IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v32y1998i1p1-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reflections on China's Open Policy Towards Foreign Direct Investment

Author

Listed:
  • Roger Hayter
  • Sun Sheng Han

Abstract

HAYTER R. and HAN S. S. (1998) Reflections on China's open policy towards foreign direct investment, Reg. Studies 32 , 1-16. China's open policy of kaifang zhengce assumes that foreign direct investment is an essential mechanism by which technological and other forms of know-how regarding best practices can be transferred into the Chinese economy. Yet, this transfer cannot be assumed to the extent that the know-how desired by China simultaneously defines the competitive advantage of multinational corporations. Kaifang zhengce is China's geopolitical strategy to resolve this paradox. Its key features involve combining an explicit spatial strategy within China and reliance on investment by overseas Chinese, especially firms based in Hong Kong. Yet, these firms are not foreign, as conventionally considered, and their contribution to the modernization of China is greater than supposed. HAYTER R. et HAN S. S. (1998) Des reflexions sur la politique d'ouverture de la Chine a l'investissement etranger direct, Reg. Studies 32 , 1-16. La politique d'ouverture de la Chine, autrement dit kaifang zhengce , suppose que l'investissement etranger direct constitue un element cledu mecanisme par lequel le savoir-faire technologique et d'autres formes de savoir-faire relatif aux usages courants s'inserent dans l'economie chinoise. Toujours est-il que cette insertion ne peut pas etre supposee dans la mesure ou le savoir-faire que souhaite la Chine delimite simultanement l'avantage competitif des societes multinationales. Kaifang zhengce est la strategie geopolitique de la Chine qui vise a resoudre ce paradoxe. Ces aspects primordiaux necessitent la combinaison d'une politique d'amenagement du territoire explicite a l'interieur de la Chine et d'une dependance de l'investissement par des Chinois a l'etranger, surtout par les entreprises basees a Hong Kong. Cependant, de telles entreprises ne sont pas etrangeres, dans le sens stricte du terme, et leur contribution a la modernisation de la Chine s'avere beaucoup plus signifiante que l'on n'avait suppose. HAYTER R. und HAN S. S. (1998) Betrachtungen uber Chinas Politik der offenen Tur gegenuber Direktinvestierungen des Auslandes, Reg. Studies 32 , 1-16. Chinas Politik der offenen Tur oder kaifang zhengce nimmt an, dass Direktinvestierung aus dem Ausland ein wesentlicher Mechanismus ist, durch den der chinsischen Industrie technologische und andere Formen des Know-how bezuglich bester Vorgehensweisen einverleibt werden konnen. Doch kann diese Ubertragung nicht in dem Masse erwartet werden, das das von china erstrebte Know-how zugleich auch den Wettbewerbsvorteil multinationaler Korporationen bestimmt. Kaifang zhengce ist Chinas geopolitische Strategie zur Losung dieses Paradoxes. Seine Hauptzuge enthalten die Kombination einer ausgesprochen raumlich bestimmten Strategie innerhalb Chinas und ein Verlassen auf Investierungen von Auslandschinesen, besonders auf in Hong Kong ansassige Firmen. Doch fallen diese Firmen nicht unter die ubliche Definition von Auslandern, und ihr Beitrag zur Modernisierung Chinas ist grosser, als gemeinhin angenommen wird.

