IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spt/apfiba/v7y2017i3f7_3_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Traditional Budgeting in Today’s Business Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Asogwa
  • Ikenna Elias
  • Etim
  • Osim Etim

Abstract

Traditional budgeting has been subject to several controversies with many arguing in favour and against its use. The two sided arguments were discussed with the help of existing literatures. This research provides a conceptual meaning of traditional budgeting as an examination of income with respect to expenditure and developed a model framework for understanding the usefulness of traditional budgeting in today’s business environment. A tripod relationship between budget, household and managers was developed & analysed. The research explains the benefits of traditional budgeting and also provides an alternative to traditional budgeting concept in today’s business world. The study shows that influence of organisational culture was seen to constitute the bane of traditional budgeting process, implementation and performance management with control as the critical variable at all levels of human endeavours and concludes that budgeting is the panacea for enforcement of control, target, and accountability. It entrenches motivational spirit & managerial direction among workforce, hence should be adopted by both individuals and business entities.JEL Classification Numbers: M41Keywords: Traditional Budgeting, Planning, Household, Management, Organisations

Suggested Citation

  • Asogwa & Ikenna Elias & Etim & Osim Etim, 2017. "Traditional Budgeting in Today’s Business Environment," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 7(3), pages 1-7.
    • Handle: RePEc:spt:apfiba:v:7:y:2017:i:3:f:7_3_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.scienpress.com/Upload/JAFB%2fVol%207_3_7.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Allen Schick, 2007. "Performance Budgeting and Accrual Budgeting: Decision rules or Analytic Tools?," OECD Journal on Budgeting, OECD Publishing, vol. 7(2), pages 109-138.
    2. Dunk, Alan S., 1990. "Budgetary participation, agreement on evaluation criteria and managerial performance: A research note," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 171-178.
    3. Ozer, Gokhan & Yilmaz, Emine, 2011. "Effects of Procedural Justice Perception, Budgetary Control Effectiveness and Ethical Work Climate on Propensity to Create Budgetary Slack," Business and Economics Research Journal, Uludag University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, vol. 2(4), pages 1-1, October.
    4. Magner, Nace & Welker, Robert B. & Campbell, Terry L., 1995. "The interactive effect of budgetary participation and budget favorability on attitudes toward budgetary decision makers: A research note," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 20(7-8), pages 611-618.
    5. Briers, Michael & Hirst, Mark, 1990. "The role of budgetary information in performance evaluation," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 373-398.
    6. Dongsung Kong, 2005. "Performance-Based Budgeting: The U.S. Experience," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 91-107, June.
    7. Bo-Goran Ekholm & Jan Wallin, 2000. "Is the annual budget really dead?," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 519-539.
    8. Tor Busch & Ove Gustafsson, 2002. "Slack in the Public Sector: A comparative analysis of a private and a public enterprise for refuse collection," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 167-186, January.
    9. Brownell, P, 1982. "The Role Of Accounting Data In Performance Evaluation, Budgetary Participation, And Organizational-Effectiveness," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(1), pages 12-27.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shields, J. F. & Shields, M. D., 1998. "Antecedents of participative budgeting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 49-76, January.
    2. Staci A. Kenno & Michelle C. Lau & Barbara J. Sainty, 2018. "In Search of a Theory of Budgeting: A Literature Review," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), pages 507-553, December.
    3. Hartmann, Frank G. H. & Moers, Frank, 1999. "Testing contingency hypotheses in budgetary research: an evaluation of the use of moderated regression analysis," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 291-315, May.
    4. Derfuss, Klaus, 2016. "Reconsidering the participative budgeting–performance relation: A meta-analysis regarding the impact of level of analysis, sample selection, measurement, and industry influences," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 17-37.
    5. Luft, Joan & Shields, Michael D., 2003. "Mapping management accounting: graphics and guidelines for theory-consistent empirical research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 169-249.
    6. Jan Noeverman & Bas A.S. Koene & Roger Williams, 2005. "Construct measurement of evaluative style: a review and proposal," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 2(1), pages 77-107, April.
    7. Van der Stede, Wim A. & Young, S. Mark & Chen, Clara Xiaoling, 2005. "Assessing the quality of evidence in empirical management accounting research: The case of survey studies," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(7-8), pages 655-684.
    8. Hartmann, Frank G. H., 2000. "The appropriateness of RAPM: toward the further development of theory," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 25(4-5), pages 451-482, May.
    9. Mu-Jung Huang & Kuo-Chih Cheng & Shao-Hsi Chung & Huo-Ming Wang & Kuo-Hua Wang, 2021. "Budget Participation Capacity Configuration (BPCC), Budgeting Participation Requirement and Product Innovation Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-12, May.
    10. Nava Subramaniam & Neal M. Ashkanasy, 2001. "The Effect of Organisational Culture Perceptions on the Relationship Between Budgetary Participation and Managerial Job-Related Outcomes," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 26(1), pages 35-54, June.
    11. Christian Daumoser & Bernhard Hirsch & Matthias Sohn, 2018. "Honesty in budgeting: a review of morality and control aspects in the budgetary slack literature," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 115-159, August.
    12. Marginson, David & Ogden, Stuart, 2005. "Coping with ambiguity through the budget: the positive effects of budgetary targets on managers' budgeting behaviours," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 435-456, July.
    13. Chow, Chee W. & Shields, Michael D. & Wu, Anne, 1999. "The importance of national culture in the design of and preference for management controls for multi-national operations," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 24(5-6), pages 441-461, July.
    14. Vagneur, K. & Peiperl, M., 2000. "Reconsidering performance evaluative style," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 25(4-5), pages 511-525, May.
    15. Samuel Sponem, 2002. "L'Explication De La Diversite Des Pratiques Budgetaires : Une Approche Contingente," Post-Print halshs-00584534, HAL.
    16. Lau, Chong M. & Low, Liang C. & Eggleton, Ian R. C., 1995. "The impact of reliance on accounting performance measures on job-related tension and managerial performance: Additional evidence," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 359-381, July.
    17. Charpentier, Claes, 1998. "Budgetary Participation in a Public Service Organization," SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Business Administration 3, Stockholm School of Economics.
    18. O'Connor, Neale G., 1995. "The influence of organizational culture on the usefulness of budget participation by Singaporean-Chinese managers," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 383-403, July.
    19. Otley, David & Fakiolas, Alexander, 2000. "Reliance on accounting performance measures: dead end or new beginning?," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 25(4-5), pages 497-510, May.
    20. Langevin, Pascal & Mendoza, Carla, 2013. "How can management control system fairness reduce managers’ unethical behaviours?," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 209-222.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spt:apfiba:v:7:y:2017:i:3:f:7_3_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eleftherios Spyromitros-Xioufis (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.scienpress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.