IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apmtfi/v9y2002i2p123-141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

American options under uncertain volatility

Author

Listed:
  • Adam Smith

Abstract

The uncertain volatility approach to financial derivatives is extended to American options (which allow early exercise before expiry). The requirement to model at the portfolio level made necessary by the non-linearity of the approach is found to lead to a recursive structure to the exercise possibilities across options. Other novel features include: the optimality sometimes of partial exercise; an interesting resolution to the issues surrounding short options whose exercise is controlled by a buyer counterparty; and the occurrence of a simple game structure for portfolios containing both long and short options. It is demonstrated that the exercise strategies resulting can significantly alter measured uncertain volatility risk. Contrary to the set of attributes for sensible risk measures put forward by Artzner, Delbaen, Eber and Heath, this risk need not be homogenous in portfolio size- forming a convincing argument for weakening this particular requirement.

Suggested Citation

  • Adam Smith, 2002. "American options under uncertain volatility," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 123-141.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:apmtfi:v:9:y:2002:i:2:p:123-141
    DOI: 10.1080/13504860210136730
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13504860210136730
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13504860210136730?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Avellaneda & A. Levy & A. ParAS, 1995. "Pricing and hedging derivative securities in markets with uncertain volatilities," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(2), pages 73-88.
    2. T. J. Lyons, 1995. "Uncertain volatility and the risk-free synthesis of derivatives," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(2), pages 117-133.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marcel Nutz & Jianfeng Zhang, 2012. "Optimal stopping under adverse nonlinear expectation and related games," Papers 1212.2140, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2015.
    2. Huang, Haishi, 2010. "Convertible Bonds: Risks and Optimal Strategies," Bonn Econ Discussion Papers 07/2010, University of Bonn, Bonn Graduate School of Economics (BGSE).
    3. Duy-Minh Dang & Hao Zhou, 2024. "A monotone piecewise constant control integration approach for the two-factor uncertain volatility model," Papers 2402.06840, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antoine Jacquier & Patrick Roome, 2015. "Black-Scholes in a CEV random environment," Papers 1503.08082, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2017.
    2. Li, Xinpeng & Peng, Shige, 2011. "Stopping times and related Itô's calculus with G-Brownian motion," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 121(7), pages 1492-1508, July.
    3. Kim Weston, 2016. "Stability of utility maximization in nonequivalent markets," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 511-541, April.
    4. Chen An & Mahayni Antje B., 2008. "Endowment Assurance Products: Effectiveness of Risk-Minimizing Strategies under Model Risk," Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance, De Gruyter, vol. 2(2), pages 1-29, March.
    5. Peter Carr & Travis Fisher & Johannes Ruf, 2014. "On the hedging of options on exploding exchange rates," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 115-144, January.
    6. Daniel Bartl & Michael Kupper & David J. Prömel & Ludovic Tangpi, 2019. "Duality for pathwise superhedging in continuous time," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 697-728, July.
    7. Maxim Bichuch & Agostino Capponi & Stephan Sturm, 2018. "Robust XVA," Papers 1808.04908, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2020.
    8. Park, Kyunghyun & Wong, Hoi Ying & Yan, Tingjin, 2023. "Robust retirement and life insurance with inflation risk and model ambiguity," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 1-30.
    9. Giorgio Fabbri & Fausto Gozzi & Andrzej Swiech, 2017. "Stochastic Optimal Control in Infinite Dimensions - Dynamic Programming and HJB Equations," Post-Print hal-01505767, HAL.
    10. Sergey Nadtochiy & Jan Obłój, 2017. "Robust Trading Of Implied Skew," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(02), pages 1-41, March.
    11. Julian Holzermann, 2019. "Term Structure Modeling under Volatility Uncertainty," Papers 1904.02930, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2021.
    12. Daniel Bartl & Michael Kupper & Ariel Neufeld, 2020. "Pathwise superhedging on prediction sets," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 215-248, January.
    13. Dirk Becherer & Klebert Kentia, 2017. "Good Deal Hedging and Valuation under Combined Uncertainty about Drift and Volatility," Papers 1704.02505, arXiv.org.
    14. Rosella Castellano & Roy Cerqueti, 2013. "Roots and effects of financial misperception in a stochastic dominance framework," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 3371-3389, October.
    15. Jean-Pierre Fouque & Ning Ning, 2017. "Uncertain Volatility Models with Stochastic Bounds," Papers 1702.05036, arXiv.org.
    16. Yuecai Han & Chunyang Liu, 2018. "Asian Option Pricing under Uncertain Volatility Model," Papers 1808.00656, arXiv.org.
    17. Shige Peng & Shuzhen Yang, 2020. "Distributional uncertainty of the financial time series measured by G-expectation," Papers 2011.09226, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.
    18. Marcel Nutz & Jianfeng Zhang, 2012. "Optimal stopping under adverse nonlinear expectation and related games," Papers 1212.2140, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2015.
    19. Mun-Chol Kim & Song-Chol Ryom, 2022. "Pathwise superhedging under proportional transaction costs," Mathematics and Financial Economics, Springer, volume 16, number 4, March.
    20. Christian Bender & Nikolaus Schweizer, 2019. "`Regression Anytime' with Brute-Force SVD Truncation," Papers 1908.08264, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2020.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apmtfi:v:9:y:2002:i:2:p:123-141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAMF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.