IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v32y2014i1-2p146-159.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Buyer-supplier relationships in industrialized building

Author

Listed:
  • Louise Bildsten

Abstract

Close collaboration is considered important; but is close collaboration for all purchases necessary to create value-in-production ? In construction as well as in other industries, companies purchase a variety of items that require different amounts of attention to the relationship with suppliers. Buyer-supplier relationships are investigated in relation to how they bring value-in-production in the industrialized building sector. An adaptation of the Kraljic model is applied to the context of industrialized housebuilding in Sweden. Different relationships and different purchased items are classified with the aim of revealing patterns that may prove useful when determining purchasing strategies intended to create value-in-production. Purchasing strategies were studied through data collection at four industrialized housebuilders. Analysis of these strategies suggests that the total product offer from suppliers in terms of customization, logistics and standardization plays an important role in the choice of suppliers in order to satisfy the requirement for efficient production. Long-term relationships enable the development of a specific way of working that adds value-in-production. A new purchasing portfolio model for determining the effectiveness of purchasing strategies on the production process is thus presented, where products are classified according to value-in-production.

Suggested Citation

  • Louise Bildsten, 2014. "Buyer-supplier relationships in industrialized building," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1-2), pages 146-159, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:32:y:2014:i:1-2:p:146-159
    DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2013.812228
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01446193.2013.812228
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01446193.2013.812228?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roine Leiringer & Stuart Green & Jawwad Raja, 2009. "Living up to the value agenda: the empirical realities of through-life value creation in construction," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 271-285.
    2. Mayer, Kyle J. & Teece, David J., 2008. "Unpacking strategic alliances: The structure and purpose of alliance versus supplier relationships," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 106-127, April.
    3. Roine Leiringer, 2006. "Technological innovation in PPPs: incentives, opportunities and actions," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 301-308.
    4. Mirjam I. Kibbeling & Cees J. Gelderman & Jan M. Ulijn & Arjan J. Van Weele & Richard Calvi, 2009. "A Dutch-French comparison of dependence, trust and commitment in buyer-supplier relationships: a purchasing portfolio approach," International Journal of Business and Globalisation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(4), pages 353-373.
    5. James Robert Mason, 2007. "The views and experiences of specialist contractors on partnering in the UK," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(5), pages 519-527.
    6. David J. Teece, 2007. "Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(13), pages 1319-1350, December.
    7. Anna Dubois & Lars-Erik Gadde, 2002. "The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: implications for productivity and innovation," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(7), pages 621-631.
    8. Anne Parmigiani, 2007. "Why do firms both make and buy? An investigation of concurrent sourcing," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 285-311, March.
    9. David Greenwood & Shuwei Wu, 2012. "Establishing the association between collaborative working and construction project performance based on client and contractor perceptions," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 299-308, February.
    10. Chris Goodier & Alistair Gibb, 2007. "Future opportunities for offsite in the UK," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(6), pages 585-595.
    11. Alistair Gibb, 2001. "Standardization and pre-assembly- distinguishing myth from reality using case study research," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 307-315.
    12. Nagarur, Nagen & Azeem, Abdullahil, 1999. "Impact of commonality and flexibility on manufacturing performance: A simulation study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 125-134, April.
    13. Wu Min & Low Sui Pheng, 2005. "Economic order quantity (EOQ) versus just-in-time (JIT) purchasing: an alternative analysis in the ready-mixed concrete industry," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 409-422.
    14. R. Calvi & M. Kibbeling & J. Ulijn & A. van Weele, 2009. "A Dutch-French comparison of dependence, trust and commitment in buyer supplier relationships: A purchasing portfolio approach," Post-Print halshs-00520885, HAL.
    15. Wolfgang Ulaga & Andreas Eggert, 2006. "Value-Based Differentiation in Business Relationships: Gaining and Sustaining Key Supplier Status," Post-Print hal-00482456, HAL.
