IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jocebs/v15y2017i3p215-228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacts of trade liberalization with China and Chinese FDI on Laos: evidence from the CGE model

Author

Listed:
  • Phouphet Kyophilavong
  • Michael C. S. Wong
  • Somchith Souksavath
  • Bin Xiong

Abstract

The Lao-Chinese railway will be completed by 2020. It is a strategic route of China’s One-Belt-One-Road policy to reach out to South-East Asia, linking Kunming and Vientiane. Surrounded by Thailand, Myanmar, Cambodia, Vietnam, and China; Laos is small economy with a population of 6.90 million in 2014. It has been one of least developed economies in the world for several decades. With increased trade liberalization and FDI, Laos has robust GDP growth in the past two decades. In particular, the amount of FDI in Laos quickly jumps by more than 100% in 2014, because of massive increases in Chinese FDI. This paper summarizes major policies in Laos on trade liberalization and FDI and applies Computable General Equilibrium model to estimate how trade liberalization with China and Chinese FDI would affect Laos in terms of economic performance, outputs on various sectors, and poverty reduction. Our results show the following interesting findings: (a) both have positive impacts on overall economic performance; (b) some sectors in Laos have their outputs declined by trade liberalization with China; (c) both have positive impacts on reducing poverty in Laos but Chinese FDI is more able to narrow income gap in the country.