Suggested Citation

  • Roger Hayter & Sun Sheng Han, 1998. "Reflections on China's Open Policy Towards Foreign Direct Investment," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 1-16.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:32:y:1998:i:1:p:1-16
    DOI: 10.1080/00343409850123585
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343409850123585
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343409850123585?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Henry Wai-chung Yeung, 1997. "Business Networks and Transnational Corporations: A Study of Hong Kong Firms in the ASEAN Region," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(1), pages 1-25, January.
    2. repec:bla:econom:v:38:y:1971:i:149:p:1-27 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Michael Hobday, 1995. "Innovation In East Asia," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 226.
    4. I Eng & Y Lin, 1996. "Seeking Competitive Advantage in an Emergent Open Economy: Foreign Direct Investment in Chinese Industry," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 28(6), pages 1113-1138, June.
    5. W-C H Yeung, 1994. "Hong Kong Firms in the ASEAN Region: Transnational Corporations and Foreign Direct Investment," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 26(12), pages 1931-1956, December.
    6. John H Dunning, 1980. "Towards an Eclectic Theory of International Production: Some Empirical Tests," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 11(1), pages 9-31, March.
    7. John Brohman, 1996. "Postwar Development in the Asian NICs: Does the Neoliberal Model Fit Reality?," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(2), pages 107-130, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiang Li & Sun Sheng Han & Hao Wu, 2019. "Urban consolidation, power relations, and dilapidated residential redevelopment in Mutoulong, Shenzhen, China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(13), pages 2802-2819, October.
    2. Peixin Li & Lixia Li & Xueliang Zhang, 2019. "Regional Inequality of Firms’ Export Opportunity in China: Geographical Location and Economic Openness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Ingo Liefner & Yehua Dennis Wei & Gang Zeng, 2013. "The Innovativeness and Heterogeneity of Foreign-Invested High-Tech Companies in Shanghai," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(3), pages 522-549, September.
    4. Michael Dunford & Boyang Gao & Weidong Liu, 2021. "Geography and the theory of uneven and combined development: Theorizing uniqueness and the return of China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(5), pages 890-916, August.
    5. McGaughey, Sara L. & Liesch, Peter W. & Poulson, Duncan, 2000. "An unconventional approach to intellectual property protection: the case of an Australian firm transferring shipbuilding technologies to China," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 1-20, April.
    6. Jordán, Gyula, 2000. "A külföldi működőtőke szerepe Kína gazdaságában [The role of foreign direct investment in Chinas economy]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 619-635.
    7. Sun Sheng Han, 2000. "Shanghai between State and Market in Urban Transformation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(11), pages 2091-2112, October.
    8. Sun Sheng Han & Yong Wang, 2003. "The Institutional Structure of a Property Market in Inland China: Chongqing," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(1), pages 91-112, January.
    9. Raju Parakkal, 2019. "Economic Returns from Social and Political Globalization: Does Signaling Help Developing and Transition Countries to Attract Foreign Direct Investment?," ACTA VSFS, University of Finance and Administration, vol. 13(1), pages 8-28.
    10. Maha Mohamed Alsebai Mohamed & Pingfeng Liu & Guihua Nie, 2021. "Are Technological Innovation and Foreign Direct Investment a Way to Boost Economic Growth? An Egyptian Case Study Using the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-28, March.
    11. Hennemann Stefan & Liefner Ingo, 2006. "Kooperations- und Innovationsverhalten von chinesischen Hochtechnologieunternehmen: Empirische Ergebnisse aus Beijing und Shanghai," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 50(1), pages 58-71, October.
    12. Thi Minh Nguyen & A.T.M. Nurul Amin, 2002. "The Role of Foreign Direct Investment in Urban Environmental Management: Some Evidence from Hanoi, Vietnam," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 279-297, September.
    13. Andrzej Cieślik & Jan Jakub Michałek & Krzysztof Szczygielski & Jacek Lewkowicz & Jerzy Mycielski, 2021. "Foreign Ownership and Within-MNEs GVC Participation as Determinants of Innovation Activities: A CIS-Based Firm-Level Analysis," Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, vol. 13(2), pages 189-211, June.