    16. Dubois, Anna & Gadde, Lars-Erik, 2002. "Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(7), pages 553-560, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Louise Bildsten, 2021. "A project-based purchasing portfolio matrix applied to the Australian construction industry," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(10), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Nurhayati, Kartika & Tavasszy, Lóránt & Rezaei, Jafar, 2023. "Joint B2B supply chain decision-making: Drivers, facilitators and barriers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    3. Chu Sheng Ding & Tiong Koh Chieng & Chih Siong Wong & Shi Yee Wong & Prescilla Anak Palis, 2024. "Factors Affecting Buyer-Supplier Relationship in Sarawak, Malaysia from the Construction Contractor’s Perspective: A PLS-SEM Approach," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(8), pages 450-463, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kindström, Daniel & Kowalkowski, Christian & Sandberg, Erik, 2013. "Enabling service innovation: A dynamic capabilities approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(8), pages 1063-1073.
    2. Raja, Jawwad Z. & Frandsen, Thomas & Mouritsen, Jan, 2017. "Exploring the managerial dilemmas encountered by advanced analytical equipment providers in developing service-led growth strategies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 120-132.
    3. Nurhayati, Kartika & Tavasszy, Lóránt & Rezaei, Jafar, 2023. "Joint B2B supply chain decision-making: Drivers, facilitators and barriers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    4. Kazadi, Kande & Lievens, Annouk & Mahr, Dominik, 2016. "Stakeholder co-creation during the innovation process: Identifying capabilities for knowledge creation among multiple stakeholders," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 525-540.
    5. Kashan, Alireza Javanmardi & Lay, Janine & Wiewiora, Anna & Bradley, Lisa, 2022. "The innovation process in mining: Integrating insights from innovation and change management," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    6. Kesidou, Sofia & Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2019. "Supply chain integration for low-carbon buildings: A critical interdisciplinary review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Pattanayak, Sirsha & Ramkumar, M. & Goswami, Mohit & Rana, Nripendra P., 2024. "Blockchain technology and supply chain performance: The role of trust and relational capabilities," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    8. Schriber, Svante & Löwstedt, Jan, 2015. "Tangible resources and the development of organizational capabilities," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 54-68.
    9. Sufyan, Muhammad & Degbey, William Y. & Glavee-Geo, Richard & Zoogah, Baniyelme D., 2023. "Transnational digital entrepreneurship and enterprise effectiveness: A micro-foundational perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    10. Louise Bildsten, 2021. "A project-based purchasing portfolio matrix applied to the Australian construction industry," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(10), pages 1-18, October.
    11. Daniela Corsaro, 2017. "Disclosing the dark side of value processes in business relationships," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(4), pages 125-149.
    12. Randhawa, Krithika & Wilden, Ralf & Gudergan, Siegfried, 2021. "How to innovate toward an ambidextrous business model? The role of dynamic capabilities and market orientation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 618-634.
    13. Seyedesmaeil Mousavi & Bart Bossink & Mario van Vliet, 2019. "Microfoundations of companies' dynamic capabilities for environmentally sustainable innovation: Case study insights from high‐tech innovation in science‐based companies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 366-387, February.
    14. Aslam, Muhammad Shakeel & O’Reilly, Dermot & Shah, Uzair, 2023. "Taking the rough with the smooth: A qualitative inquiry into social and cultural practices of knowledge-sharing work in international consultancy alliances," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(4).
    15. Liliya Oxtorp, 2014. "Dynamic managerial capability of technology-based international new ventures—a basis for their long-term competitive advantage," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 389-420, December.
    16. Altintas, Gulsun & Ambrosini, Véronique & Gudergan, Siegfried, 2022. "MNE dynamic capabilities in (un)related diversification," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(1).
    17. Tomas Santa‐Maria & Walter J. V. Vermeulen & Rupert J. Baumgartner, 2022. "How do incumbent firms innovate their business models for the circular economy? Identifying micro‐foundations of dynamic capabilities," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1308-1333, May.
    18. Zerbini, Fabrizio & Borghini, Stefania, 2015. "Release capacity in the vendor selection process," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 405-414.
    19. Fred Strønen & Thomas Hoholm & Kari Kværner & Linn Nathalie Støme, 2017. "Dynamic capabilities and innovation capabilities: The case of the ‘Innovation Clinic’," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 13(1), pages 89-116.
    20. Schriber, Svante & Löwstedt, Jan, 2018. "Managing asset orchestration: A processual approach to adapting to dynamic environments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 307-317.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:32:y:2014:i:1-2:p:146-159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.