IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v23y2005i1p57-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Documentation, standardization and improvement of the construction process in house building

Author

Listed:
  • Rajat Roy
  • Margaret Low
  • John Waller

Abstract

There is growing interest in the industrialization of house building methods in the UK. Much of the focus has been on the use of manufactured structural components, which addresses the inherent problems of reliance on 'wet trades' but not of the quality and efficiency of the assembly and 'fitting' processes on site. The house building process has tended to develop more through custom and practice rather than formal analysis of methods. There is a lack of standards, and of mechanisms for process review or sharing knowledge and good practice. The result is significant process variability on site. Process documentation is a rigorous description of a process, procedure or policy to facilitate training, and development of consistency of operations and standards. The paper presents work on a process documentation system, and discusses the organizational changes needed to create the cultural environment for process standardization and improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Rajat Roy & Margaret Low & John Waller, 2005. "Documentation, standardization and improvement of the construction process in house building," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 57-67.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:23:y:2005:i:1:p:57-67
    DOI: 10.1080/0144619042000287787
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0144619042000287787
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144619042000287787?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Gann & Peter Senker, 1998. "Construction skills training for the next millennium," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(5), pages 569-580.
    2. Rajat Roy & Justine Brown & Chris Gaze, 2003. "Re-engineering the construction process in the speculative house-building sector," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 137-146.
    3. S. MacKenzie & A. R. Kilpatrick & A. Akintoye, 2000. "UK construction skills shortage response strategies and an analysis of industry perceptions," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(7), pages 853-862.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Love, Peter E.D. & Ika, Lavagnon A. & Matthews, Jane & Li, Xinjian & Fang, Weili, 2021. "A procurement policy-making pathway to future-proof large-scale transport infrastructure assets," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    2. Wuttipong Kusonkhum & Korb Srinavin & Tanayut Chaitongrat, 2023. "The Adoption of a Big Data Approach Using Machine Learning to Predict Bidding Behavior in Procurement Management for a Construction Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Gustav Jansson & Helena Johnsson & Dan Engstr�m, 2014. "Platform use in systems building," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1-2), pages 70-82, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Honorata Howaniec & Łukasz Krzysztof Wróblewski & Hana Štverková, 2021. "Competency Gaps of Employees in the Construction Sector in Terms of the Requirements of a Low-Carbon Economy. Polish and Czech Case," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Andrew Dainty & Stephen Ison & Geoffrey Briscoe, 2005. "The construction labour market skills crisis: the perspective of small-medium-sized firms," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 387-398.
    3. Ceric Anita & Ivic Ivona, 2020. "Construction labor and skill shortages in Croatia: causes and response strategies," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 2232-2244, January.
    4. Amos C. Mpofu & Favourate Y. Mpofu & Fennie Mantula & Sipo Ndlovu, 2024. "The Essentials or Fundamentals for Harnessing Technologies to Improve Teaching and Learning through Online Learning as Part of Digital Transformation in Higher Education," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(1), pages 2488-2502, January.
    5. Akomah Benjamin Boahene & Ahinaquah Laud Kwamina & Mustapha Zakari, 2020. "Skilled Labour Shortage in the Building Construction Industry Within the Central Region," Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 83-92, January.
    6. Andrew R. J. Dainty & Stephen G. Ison & David S. Root, 2005. "Averting the Construction Skills Crisis: A Regional Approach," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 20(1), pages 79-89, February.
    7. Lei Jiang & Zhongfu Li & Long Li & Tiankun Li & Yunli Gao, 2018. "A Framework of Industrialized Building Assessment in China Based on the Structural Equation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, August.
    8. M. Muya & A. D. F. Price & F. T. Edum-Fotwe, 2006. "Overview of funding for construction craft skills training in Sub-Saharan Africa: a case study of Zambia," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 197-208.
    9. Chris Leishman & Fran Warren, 2006. "Private housing design customization through house type substitution," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 149-158.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:23:y:2005:i:1:p:57-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.