IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/331529.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Trade Liberalisation with Trade Induced Technical Change in Morocco and Egypt: Findings and Wider Research Implications

Author

Listed:
  • Evans, David
  • Gasiorek, Michael
  • McDonald, Scott
  • Robinson, Sherman

Abstract

Since the Barcelona Declaration of 1995, the EU and the countries of the Southern Mediterranean, referred to here as the Mediterranean and North African or MENA countries, have been engaged in a more active process of integration and trade liberalisation. Whereas prior to 1995 the relationship was primarily asymmetric, the Barcelona process envisaged trade relations becoming both more symmetric as well as deeper than heretofore. The context of these developments in the MENA countries is an explosion in the number of regional trade agreements in recent years. An analysis of such agreements and historical analysis of patterns of trade and formation of trade blocs in the post-war period suggests that RTAs can be categorised into three types: (1) bloc creation, (2) bloc expansion, (3) market access. (see Evans et al 2006). In assessing any regional trade agreement it is important to consider the impact of policies and trends affecting both “shallow” and “deep” integration. “Shallow” integration involves the lowering or elimination of barriers to the movement of goods and services across national borders within the region. Within this context “negative” integration entails the lowering trade barriers created by national policies. “Deep” integration: Involves establishing or expanding the institutional environment in order to facilitate trade and location of production without regard to national borders. In this context “positive” integration suggests policies designed to encourage trade and facilitate segmentation of production processes and value chains. An important component of such deep integration is Smithian trade induced technical change based on local scale economies and externalities. This paper considers closer economic relations between Morocco and the EU, and Egypt and the EU. These agreements are primarily market access agreements but with some elements of deep integration. The primary methodology used is a regional Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model referred to as the MENA CGE model, a methodology well suited to the analysis of shallow integration. In addition, two elements of deep integration included. First, preliminary econometric estimates of trade induced technical change are included in the MENA CGE model, based on (Gasiorek et al 2005 and 2006. The preliminary econometric results suggest a positive relationship between trade shares in output and total factor productivity change at the firm level. Second, some experiments designed to capture possible orders of magnitude of welfare gains from incorporating a degree of regulatory harmonisation product standards or process standards that may generate production externalities such as Smithian gains. The trade induced productivity linkages were included in the MENA CGE model, based on (McDonald et al., 2005). This facilitated estimates of the impact of changes in tariffs and trade-induced technical change on from FTA’s with the EU. In the case of Morocco, a direct estimate of poverty impacts was also made. The second element of deep integration from regulatory harmonisation considered was from notional increases in export supply elasticities for Egypt and Morocco, and for import demand elasticities for the EU. Thus, the MENA CGE model experiments were designed to assess: • the economy-wide impact of shallow integration in Morocco, Egypt and the EU on economic welfare assuming only the reduction of tariff barriers in a FTA with the European Union. Note that the FTAs considered are asymmetrical because EU tariffs on manufactured imports from Morocco and Egypt have already been eliminated whilst Morocco and Egyptian protection against EU exports of manufactures that is eliminated in the FTAs is high. • the economy-wide impact of trade policy reform together with deep integration in the form of trade-induced productivity changes using response elasticities based on the preliminary econometric findings reported in (Gasiorek et al 2005 and 2006). • the economy wide impact of a broader trade policy reform with additional deep integration defined as a degree of harmonisation of standards inducing increased export supply elasticities in Egypt and Morocco and import demand elasticities in the EU.• With respect to these policy experiments, we report on the impact of the simulations on aggregate performance (trade, GDP, absorption), on factor markets, and for Morocco, on poverty. Most experiments reported have a fixed wage for unemployed labour allowing for changes in unemployment of unskilled labour, , roughly reflecting high recorded base year levels of unemployment in both MENA economies. • In our preliminary experiments, there was evidence of some trade diversion in Morocco, and strong trade diversion in Egypt, at base levels of MFN tariffs. Egypt has begun a process of reform of MFN tariffs and some additional experiments were conducted to estimate the impact of such MFN tariff reforms on economic welfare and trade diversion.

