IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ssi/jouesi/v3y2015i2p186-197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors influencing social innovation processes in Latvia: qualitative research perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Karine Oganisjana

    (Riga Technical University, Latvia)

  • Svetlana Surikova

    (University of Latvia, Latvia)

  • Tālis Laizāns

    (Riga Technical University, Latvia)

Abstract

The research reflected in this paper aimed at the determination of social innovation influencing factors in the Latvian context. The qualitative content analysis of the scripts made from the video recordings of the focus group discussion organized with participation of representatives of the fields of entrepreneurship, education, communication, sport and charity, revealed that social innovation influencing factors have dual nature. That duality manifests itself as both promoting and hindering effects of social innovation influencing factors depending on the presence and development level of specific characteristics of the factor, as well as on the context within which the factor acts. The empirical data were analysed with open coding using AQUAD 6 software for the registration of conceptual codes, data processing and creation of frequency tables of categories developed. The research resulted in the revelation of ten social innovation influencing factors: openness to novelty, consciousness, responsibility, proactive thinking, lifelong learning, positive experience, passivity, conservative thinking, power distance and bureaucracy.

Suggested Citation

  • Karine Oganisjana & Svetlana Surikova & Tālis Laizāns, 2015. "Factors influencing social innovation processes in Latvia: qualitative research perspective," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 3(2), pages 186-197, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:3:y:2015:i:2:p:186-197
    DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2015.3.2(6)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/uploads/articles/10/Oganisjana_Factors_influencing_social_innovation_processes_in_Latvia_qualitative_research_perspective.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/70
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.9770/jesi.2015.3.2(6)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geoff Mulgan, 2006. "The Process of Social Innovation," Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, MIT Press, vol. 1(2), pages 145-162, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Francisco Adro & Cristina I. Fernandes, 2020. "Social innovation: a systematic literature review and future agenda research," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 17(1), pages 23-40, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barbara Bradač Hojnik & Katja Crnogaj, 2020. "Social Impact, Innovations, and Market Activity of Social Enterprises: Comparison of European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Gianluca Misuraca & Clelia Colombo & Csaba Kucsera & Stephanie Carretero & Margherita Bacigalupo & Raluca Radescu, 2015. "ICT-enabled Social Innovation in support of the Implementation of the Social Investment Package (IESI) - Mapping and Analysis of ICT-enabled Social Innovation Initiatives promoting Social Investment t," JRC Research Reports JRC97467, Joint Research Centre.
    3. Baran Grzegorz, 2020. "Social Innovation Living Labs as Platforms to Co-design Social Innovations," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 36-57, March.
    4. Boeing, Philipp & Wang, Yihan, 2021. "Decoding China's Covid-19 "virus exceptionalism": Community-based digital contact tracing in Wuhan," ZEW Discussion Papers 21-028, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    5. Shr-Wei Kao & Pin Luarn, 2020. "Topic Modeling Analysis of Social Enterprises: Twitter Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, April.
    6. Attila Havas & Doris Schartinger & K. Matthias Weber, 2022. "Innovation Studies, Social Innovation, and Sustainability Transitions Research: From mutual ignorance towards an integrative perspective?," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 2227, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    7. Mustafa Raza Rabbani & Abu Bashar & Nishad Nawaz & Sitara Karim & Mahmood Asad Mohd. Ali & Habeeb Ur Rahiman & Md. Shabbir Alam, 2021. "Exploring the Role of Islamic Fintech in Combating the Aftershocks of COVID-19: The Open Social Innovation of the Islamic Financial System," JOItmC, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-19, May.
    8. Chiara Certomà, 2020. "Digital Social Innovation and Urban Space: A Critical Geography Agenda," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 8-19.
    9. Szabolcs Nagy & Mariann Veresne Somosi, 2022. "The relationship between social innovation and digital economy and society," Papers 2212.13840, arXiv.org.
    10. Germán Jaraíz Arroyo & Auxiliadora González Portillo, 2020. "Focus on Weaknesses or Strengths? Determining Factors for an Inclusive and Relational Management in Public Community Social Service Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Silvia Stuchi & Sonia Paulino & Faïz Gallouj, 2022. "Social Innovation in Active Mobility Public Services in the Megacity of Sao Paulo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, September.
    12. Maribel Guerrero & David Urbano, 2020. "Institutional conditions and social innovations in emerging economies: insights from Mexican enterprises’ initiatives for protecting/preventing the effect of violent events," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 929-957, August.
    13. Ângela Maria Maurer & Tânia Nunes da Silva, 2014. "Analytical Dimensions for Identifying Social Innovations: Evidence from Collective Enterprises," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 11(6), pages 123-145, December.
    14. White, Leroy, 2018. "A Cook's tour: Towards a framework for measuring the social impact of social purpose organisations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(3), pages 784-797.
    15. Azio Barani, 2015. "Parte quarta: welfare, economia e societ?. Quale innovazione sociale e quale societ? nel ripensare nuovi sistemi di welfare?," QUADERNI DI ECONOMIA DEL LAVORO, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(103), pages 317-335.
    16. Hugo Pinto & Carla Nogueira & J. André Guerreiro & Fábio Sampaio, 2021. "Social Innovation and the Role of the State: Learning from the Portuguese Experience on Multi-Level Interactions," World, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-19, January.
    17. Saori Yasumoto & Yasuyuki Gondo, 2021. "CBSI as a Social Innovation to Promote the Health of Older People in Japan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-13, May.
    18. Michael Odei Erdiaw‐Kwasie & Matthew Abunyewah, 2024. "Determinants of social innovation in hybrid organisations: The moderating role of technology readiness," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 1099-1112, February.
    19. Wendy Phillips & Elizabeth A. Alexander & Hazel Lee, 2019. "Going It Alone Won’t Work! The Relational Imperative for Social Innovation in Social Enterprises," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(2), pages 315-331, May.
    20. Paolo Popoli, 2017. "Corporate Social Innovation in Comparison with Corporate Social Responsibility: Integration, Development or Replacement?," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(10), pages 148-155, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    social innovation; influencing factors; duality of influence; qualitative research; Latvia;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:3:y:2015:i:2:p:186-197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Manuela Tvaronaviciene (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.