IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v36y2022i9d10.1007_s11269-022-03191-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling Multi-objective Pareto-optimal Reservoir Operation Policies Using State-of-the-art Modeling Techniques

Author

Listed:
  • Aadhityaa Mohanavelu

    (Amrita School of Engineering, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham)

  • Bankaru-Swamy Soundharajan

    (Amrita School of Engineering, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham)

  • Ozgur Kisi

    (Ilia State University)

Abstract

A novel challenge faced by water scientists and water managers today is the efficient management of the available water resources for meeting crucial demands such as drinking water supply, irrigation and hydro-power generation. Optimal operation of reservoirs is of paramount importance for better management of scarce water resources under competing multiple demands such as irrigation, water supply etc., with decreasing reliability of these systems under climate change. This study compares six different state-of-the-art modeling techniques namely; Deterministic Dynamic Programming (DDP), Stochastic Dynamic Programming (SDP), Implicit Stochastic Optimization (ISO), Fitted Q-Iteration (FQI), Sampling Stochastic Dynamic Programming (SSDP), and Model Predictive Control (MPC), in developing pareto-optimal reservoir operation solutions considering two competing operational objectives of irrigation and flood control for the Pong reservoir located in Beas River, India. Set of pareto-optimal (approximate) solutions were derived using the above-mentioned six methods based on different convex combinations of the two objectives and finally the performances of the resulting sets of pareto-optimal solutions were compared. Additionally, key reservoir performance indices including resilience, reliability, vulnerability and sustainability were estimated to study the performance of the current operation of the reservoir. Modeling results indicate that the optimal-operational solution developed by DDP attains the best performance followed by the MPC and FQI. The performance of the Pong reservoir operation assessed by comparing different performance indices suggests that there is high vulnerability (~ 0.65) and low resilience (~ 0.10) in current operations and the development of pareto-optimal operation solutions using multiple state-of-the-art modeling techniques might be crucial for making better reservoir operation decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Aadhityaa Mohanavelu & Bankaru-Swamy Soundharajan & Ozgur Kisi, 2022. "Modeling Multi-objective Pareto-optimal Reservoir Operation Policies Using State-of-the-art Modeling Techniques," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(9), pages 3107-3128, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:36:y:2022:i:9:d:10.1007_s11269-022-03191-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-022-03191-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-022-03191-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-022-03191-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arvin Samadi-koucheksaraee & Iman Ahmadianfar & Omid Bozorg-Haddad & Seyed Amin Asghari-pari, 2019. "Gradient Evolution Optimization Algorithm to Optimize Reservoir Operation Systems," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(2), pages 603-625, January.
    2. Mohsen Saadat & Keyvan Asghari, 2017. "Reliability Improved Stochastic Dynamic Programming for Reservoir Operation Optimization," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(6), pages 1795-1807, April.
    3. Mohammad Heydari & Faridah Othman & Kourosh Qaderi, 2015. "Developing Optimal Reservoir Operation for Multiple and Multipurpose Reservoirs Using Mathematical Programming," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-11, February.
    4. Aida Tayebiyan & Thamer Ahmed Mohammed Ali & Abdul Halim Ghazali & M. A. Malek, 2016. "Optimization of Exclusive Release Policies for Hydropower Reservoir Operation by Using Genetic Algorithm," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(3), pages 1203-1216, February.
    5. Majid Mohammadi & Saeed Farzin & Sayed-Farhad Mousavi & Hojat Karami, 2019. "Investigation of a New Hybrid Optimization Algorithm Performance in the Optimal Operation of Multi-Reservoir Benchmark Systems," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(14), pages 4767-4782, November.
    6. Mohammad S. Khorshidi & Mohammad Reza Nikoo & Mojtaba Sadegh & Banafsheh Nematollahi, 2019. "A Multi-Objective Risk-Based Game Theoretic Approach to Reservoir Operation Policy in Potential Future Drought Condition," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(6), pages 1999-2014, April.