Suggested Citation

  • Evans, David & Gasiorek, Michael & McDonald, Scott & Robinson, Sherman, 2006. "Trade Liberalisation with Trade Induced Technical Change in Morocco and Egypt: Findings and Wider Research Implications," Conference papers 331529, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331529
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/331529/files/2605.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. W. Jill Harrison & J. Mark Horridge & K.R. Pearson, 2000. "Decomposing Simulation Results with Respect to Exogenous Shocks," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 15(3), pages 227-249, June.
    2. Xiao-guang Zhang, 2006. "Armington Elasticities and Terms of Trade Effects in Global CGE Models," Staff Working Papers 0601, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia.
    3. Frank Ackerman, "undated". "The Shrinking Gains from Trade: A Critical Assessment of Doha Round Projections," GDAE Working Papers 05-01, GDAE, Tufts University.
    4. Antoine Bouët & Yvan Decreux & Lionel Fontagné & Sébastien Jean & David Laborde, 2004. "A Consistent, Ad-Valorem Equivalent Measure of Applied Protection Across the World: The MAcMap-HS6 Database," Working Papers 2004-22, CEPII research center.
    5. World Bank, 2003. "Global Economic Prospects and the Developing Countries 2003 : Investing to Unlock Global Opportunities," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 14781.
    6. Malcolm, Gerard, 1998. "Adjusting Tax Rates in the GTAP Data Base," GTAP Technical Papers 315, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University.
    7. Peter Lloyd & Xiao-guang Zhang, 2006. "The Armington Model," Staff Working Papers 0602, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia.
    8. Malcolm, Gerard, 1998. "Adjusting Tax Rates In The Gtap Data Base," Technical Papers 28721, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    9. Hertel, Thomas, 1997. "Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and applications," GTAP Books, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, number 7685, December.
    10. McKibbin, W.J. & Wilcoxen, J.P., 1992. "G-Cubec: A Dynamic Multi-Sector General Equilibrium Model of the Global economy (Quantifying the Cost of Curbing CO2 Emissions)," Papers 98, Brookings Institution - Working Papers.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hans G. Jensen & Kym Anderson, 2017. "Grain Price Spikes and Beggar-thy-Neighbor Policy Responses: A Global Economywide Analysis," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 31(1), pages 158-175.
    2. Keeney, Roman & Beckman, Jayson, 2009. "WTO negotiations on agriculture and the distributional impacts for US rice farm households," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 70-80, February.
    3. 武田 史郎, 2007. "貿易政策を対象とした応用一般均衡分析," Discussion Papers (Japanese) 07010, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    4. Ianchovichina, Elena, 2004. "Trade policy analysis in the presence of duty drawbacks," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 353-371, April.
    5. Ianchovichina, Elena, 2003. "GTAP-DD: A Model for Analyzing Trade Reforms in the Presence of Duty Drawbacks," GTAP Technical Papers 1192, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University.
    6. Ole Boysen & Kirsten Boysen-Urban & Alan Matthews, 2021. "Alternative EU CAP Tools for Stabilising Farm Incomes in the Era of Climate Change," Working Papers 202103, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    7. Laborde, David & Martin, Will & van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique, 2008. "Implications of the 2008 Doha Draft Agricultural and NAMA Market Access Modalities for Developing Countries," Conference papers 331719, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    8. Balie, Jean & Strutt, Anna & Nelgen, Signe & Narayanan, 2018. "Infrastructure investments for improved market access in subSaharan Africa: A CGE analysis," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 13(2), June.
    9. De Miguel, Carlos J. & Durán Lima, José Elías & Schuschny, Andrés Ricardo, 2007. "Los acuerdos comerciales de Colombia, Ecuador y Perú con los Estados Unidos: efectos sobre el comercio, la producción y el bienestar," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), April.
    10. Hertel, Thomas & Hummels, David & Ivanic, Maros & Keeney, Roman, 2007. "How confident can we be of CGE-based assessments of Free Trade Agreements?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 611-635, July.
    11. Ernesto Valenzuela & Kym Anderson & Thomas Hertel, 2008. "Impacts of trade reform: sensitivity of model results to key assumptions," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 395-420, February.
    12. Horridge, Mark & Ferreira-Filho, Joaquim Bento de Souza, 2003. "Linking GTAP to National Models: Some Highlights and a Practical Approach," Conference papers 331115, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    13. Peter Walkenhorst & Tadashi Yasui, 2004. "Quantitative Assessment of the Benefits of Trade Facilitation," International Trade 0401008, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Soo Yuen Chong & Jung Hur, 2007. "Overlapping Free Trade Agreements of Singapore-USA-Japan : A Computational Analysis," Trade Working Papers 21931, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    15. Gehlhar, Mark & Wainio, John, 2004. "Feasibility of Reducing Agricultural Protection: Implications for Farm Households," Conference papers 331293, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    16. Terrie Walmsley & Peter Minor, 2020. "US Trade Actions Against China: A Supply Chain Perspective," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 55(3), pages 337-371, August.
    17. Hübler, Michael, 2010. "Can Carbon Based Tariffs Effectively Reduce Emissions? A Numerical Analysis with Focus on China," Conference papers 331921, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    18. Wusheng Yu & Hans G. Jensen, 2010. "China’s Agricultural Policy Transition: Impacts of Recent Reforms and Future Scenarios," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 343-368, June.
    19. Anderson, Kym & Valenzuela, Ernesto & van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique, 2009. "Welfare and Poverty Effects of Global Agricultural and Trade Policies Using the Linkage Model," Agricultural Distortions Working Paper Series 52785, World Bank.
    20. Scott McDonald & Terrie Walmsley, 2008. "Bilateral Free Trade Agreements and Customs Unions: The Impact of the EU Republic of South Africa Free Trade Agreement on Botswana," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(8), pages 993-1029, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331529. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.