IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmgr/v4y2002i2p167-186.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Slack in the Public Sector: A comparative analysis of a private and a public enterprise for refuse collection

Author

Listed:
  • Tor Busch
  • Ove Gustafsson

Abstract

There are currently strong external pressures in place to increase efficiency in the public sector. The reason for these pressures is an assumption that due to agency problems and opportunism, public enterprises have a tendency to accumulate slack, i.e. to develop lower efficiency compared to what might be achievable in the private sector. Private enterprises form the basis for comparison, and new management techniques are often transferred from the private to the public sector. This article is based on a case study involving two refuse collection enterprises: one public and one from the private sector. Both work in the same market and apply the same technology. The purpose is to investigate whether there are indications of slack in the public refuse collection enterprise, and whether the management control systems applied are suitable for controlling the level of slack. Moreover, additional focus is placed on the differences in management between the two enterprises, representing the public and private sector, respectively. The results indicate that the public refuse collection enterprise had a higher level of slack than the private enterprise, and that the management control systems were not suitable for reducing the level of slack to any significant extent. In the private enterprise, there was a higher degree of budgetary emphasis, the owners made greater demands, employees were more closely supervised and there was a greater degree of participation. In this article, we discuss whether these results may contribute towards explaining any differences in efficiency that may occur between private and public enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Tor Busch & Ove Gustafsson, 2002. "Slack in the Public Sector: A comparative analysis of a private and a public enterprise for refuse collection," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 167-186, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmgr:v:4:y:2002:i:2:p:167-186
    DOI: 10.1080/14616670210130525
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14616670210130525
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14616670210130525?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Asogwa & Ikenna Elias & Etim & Osim Etim, 2017. "Traditional Budgeting in Today’s Business Environment," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 7(3), pages 1-7.
    2. Jivas Chakravarthy & Katie E. McDermott & Roger M. White, 2021. "Are Regulators Effective at Unraveling Accounting Manipulation? Evidence from Public Utility Commissions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(7), pages 4532-4555, July.
    3. Ratna Ayu Damayanti, 2018. "Restoration of Budget Control: How It Should Be? A Case Study of the Local Government of Indonesia," GATR Journals afr161, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    4. Trkman, Marina & Trkman, Peter, 2014. "Actors’ misaligned interests to explain the low impact of an information system – A case study," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 296-307.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pubmgr:v:4:y:2002:i:2:p:167-186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPXM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.