cities and lagging regions. The author argues, therefore, that particular attention needs to be paid to the emerging geographies of welfare-to-work because, as the New Deal ‘treads down’ differentially into local labour markets around the country, its effects will begin to diverge from those anticipated by national policymakers. In labour-market terms, the programme may even begin to dispense different regulatory functions in relatively depressed compared with buoyant local economies, with institutional containment emerging as the dominant function in the depressed areas and economic coercion the dominant function in buoyant local economies.

Suggested Citation

  • J Peck, 1999. "New Labourers? Making a New Deal for the ‘Workless Class’," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 17(3), pages 345-372, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:17:y:1999:i:3:p:345-372
    DOI: 10.1068/c170345
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/c170345
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/c170345?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ivan Turok & David Webster, 1998. "The New Deal," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 12(4), pages 309-328, February.
    2. J Peck & M Jones, 1995. "Training and Enterprise Councils: Schumpeterian Workfare State, or What?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 27(9), pages 1361-1396, September.
    3. J A Peck & G F Haughton, 1991. "Youth Training and the Local Reconstruction of Skill: Evidence from the Engineering Industry of North West England, 1981–88," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 23(6), pages 813-832, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Donald Houston, 2005. "Employability, Skills Mismatch and Spatial Mismatch in Metropolitan Labour Markets," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(2), pages 221-243, February.
    2. Christina Hartshorn & Leigh Sear, 2005. "Employability and Enterprise: Evidence from the North East," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(2), pages 271-283, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kevin G Ward, 2000. "State Licence, Local Settlements, and the Politics of ‘Branding’ the City," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 18(3), pages 285-300, June.
    2. Ian Shuttleworth & Anne Green, 2011. "Spatial Mobility Intentions, the Labour Market and Incapacity Benefit Claimants," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(5), pages 911-927, April.
    3. Mark Purcell & J. Christopher Brown, 2005. "Against the local trap: scale and the study of environment and development," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 5(4), pages 279-297, October.
    4. Andrew Beer & Rebecca Bentley & Emma Baker & Kate Mason & Shelley Mallett & Anne Kavanagh & Tony LaMontagne, 2016. "Neoliberalism, economic restructuring and policy change: Precarious housing and precarious employment in Australia," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(8), pages 1542-1558, June.
    5. repec:rri:wpaper:201006 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. McVicar, D. & Podivinsky, J.M., 2007. "Does the impact of active labor market programs depend on the state of the labor market? The case of the UK new deal for young people," Discussion Paper Series In Economics And Econometrics 0704, Economics Division, School of Social Sciences, University of Southampton.
    7. Dr. Edward A. Fieldhouse & Dr. Virinder S. Kalra & Saima Alam, 2002. "How new is the New Deal? A qualitative study of the New Deal for Young People on minority ethnic groups in Oldham," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 17(1), pages 50-64, February.
    8. M R Jones, 1997. "Spatial Selectivity of the State? The Regulationist Enigma and Local Struggles over Economic Governance," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 29(5), pages 831-864, May.
    9. Alasdair Rae, 2012. "Spatial patterns of labour market deprivation in Scotland: Concentration, isolation and persistence," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 27(5-6), pages 593-609, August.
    10. Colin M Mason & Sara Carter & Stephen K Tagg, 2006. "The Effect of the National Minimum Wage on the UK Small Business Sector: A Geographical Analysis," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 24(1), pages 99-116, February.
    11. Duncan McVicar & Jan M. Podivinsky, 2010. "Are Active Labour Market Programmes Least Effective Where They Are Most Needed? The Case of the British New Deal for Young People," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2010n16, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
    12. P E Lloyd, 1999. "The Regional Development Agencies and Social Inclusion: Widening the Agenda," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 17(6), pages 701-713, December.
    13. Andrew Glyn & Stewart Wood, 2000. "New Labour`s Economic Policy," Economics Series Working Papers 49, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    14. Jane Tooke, 2001. "Reforming Adult Education: Struggles over the British State Strategy of Learndirect," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 33(9), pages 1665-1679, September.
    15. R Huggins, 1997. "Training and Enterprise Councils as Facilitators of a Networked Approach to Local Economic Development: Forms, Mechanisms, and Existing Interpretations," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 15(3), pages 273-284, September.
    16. Danny MacKinnon, 2001. "Regulating Regional Spaces: State Agencies and the Production of Governance in the Scottish Highlands," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 33(5), pages 823-844, May.
    17. David Smith, 2000. "Dealed out? Welfare to Work and Social Exclusion," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 15(4), pages 312-324, November.
    18. Giancarlo Corò & Monica Plechero & Francesco Rullani & Mario Volpe, 2020. "The Evolution of Technological Space and Firms' Workforce Composition in a Manufacturing Region," Working Papers 2020:12, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    19. Julie MacLeavy, 2007. "The Six Dimensions of New Labour: Structures, Strategies, and Languages of Neoliberal Legitimacy," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(7), pages 1715-1734, July.
    20. Kenneth Gibb & Liv Osland & Gwilym Pryce, 2014. "Describing Inequalities in Access to Employment and the Associated Geography of Wellbeing," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(3), pages 596-613, February.
    21. Mike Campbell, 2000. "Reconnecting the Long Term Unemployed to Labour Market Opportunity: The Case for a 'Local Active Labour Market Policy'," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(7), pages 655-668, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:17:y:1999:i:3:p:345-372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.