IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmgr/v7y2005i4p589-613.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The difficulties presented by cost comparison for health care trusts

Author

Listed:
  • Antonio Barretta

Abstract

The aim of this article is to contribute to the debate currently surrounding the question of cost comparison among public health care trusts by presenting an empirical case study of the application of this practice in the Tuscan Health Care Service (THCS). The experience observed in Tuscany will be used to investigate certain aspects of this subject that have been analysed in existing literature. Special attention will be dedicated to the use of cost comparison by health care trusts and the difficulties this practice presents. By adopting a prescriptive approach, on the basis of the outcome of the empirical case study and considerations on benchmarking in public administration presented in existing literature, certain strategies will be recognized as increasing the usefulness of cost comparisons among health care trusts. Adopting these strategies could help to create the conditions in order that data could be considered reliable and used for comparative purposes.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio Barretta, 2005. "The difficulties presented by cost comparison for health care trusts," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(4), pages 589-613, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmgr:v:7:y:2005:i:4:p:589-613
    DOI: 10.1080/14719030500362728
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14719030500362728
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14719030500362728?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Smith, Peter & Mayston, David, 1987. "Measuring efficiency in the public sector," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 181-189.
    2. George Boyne & Steve Martin & Richard Walker, 2004. "Explicit reforms, implicit theories and public service improvement," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 189-210, June.
    3. Giuseppe Marcon & Fabrizio Panozzo, 1998. "Reforming the reform: changing roles for accounting and management in the Italian health care sector," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 185-208.
    4. George Boyne, 2000. "Developments: External Regulation and Best Value in Local Government," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 7-12, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zanakis, Stelios H. & Mandakovic, Tomislav & Gupta, Sushil K. & Sahay, Sundeep & Hong, Sungwan, 1995. "A review of program evaluation and fund allocation methods within the service and government sectors," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 59-79, March.
    2. Les Worrall & Kim Mather & Roger Seifert, 2010. "Solving the Labour Problem Among Professional Workers in the UK Public Sector: Organisation Change and Performance Management," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 117-137, June.
    3. Thomas Bournaris & George Vlontzos & Christina Moulogianni, 2019. "Efficiency of Vegetables Produced in Glasshouses: The Impact of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) in Land Management Decision Making," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, January.
    4. Emmanuel Thanassoulis & Maria Da Conceicao & A. Silva Portela, 2002. "School Outcomes: Sharing the Responsibility Between Pupil and School1," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 183-207.
    5. Richard Barnett & J. Colin Glass & Roger Snowdon & Karl Stringer, 2002. "Size, Performance and Effectiveness: Cost-Constrained Measures of Best-Practice Performance and Secondary-School Size," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 291-311.
    6. Caterina Cavicchi & Chiara Oppi & Emidia Vagnoni, 2019. "On the feasibility of integrated reporting in healthcare: a context analysis starting from a management commentary," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(2), pages 345-371, June.
    7. Richard Austin & Guy Garrod & Nicola Thompson, 2016. "Assessing the performance of the national park authorities: a case study of Northumberland National Park, England," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(5), pages 325-332, July.
    8. Kristof De Witte & Laura López-Torres, 2017. "Efficiency in education: a review of literature and a way forward," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(4), pages 339-363, April.
    9. Mehta, Shekhar & Giertz, J. Fred, 1996. "Measuring the Performance of the Property Tax Assessment Process," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 49(1), pages 73-85, March.
    10. J M Cordero-Ferrera & F Pedraja-Chaparro & D Santín-González, 2010. "Enhancing the inclusion of non-discretionary inputs in DEA," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(4), pages 574-584, April.
    11. Sonal Seth & Qianmei Feng, 2020. "Assessment of port efficiency using stepwise selection and window analysis in data envelopment analysis," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(4), pages 536-561, December.
    12. Moisio, Antti & Aaltonen, Juho & Kirjavainen, Tanja, 2006. "Efficiency and Productivity in Finnish Comprehensive Schooling 1998-2004," Research Reports 127, VATT Institute for Economic Research.
    13. Laura López Torres & Diego Prior, 2014. "Measuring school demand in the presence of spatial dependence. A conditional approach," Investigaciones de Economía de la Educación volume 9, in: Adela García Aracil & Isabel Neira Gómez (ed.), Investigaciones de Economía de la Educación 9, edition 1, volume 9, chapter 4, pages 117-141, Asociación de Economía de la Educación.
    14. Cristina Campanale & Lino Cinquini & Andrea Tenucci, 2014. "Il Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing per la gestione dei costi in logica di spending review: riflessioni da un caso di azienda ospedaliera," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(91), pages 9-42.
    15. López-Torres, Laura & Prior, Diego, 2013. "Do Parents Perceive The Technical Quality Of Public Schools? An Activity Analysis Approach," Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 13(3), pages 39-60.
    16. Chen, Tser-yieth, 1997. "A measurement of the resource utilization efficiency of university libraries," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 71-80, November.
    17. Andrew Worthington, 2001. "An Empirical Survey of Frontier Efficiency Measurement Techniques in Education," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(3), pages 245-268.
    18. J S Liu & W-M Lu & C Yang & M Chuang, 2009. "A network-based approach for increasing discrimination in data envelopment analysis," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(11), pages 1502-1510, November.
    19. Caballero, Rafael & Galache, Teodoro & Gomez, Trinidad & Molina, Julian & Torrico, Angel, 2004. "Budgetary allocations and efficiency in the human resources policy of a university following multiple criteria," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 67-74, February.
    20. Congcong Yang & Alfred Taudes & Guozhi Dong, 2017. "Efficiency analysis of European Freight Villages: three peers for benchmarking," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 25(1), pages 91-122, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pubmgr:v:7:y:2005:i:4:p:589-613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPXM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.