IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acctbr/v36y2006is1p65-88.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does sustainability reporting improve corporate behaviour?: Wrong question? Right time?

Author

Listed:
  • Rob Gray

Abstract

This paper takes its starting point from the ICAEW's ‘Sustainability: the role of accountants’ - one of the outputs from the Institute's Information for Better Markets initiative. In particular, an important series of questions arise around the extent to which (if at all) accountants can encourage - and should be encouraging ? the development of substantive social, environmental and sustainability reporting by large organisations and the extent to which such reporting should be governed by financial market principles and exigencies. The relationship(s) between social, environmental and financial performance and reporting are of increasing significance in this context and this significance is reflected in considerable growing interest in the business, accounting and political communities. At the heart of the matter, there is the tantalising suggestion that social responsibility, financial performance and voluntary sustainability reporting may be mutually constitutive and mutually reinforcing. That such a suggestion is, a priori, highly implausible seems to attract less interest. This paper seeks to investigate these matters in some detail by considering. in turn, what is meant by ‘sustainability’. the current state of affairs in ‘sustainability reporting’? and the extent to which social disclosure can be said to be related to the social and/or financial performance of organisations. The analysis suggests that the question set for this paper is mis-specified, that ‘sustainability’? reporting consistently fails to address sustainability and the increasing claims that financial and social performance are mutually determined and determining is probably incorrect and founded upon a tautology. The central theme of the paper is that sustainability is a matter of such concern that it must be treated as at least as important as any other criteria currently facing business, that sustainability reporting needs to be developed in a mandatory context as urgently as possible and that continuing focus upon the tautologies of social responsibility is a particularly foolish and dangerous enterprise.

Suggested Citation

  • Rob Gray, 2006. "Does sustainability reporting improve corporate behaviour?: Wrong question? Right time?," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(S1), pages 65-88.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:36:y:2006:i:s1:p:65-88
    DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2006.9730048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00014788.2006.9730048
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00014788.2006.9730048?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lomborg,Bjørn, 2001. "The Skeptical Environmentalist," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521010689.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. James A. Brander, 2007. "Viewpoint: Sustainability: Malthus revisited?," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(1), pages 1-38, February.
    2. Jennifer Marohasy, 2005. "Australia's Environment Undergoing Renewal, Not Collapse," Energy & Environment, , vol. 16(3-4), pages 457-480, July.
    3. Mohajan, Haradhan, 2011. "Green marketing is a sustainable marketing system in the twenty first century," MPRA Paper 50857, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 16 Feb 2012.
    4. Kopnina Helen, 2010. "Global Environmental Politics and the Grand Old Theory of ‘Human Nature’," Jadavpur Journal of International Relations, , vol. 14(1), pages 83-105, June.
    5. Peter Jacques, 2006. "How should corporations deal with environmental scepticism?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 25-36, February.
    6. Van Passel, Steven, 2008. "Assessing farm sustainability with value oriented methods," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 44141, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Bruce R. Conard, 2013. "Some Challenges to Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(8), pages 1-14, August.
    8. Nicolas Charles & Gaétan Lefebvre & Rémy Tuloup & Audrey Carreaud & Antoine Boubault & Anne-Sophie Serrand & Maxime Picault & Virginie Piguet & Valeria Manzin & Fabien Deswarte & Julien Aupoil, 2023. "Mineral Resource Abundance: An Assessment Methodology for a Responsible Use of Mineral Raw Materials in Downstream Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-39, December.
    9. Al Rawashdeh, Rami, 2020. "World peak potash: An analytical study," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    10. Søren H. Wenstøp & Fred Wenstøp, 2016. "Operational research virtues in the face of climate change," EURO Journal on Decision Processes, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 4(1), pages 53-72, June.
    11. Shunsuke Mori, 2006. "Role of integrated assessment and scenario development issues beyond SRES," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 7(3), pages 315-330, September.
    12. Andrea Bigano & Aleksander Śniegocki & Jacopo Zotti, 2016. "Policies for a More Dematerialized EU Economy. Theoretical Underpinnings, Political Context and Expected Feasibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-22, July.
    13. Raymond Murphy & Riley Dunlap, 2012. "Beyond the society/nature divide: building on the sociology of William Freudenburg," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 2(1), pages 7-17, March.
    14. David A. Freedman, 2009. "Limits of Econometrics," International Econometric Review (IER), Econometric Research Association, vol. 1(1), pages 5-17, April.
    15. Martin Jänicke, 2005. "Voraussetzungen effizienter Klimastrategie: Anmerkungen aus Sicht der Politikanalyse," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 74(2), pages 208-216.
    16. Ramya Vijaya, 2006. "Book Reviews," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 65(3), pages 349-385.
    17. Nicholas Oulton, 2012. "Hooray for GDP!," CentrePiece - The magazine for economic performance 383, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    18. Mongelli, I. & Tassielli, G. & Notarnicola, B., 2006. "Global warming agreements, international trade and energy/carbon embodiments: an input-output approach to the Italian case," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 88-100, January.
    19. Joseph DiMento, 2007. "From resource scarcity to ecological security: exploring new limits to growth, by Dennis Pirages and Ken Cousins, The MIT Press, 2005, ISBN-10: 0-262-66189-6," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 99-103, March.
    20. David J. Pannell, 2004. "Effectively communicating economics to policy makers," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 48(3), pages 535-555, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:36:y:2006:i:s1:p:65-88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.