IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ssi/jouesi/v10y2022i1p10-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Peculiarities of values transfer among countries via arts digitalization

Author

Listed:
  • Michał Szostak

    (University of Social Sciences, Poland)

Abstract

The aesthetic experience digitalisation influences the capacity of artistry and creativity of the artwork and the quality of participation in arts. Due to cultural differences between post-communist and non-communist countries’ citizens in perception qualities, this research aims to evaluate the influence of the participation form (in-real or digital) in the aesthetic situation by the receivers from post-communist and non-communist societies on artistry and creativity potential in the context of cultural and social sustainability. The quality of participation in five arts types (musical, performing, literary, audio-visual, visual) was evaluated using the same ten criteria. Qualitative data analysis based on an international sample from 38 countries (n = 221) concludes that the participation form in arts determines participation quality level in the aesthetic situation by post-communist and non-communist countries’ receivers differently. There are significant cultural determinants among post-communist and non-communist countries’ citizens between participation in particular arts and between particular forms of participation in particular types of arts. The reasons for these differences cannot be drawn from this research; however, future comparative qualitative research directions are set. The research results, in the context of the political system transformation theory as one of the sustainable development features, should gain the interest of: 1) Art creators looking for the optimal and sustainable way of distributing artworks among receivers from post-communist and non-communist countries; 2) Art managers and marketers for deeper understanding of post-communist and non-communist art receivers’ perspectives and their preferences about participation in arts in-real or digitally towards sustainable development; 3) Art receivers to compare their opinion about the ways of sustainable participation in arts with the preferences of art receivers from post-communist and non-communist countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Michał Szostak, 2022. "Peculiarities of values transfer among countries via arts digitalization," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 10(1), pages 10-49, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:10:y:2022:i:1:p:10-49
    DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2022.10.1(1)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/uploads/articles/37/Szostak_Peculiarities_of_values_transfer_among_countries_via_arts_digitalization.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/982
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.9770/jesi.2022.10.1(1)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agostino Vollero & Alfonso Siano & Maria Palazzo & Sara Amabile, 2020. "Hoftsede's cultural dimensions and corporate social responsibility in online communication: Are they independent constructs?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 53-64, January.
    2. Brian J. Hracs, 2015. "Cultural Intermediaries in the Digital Age: The Case of Independent Musicians and Managers in Toronto," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(3), pages 461-475, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Szostak Michał & Baghzou Djalel & Kamran Muhammad & Bouameur Assala Belsem, 2023. "Impact of Digitalization on Visual Arts Consumers’ Behavior during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Generational Perspective of Art Management," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 15(2), pages 45-77, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jesús J. Cambra‐Fierro & J. Alfredo Flores‐Hernández & Lourdes Pérez & Guadalupe Valera‐Blanes, 2020. "CSR and branding in emerging economies: The effect of incomes and education," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2765-2776, November.
    2. Szostak Michał & Baghzou Djalel & Kamran Muhammad & Bouameur Assala Belsem, 2023. "Impact of Digitalization on Visual Arts Consumers’ Behavior during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Generational Perspective of Art Management," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 15(2), pages 45-77, June.
    3. Syed Hassan Raza & Umer Zaman & Moneeba Iftikhar & Owais Shafique, 2021. "An Experimental Evidence on Eco-Friendly Advertisement Appeals and Intention to Use Bio-Nanomaterial Plastics: Institutional Collectivism and Performance Orientation as Moderators," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Ye Sang & Eunkyoung Han, 2023. "A win‐win way for corporate and stakeholders to achieve sustainable development: Corporate social responsibility value co‐creation scale development and validation," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1177-1190, May.
    5. Azzellini, Dario & Greer, Ian & Umney, Charles, 2019. "Limits of the platform economy: Digitalization and marketization in live music," Working Paper Forschungsförderung 154, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    6. Michał Szostak, 2021. "Impact of gender differences in perception of creative identities of artist, creator, manager, entrepreneur and leader on sustainability," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 9(2), pages 10-36, December.
    7. Nitika Sharma & Arminda Paço & Raysa Geaquinto Rocha & Maria Palazzo & Alfonso Siano, 2024. "Examining a theoretical model of eco‐anxiety on consumers' intentions towards green products," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1868-1885, May.
    8. Fabrizio Montanari & Annachiara Scapolan & Lorenzo Mizzau, 2018. "Embeddedness and locational choices: A study of creative workers in a dance organisation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(5), pages 1121-1138, April.
    9. Szostak Michał, 2021. "Does Polish Post-Communist Cultural Burden Influence the Perception of Creative Identities?," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 13(2), pages 29-58, June.
    10. Liao, Feimei & Hu, Yaoyao & Chen, Mengjie & Xu, Shulin, 2024. "Digital transformation and corporate green supply chain efficiency: Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 195-207.
    11. Wenceslas Lizé & Ian Greer & Charles Umney, 2022. "Artistic work intermediaries as industrial relations institutions: The case of musicians," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(2), pages 793-809, May.
    12. Paolo Esposito & Paolo Ricci, 2021. "Cultural organizations, digital Corporate Social Responsibility and stakeholder engagement in virtual museums: a multiple case study. How digitization is influencing the attitude toward CSR," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 953-964, March.
    13. Cronin, Anne M & Edwards, Lee, 2022. "Resituating the political in cultural intermediary work: charity sector public relations and communication," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108897, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Michał Szostak, 2022. "Peculiarities of art management in a digital context – case study of Poland," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 9(4), pages 10-44, June.
    15. McMullen, Jeffery S. & Ding, Amy Wenxuan & Li, Shibo, 2021. "From cultural entrepreneurship to economic entrepreneurship in cultural industries: The role of digital serialization," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(6).
    16. Bharath Ramkumar & Hongjoo Woo & Naeun (Lauren) Kim, 2021. "The cross‐cultural effects of brand status and social facilitation on enhancing consumer perception toward circular fashion services," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(4), pages 1254-1269, July.
    17. Michal Szostak, 2021. "Post-communist Burden Influence on the Perception of Crea-tive Identities: Consequences for Managers and Leaders," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 282-302.
    18. Zbysław Dobrowolski & Grzegorz Drozdowski & Mirela Panait, 2022. "Understanding the Impact of Generation Z on Risk Management—A Preliminary Views on Values, Competencies, and Ethics of the Generation Z in Public Administration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-13, March.
    19. Isabel Gallego-Álvarez & María Consuelo Pucheta-Martínez, 2021. "Hofstede’s cultural dimensions and R&D intensity as an innovation strategy: a view from different institutional contexts," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(2), pages 191-220, June.
    20. Feimei Liao & Yaoyao Hu & Yinghao Sun & Songqin Ye, 2024. "Does digital empowerment affect corporate green investment efficiency?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(9), pages 23085-23111, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    cultural differences; sustainability; creativity; artistry loss; participation in arts; arts management; aesthetics; aesthetic situation; receiving process; art perception;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
    • P52 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Comparative Economic Systems - - - Comparative Studies of Particular Economies
    • Z10 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - General
    • Z11 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economics of the Arts and Literature

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:10:y:2022:i:1:p:10-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Manuela Tvaronaviciene (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.