    14. Jaime Santos-Reyes, 2020. "Using Logistic Regression to Identify Leading Factors to Prepare for an Earthquake Emergency during Daytime and Nighttime: The Case of Mass Earthquake Drills," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-25, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul Burkett & Martin Hart-Landsberg, 2000. "Alternative Perspectives on Late Industrialization in East Asia: A Critical Survey," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 32(2), pages 222-264, June.
    2. Li, Jiatao & Kozhikode, Rajiv Krishnan, 2009. "Developing new innovation models: Shifts in the innovation landscapes in emerging economies and implications for global R&D management," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 328-339, September.
    3. Wei ZHAO & Rigas ARVANITIS, 2008. "L’INeGAL DeVELOPPEMENT INDUSTRIEL DE LA CHINE : CAPACITeS D’INNOVATION ET COEXISTENCE DE DIFFeRENTS MODES D’APPRENTISSAGE TECHNOLOGIQUE," Region et Developpement, Region et Developpement, LEAD, Universite du Sud - Toulon Var, vol. 28, pages 61-85.
    4. Dowling, Malcolm & Ray, David, 2000. "The structure and composition of international trade in Asia:: historical trends and future prospects," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 301-318, December.
    5. Markusen, James R. & Venables, Anthony J., 1999. "Foreign direct investment as a catalyst for industrial development," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 335-356, February.
    6. Collinson S. & Narula, R., 2014. "Asset recombination in international partnerships as a source of improved innovation capabilities in China," MERIT Working Papers 2014-061, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    7. Heather Smith, 1999. "The Failure of Korea Inc," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 6(2), pages 153-166.
    8. Bürgel, Oliver & Fier, Andreas & Licht, Georg & Murray, Gordon & Nerlinger, Eric A., 1998. "The internationalisation of British and German start-up companies in high-technology industries," ZEW Discussion Papers 98-34, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    9. Can Huang & Naubahar Sharif, 2016. "Global technology leadership: The case of China," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 43(1), pages 62-73.
    10. Akinbola Amos Olufemi & Alaka Nureni Sanusi & Kowo Solomon Akpoviroro & Adeyemo Adesola Alex, 2020. "Family Business Operations and Sequel of Internationalisation in Nigeria," Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 34(1), pages 126-138, February.
    11. Luis Alfonso Dau & Aya S. Chacar & Marjorie A. Lyles & Jiatao Li, 2022. "Informal institutions and international business: Toward an integrative research agenda," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(6), pages 985-1010, August.
    12. Subramanian Rangan & Metin Sengul, 2009. "Information technology and transnational integration: Theory and evidence on the evolution of the modern multinational enterprise," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 40(9), pages 1496-1514, December.
    13. Francesco Quatraro & Marco Vivarelli, 2015. "Drivers of Entrepreneurship and Post-entry Performance of Newborn Firms in Developing Countries," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 30(2), pages 277-305.
    14. Lurdes Martins & Jorge Cerdeira & Aurora A.C. Teixeira, 2020. "Does corruption boost or harm firms’ performance in developing and emerging economies? A firm‐level study," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(8), pages 2119-2152, August.
    15. Rajah Rasiah & Yap Xiao Shan, 2016. "Institutional support, technological capabilities and domestic linkages in the semiconductor industry in Singapore," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 180-192, January.
    16. Lydia Bals & Jon F. Kirchoff & Kai Foerstl, 2016. "Exploring the reshoring and insourcing decision making process: toward an agenda for future research," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 102-116, December.
    17. Jahan Ara Peerally & John Cantwell, 2011. "The Impact Of Trade Policy Regimes On Firms' Learning For Innovation From Suppliers," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(01), pages 29-68.
    18. Czesława Pilarska, 2018. "Efekty zewnętrzne bezpośrednich inwestycji zagranicznych z perspektywy kraju goszczącego," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 4, pages 93-124.
    19. Pick-Soon Ling & Ming K. Lim & Ming-Lang Tseng, 2020. "Assessing Sustainable Foreign Direct Investment Performance in Malaysia: A Comparison on Policy Makers and Investor Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-38, October.
    20. Rosa Forte, 2004. "The relationship between foreign direct investment and international trade. Substitution or complementarity? A survey," FEP Working Papers 140, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:32:y:1998:i:1:p:1-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.