IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v23y2005i1p45-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determining the relationship between fee structure and project performance between firms: an empirical study based on institutional and task environment perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Florence Phua

Abstract

Construction firms, under the influence of different dynamic institutional and task environment forces, are likely to have differing perceptions about the determinants of project performance. To test this proposition, this study uses institutional and task environment frameworks to investigate specifically the relationship between fee structure and project performance across different construction firms. Despite anecdotal evidence suggesting that such a relationship exists, empirical results based on data collected from 398 construction firms in Hong Kong did not support this assertion. However, by further modelling the differences across firms, the results indicate that firms on the whole regard other task environment factors as more important to project performance compared to institutional factors. Based on follow-up interviews, suggestions as to why this may be the case point to the fact that firms feel they can exercise greater business control on the capitalization, enhancement, and management of various task environment resources than they can on institutional ones. The paper concludes by highlighting the need for researchers to be cognizant of the benefits of integrating both task environment and institutional factors and understand how they affect project performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Florence Phua, 2005. "Determining the relationship between fee structure and project performance between firms: an empirical study based on institutional and task environment perspectives," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 45-56.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:23:y:2005:i:1:p:45-56
    DOI: 10.1080/0144619042000287796
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0144619042000287796
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144619042000287796?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Ball & Mahtab Farshchi & Maurizio Grilli, 2000. "Competition and the persistence of profits in the UK construction industry," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(7), pages 733-745.
    2. John Child, 1975. "Managerial And Organizational Factors Associated With Company Performance‐Part Ii. A Contingency Analysis," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(1‐2), pages 12-27, March.
    3. Armstrong, J. Scott & Overton, Terry S., 1977. "Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys," MPRA Paper 81694, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Derek Drew & Po Yin Lai & Heng Li & H. P. Lo, 2002. "Correcting the fee-technical score variability imbalance in two-envelope fee tendering," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 157-166.
    5. Anthony Walker & Robert Newcombe, 2000. "The positive use of power on a major construction project," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 37-44.
    6. C. M. Tam & Z. M. Deng & S. X. Zeng & C. S. Ho, 2000. "Quest for continuous quality improvement for public housing construction in Hong Kong," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 437-446.
    7. Chee Wong & Gary Holt & Patricia Cooper, 2000. "Lowest price or value? Investigation of UK construction clients' tender selection process," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(7), pages 767-774.
    8. Jay B. Barney, 1986. "Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(10), pages 1231-1241, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Florence Phua, 2006. "Predicting construction firm performance: an empirical assessment of the differential impact between industry- and firm-specific factors," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 309-320.
    2. Wang, Chun-Ju & Wu, Lei-Yu, 2012. "Team member commitments and start-up competitiveness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(5), pages 708-715.
    3. Santanu Mandal & Souvik Roy & G. Amar Raju, 2016. "Tourism supply chain agility: an empirical examination using resource-based view," International Journal of Business Forecasting and Marketing Intelligence, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(2), pages 151-173.
    4. Richard Arend, 2013. "Ethics-focused dynamic capabilities: a small business perspective," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 1-24, June.
    5. Rivera-Camino, Jaime & Mejia, Luis Gomez, 2006. "Management education in Ibero-America: An exploratory analysis and perspective," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 205-220, September.
    6. Zhongfeng Su & En Xie & Dong Wang & Yuan Li, 2011. "Entrepreneurial strategy making, resources, and firm performance: evidence from China," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 235-247, February.
    7. Dheeraj Sharma & Shaheen Borna & James Stearns, 2009. "An Investigation of the Effects of Corporate Ethical Values on Employee Commitment and Performance: Examining the Moderating Role of Perceived Fairness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 89(2), pages 251-260, October.
    8. Takata, Hidesuke, 2016. "Effects of industry forces, market orientation, and marketing capabilities on business performance: An empirical analysis of Japanese manufacturers from 2009 to 2011," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5611-5619.
    9. Isobe, Takehiko & Makino, Shige & Montgomery, David B., 2002. "Performance Impact of Technological Assets and Reconfiguration Capabilities: The Case of Small Manufacturing Firms in Japan," Research Papers 1768, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    10. Wu, Lei-Yu, 2010. "Applicability of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views under environmental volatility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 27-31, January.
    11. Sherlock, Chelsea & Dibrell, Clay & Memili, Esra, 2023. "The impact of family commitment on firm innovativeness: The mediating role of resource stocks," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 14(3).
    12. Greenley, Gordon E. & Hooley, Graham J. & Rudd, John M., 2005. "Market orientation in a multiple stakeholder orientation context: implications for marketing capabilities and assets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(11), pages 1483-1494, November.
    13. Richard J. Arend, 2008. "Differences in RBV strategic factors and the need to consider opposing factors in turnaround outcomes," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(4), pages 337-355.
    14. Papadas, Karolos-Konstantinos & Avlonitis, George J. & Carrigan, Marylyn & Piha, Lamprini, 2019. "The interplay of strategic and internal green marketing orientation on competitive advantage," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 632-643.
    15. Lei–Yu Wu & Chun–Ju Wang & Cheng–Ping Chen & Lee–Yun Pan, 2008. "Internal Resources, External Network, and Competitiveness during the Growth Stage: A Study of Taiwanese High–Tech Ventures1," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 32(3), pages 529-549, May.
    16. Montserrat Boronat-Navarro & Alexandra García-Joerger, 2019. "Ambidexterity, Alliances and Environmental Management System Adoption in Spanish Hotels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-16, October.
    17. Aspara, Jaakko & Tikkanen, Henrikki, 2013. "Creating novel consumer value vs. capturing value: Strategic emphases and financial performance implications," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(5), pages 593-602.
    18. Judith Cavazos-Arroyo & Rogelio Puente-Diaz, 2019. "The Influence of Marketing Capability in Mexican Social Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-15, August.
    19. Lin, Yini & Wu, Lei-Yu, 2014. "Exploring the role of dynamic capabilities in firm performance under the resource-based view framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 407-413.
    20. Nikolaos G. Theriou, 2015. "Strategic Management Process and the Importance of Structured Formality, Financial and Non-Financial Information," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 3-28.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:23:y:2005:i:1:p:45-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.