IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v24y2006i2p149-158.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Private housing design customization through house type substitution

Author

Listed:
  • Chris Leishman
  • Fran Warren

Abstract

The private house building industry is increasingly under pressure to increase output and broaden the appeal of new-build housing to consumers. One possible method for meeting these objectives is through increased use of standardized components to facilitate house type customization. This research focuses on the role of planning and building regulations in permitting the house building industry to respond in this way. Using a database of standardized house types, the analysis examines variation within and between house builders' house type ranges. The analysis shows that the underlying variation between house types of a given size is relatively narrow but that volume builders maintain a comparatively large range of house types. Results from a simulation model demonstrate the positive impact of broadening house type choice on levels of consumer satisfaction. The main conclusion is that a form of house type customization could be achieved through the use of house type substitution.

Suggested Citation

  • Chris Leishman & Fran Warren, 2006. "Private housing design customization through house type substitution," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 149-158.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:24:y:2006:i:2:p:149-158
    DOI: 10.1080/01446190500204754
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01446190500204754
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01446190500204754?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohamed Naim & James Barlow, 2003. "An innovative supply chain strategy for customized housing," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(6), pages 593-602.
    2. Alan Hooper & Chris Nicol, 2000. "Design practice and volume production in speculative housebuilding," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 295-310.
    3. R. Roy & S. P. Cochrane, 1999. "Development of a customer focused strategy in speculative house building," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(6), pages 777-787.
    4. Rajat Roy & Justine Brown & Chris Gaze, 2003. "Re-engineering the construction process in the speculative house-building sector," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 137-146.
    5. Alistair Gibb, 2001. "Standardization and pre-assembly- distinguishing myth from reality using case study research," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 307-315.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schoenwitz, Manuel & Potter, Andrew & Gosling, Jonathan & Naim, Mohamed, 2017. "Product, process and customer preference alignment in prefabricated house building," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PA), pages 79-90.
    2. Colin Jones & Chris Leishman & Charlotte MacDonald, 2009. "Sustainable Urban Form and Residential Development Viability," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(7), pages 1667-1690, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schoenwitz, Manuel & Potter, Andrew & Gosling, Jonathan & Naim, Mohamed, 2017. "Product, process and customer preference alignment in prefabricated house building," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PA), pages 79-90.
    2. Naim, Mohamed M. & Gosling, Jonathan, 2011. "On leanness, agility and leagile supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 342-354, May.
    3. Seoyoung Jung & Seulki Lee & Jungho Yu, 2021. "Identification and Prioritization of Critical Success Factors for Off-Site Construction Using ISM and MICMAC Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Hosang Hyun & Young-Min Lee & Hyung-Geun Kim & Jin-Sung Kim, 2021. "Framework for Long-Term Public Housing Supply Plan Focusing on Small-Scale Offsite Construction in Seoul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, May.
    5. Bossink, B.A.G., 2002. "The development of co-innovation strategies: stages and interaction patterns in interfirm innovation," Serie Research Memoranda 0020, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    6. Rajat Roy & Margaret Low & John Waller, 2005. "Documentation, standardization and improvement of the construction process in house building," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 57-67.
    7. Johan Larsson & Per Erik Eriksson & Thomas Olofsson & Peter Simonsson, 2014. "Industrialized construction in the Swedish infrastructure sector: core elements and barriers," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1-2), pages 83-96, February.
    8. Gosling, Jonathan & Naim, Mohamed M., 2009. "Engineer-to-order supply chain management: A literature review and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 741-754, December.
    9. Jozef Švajlenka & Mária Kozlovská, 2018. "Perception of User Criteria in the Context of Sustainability of Modern Methods of Construction Based on Wood," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-17, January.
    10. Bergstrom, Max & Stehn, Lars, 2005. "Matching industrialised timber frame housing needs and enterprise resource planning: A change process," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 172-184, August.
    11. Pero, Margherita & Stößlein, Martin & Cigolini, Roberto, 2015. "Linking product modularity to supply chain integration in the construction and shipbuilding industries," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PB), pages 602-615.
    12. Susan Bogus & Keith Molenaar & James Diekmann, 2006. "Strategies for overlapping dependent design activities," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(8), pages 829-837.
    13. Nick Blismas & Christine Pasquire & Alistair Gibb, 2006. "Benefit evaluation for off-site production in construction," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 121-130.
    14. Kangning Liu & Yikun Su & Shoujian Zhang, 2018. "Evaluating Supplier Management Maturity in Prefabricated Construction Project-Survey Analysis in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, August.
    15. Linda Tay & Neil Morgan, 2002. "Antecedents and consequences of market orientation in chartered surveying firms," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 331-341.
    16. Pablo Jimenez-Moreno, 2021. "Mass Customisation for Zero-Energy Housing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, May.
    17. Koki Arai & Emi Morimoto, 2019. "The Construction Industry and (Dis)Economies of Scope: Empirical Research in the Hokkaido Procurement Auction," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 281-292, June.
    18. Louise Bildsten, 2014. "Buyer-supplier relationships in industrialized building," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1-2), pages 146-159, February.
    19. Lei Jiang & Zhongfu Li & Long Li & Tiankun Li & Yunli Gao, 2018. "A Framework of Industrialized Building Assessment in China Based on the Structural Equation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, August.
    20. Jeong-hoon Lee & Jin-sung Kim & Hak-ju Lee & Young-Min Lee & Hyung-Geun Kim, 2019. "Small-Scale Public Rental Housing Development Using Modular Construction—Lessons learned from Case Studies in Seoul, Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:24:y:2006:i:2:p:149-158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.