Suggested Citation

  • Phouphet Kyophilavong & Michael C. S. Wong & Somchith Souksavath & Bin Xiong, 2017. "Impacts of trade liberalization with China and Chinese FDI on Laos: evidence from the CGE model," Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 215-228, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jocebs:v:15:y:2017:i:3:p:215-228
    DOI: 10.1080/14765284.2017.1346923
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14765284.2017.1346923
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14765284.2017.1346923?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hertel, Thomas, 1997. "Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and applications," GTAP Books, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, number 7685, December.
    2. Hanslow, Kevin, 2000. "A General Welfare Decomposition For Cge Models," Technical Papers 28724, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    3. Xiao-guang Zhang, 2006. "Armington Elasticities and Terms of Trade Effects in Global CGE Models," Staff Working Papers 0601, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia.
    4. Erwin L. Corong, 2008. "Tariff Reduction, Carbon Emissions and Poverty: An Economy-Wide Assessment for the Philippines," EEPSEA Research Report rr2008012, Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEPSEA), revised Jan 2008.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andini Nurwulandari & I Made Adnyana & Hasanudin, 2019. "Did Inter-Regional Trade Agreements Bring Mutual Benefits? An Empirical Scheme of Indonesian Commodity Exports in Asean-China Free Trade Area," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(6), pages 241-249, October.
    2. Hui Wang & Xin Zhong, 2023. "An Empirical Study on the Impact of Chinese OFDI on the Global Value Chain Positions of Countries Along the Belt and Road and Threshold Effects," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, February.
    3. Alves, Ana Cristina & Gong, Xue & Li, Mingjiang, 2023. "The BRI: A new development cooperation paradigm in the making? Unpacking China’s infrastructure cooperation along the Maritime Silk Road," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    4. Mingchun Cao & Ilan Alon, 2020. "Intellectual Structure of the Belt and Road Initiative Research: A Scientometric Analysis and Suggestions for a Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-40, August.
    5. Jiyong Chen & Dabo Chen & Aiping Yao, 2020. "Trade development between China and countries along the Belt and Road: A spatial econometric analysis based on trade competitiveness and complementarity," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 205-227, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Theodoros N. Chatzivasileiadis & Marjan W. Hofkes & Onno J. Kuik & Richard S.J. Tol, 2016. "Full economic impacts of sea level rise: loss of productive resources and transport disruptions," Working Paper Series 09916, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    2. Berrittella Maria & Cimino Filippo Alessandro, 2017. "An Assessment of Carousel Value-Added Tax Fraud in The European Carbon Market," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Dissanayake, Sumali & Mahadevan, Renuka & Asafu-Adjaye, John, 2019. "Is there a role for trade liberalization in mitigating the impacts of climate change on agriculture?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 307-324.
    4. Scott McDonald & Terrie Walmsley, 2004. "Preferential Trade Agreements and the Optimal Liberalisation of Agricultural Trade," Working Papers 2004010, The University of Sheffield, Department of Economics, revised Aug 2004.
    5. Romain Perez & Mustapha Sadni Jallab, 2009. "Preference erosion and market access liberalization: the African dilemma in multilateral negotiations on agriculture," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 145(2), pages 277-292, July.
    6. Ditya A Nurdianto & Budy P Resosudarmo, 2014. "ASEAN Economic community and climate change," Departmental Working Papers 2014-24, The Australian National University, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics.
    7. Theodoros N. Chatzivasileiadis & Marjan W. Hofkes & Onno J. Kuik & Richard S.J. Tol, 2016. "Full economic impacts of sea level rise: loss of productive resources and transport disruptions," Working Paper Series 9916, Department of Economics, University of Sussex.
    8. Ricardo Arguello, 2004. "An exporatory assessment of the potential impact of the free trade area of the americas on the andean community," Borradores de Investigación 4332, Universidad del Rosario.
    9. Ernesto Valenzuela & Kym Anderson & Thomas Hertel, 2008. "Impacts of trade reform: sensitivity of model results to key assumptions," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 395-420, February.
    10. Evans, David & Gasiorek, Michael & McDonald, Scott & Robinson, Sherman, 2006. "Trade Liberalisation with Trade Induced Technical Change in Morocco and Egypt: Findings and Wider Research Implications," Conference papers 331529, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    11. Peter Lloyd & Xiao-guang Zhang, 2006. "The Armington Model," Staff Working Papers 0602, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia.
    12. Francois, Joseph F. & Spinanger, Dean, 2003. "From 0 to 60 without a Hitch? Regulated Efficiency, WTO Accession, and the Motor Vehicle Sector in China," Conference papers 331150, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    13. Domingues, Edson P. & Haddad, Eduardo A. & Hewings, Geoffrey, 2008. "Sensitivity analysis in applied general equilibrium models: An empirical assessment for MERCOSUR free trade areas agreements," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 287-306, May.
    14. McDougall, Robert, 2002. "A New Regional Household Demand System For Gtap," Technical Papers 28713, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    15. Raihan, Selim & Khondker, Bazlul Haque, 2010. "Doha Round Impacts on India: A Study in a Sequential Dynamic CGE Framework," Conference papers 331969, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    16. Simon J.Evenett & Mia Mikic & Ravi Ratnayake (ed.), 2011. "Trade-led growth: A sound strategy for Asia," ARTNeT Books and Research Reports, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), number brr10.
    17. Henseler, Martin & Piot-Lepetit, Isabelle & Ferrari, Emanuele & Mellado, Aida Gonzalez & Banse, Martin & Grethe, Harald & Parisi, Claudia & Hélaine, Sophie, 2013. "On the asynchronous approvals of GM crops: Potential market impacts of a trade disruption of EU soy imports," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 166-176.
    18. Pavel Ciaian & d'Artis Kancs & Jan Pokrivcak, 2008. "Comparative Advantages, Transaction Costs and Factor Content of Agricultural Trade: Empirical Evidence from the CEE," EERI Research Paper Series EERI_RP_2008_03, Economics and Econometrics Research Institute (EERI), Brussels.
    19. Federico Perali & Stefania Lovo, 2009. "Counterfactual analysis using a regional dynamic general equilibrium model with historical calibration," Working Papers 58/2009, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    20. Dixon, Peter & Rimmer, Maureen, 2021. "A GTAP Historical Simulation from 2004 to 2014," Conference papers 333258, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jocebs:v:15:y:2017:i:3:p:215-228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCEA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.