    7. M. Reddy & D. Kumar, 2006. "Optimal Reservoir Operation Using Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 20(6), pages 861-878, December.
    8. Thomas Saaty & Saul Gass, 1954. "Parametric Objective Function (Part 1)," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 316-319, August.
    9. K. Srinivasan & Kranthi Kumar, 2018. "Multi-Objective Simulation-Optimization Model for Long-term Reservoir Operation using Piecewise Linear Hedging Rule," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(5), pages 1901-1911, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Suwapat Kosasaeng & Nirat Yamoat & Seyed Mohammad Ashrafi & Anongrit Kangrang, 2022. "Extracting Optimal Operation Rule Curves of Multi-Reservoir System Using Atom Search Optimization, Genetic Programming and Wind Driven Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Xinyu Wu & Shuai Yin & Chuntian Cheng & Zhiyong Chen & Huaying Su, 2023. "SSDP Model with Inflow Clustering for Hydropower System Operation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(3), pages 1109-1123, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Deji Baima & Guoyuan Qian & Jingzhen Luo & Pengcheng Wang & Hao Zheng & Jinwen Wang, 2024. "Monthly Hydropower Scheduling of Cascaded Reservoirs Using a Genetic Algorithm with a Simulation Procedure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Behrang Beiranvand & Parisa-Sadat Ashofteh, 2023. "A Systematic Review of Optimization of Dams Reservoir Operation Using the Meta-heuristic Algorithms," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(9), pages 3457-3526, July.
    3. Moura de Figueiredo, Nelio & Cavalcante Blanco, Claudio José & Pinheiro Campos Filho, Lúcio Carlos & Amarante Mesquita, André Luiz, 2023. "MUWOS - Multiple use water optimization system for the power generation and navigation trade-offs analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 205-218.
    4. Zaher Mundher Yaseen & Mohammad Ehteram & Md. Shabbir Hossain & Chow Ming Fai & Suhana Binti Koting & Nuruol Syuhadaa Mohd & Wan Zurina Binti Jaafar & Haitham Abdulmohsin Afan & Lai Sai Hin & Nuratiah, 2019. "A Novel Hybrid Evolutionary Data-Intelligence Algorithm for Irrigation and Power Production Management: Application to Multi-Purpose Reservoir Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-28, April.
    5. Ramtin Moeini & Kamran Nasiri & Seyed Hossein Hosseini, 2024. "Predicting the Water Inflow Into the Dam Reservoir Using the Hybrid Intelligent GP-ANN- NSGA-II Method," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 38(11), pages 4137-4159, September.
    6. T. Fowe & I. Nouiri & B. Ibrahim & H. Karambiri & J. Paturel, 2015. "OPTIWAM: An Intelligent Tool for Optimizing Irrigation Water Management in Coupled Reservoir–Groundwater Systems," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(10), pages 3841-3861, August.
    7. Mohammad Ehteram & Hojat Karami & Sayed Farhad Mousavi & Saaed Farzin & Alcigeimes B. Celeste & Ahmad-El Shafie, 2018. "Reservoir Operation by a New Evolutionary Algorithm: Kidney Algorithm," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(14), pages 4681-4706, November.
    8. M. Janga Reddy & S. Adarsh, 2010. "Chance Constrained Optimal Design of Composite Channels Using Meta-Heuristic Techniques," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 24(10), pages 2221-2235, August.
    9. Mina Khosravi & Abbas Afshar & Amir Molajou, 2022. "Decision Tree-Based Conditional Operation Rules for Optimal Conjunctive Use of Surface and Groundwater," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(6), pages 2013-2025, April.
    10. Omar A. de la Cruz Courtois & Maritza Liliana Arganis Juárez & Delva Guichard Romero, 2021. "Simulated Optimal Operation Policies of a Reservoir System Obtained with Continuous Functions Using Synthetic Inflows," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(7), pages 2249-2263, May.
    11. Xue Li & Jian Sha & Yue Zhao & Zhong-Liang Wang, 2019. "Estimating the Responses of Hydrological and Sedimental Processes to Future Climate Change in Watersheds with Different Landscapes in the Yellow River Basin, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-16, October.
    12. Vartika Paliwal & Aniruddha D. Ghare & Ashwini B. Mirajkar & Neeraj Dhanraj Bokde & Andrés Elías Feijóo Lorenzo, 2019. "Computer Modeling for the Operation Optimization of Mula Reservoir, Upper Godavari Basin, India, Using the Jaya Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    13. Walter Gutjahr & Alois Pichler, 2016. "Stochastic multi-objective optimization: a survey on non-scalarizing methods," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 236(2), pages 475-499, January.
    14. Wang Hua & Pang Yong, 2009. "Water Quantity Operation to Achieve Multi-Environmental Goals for a Waterfront Body," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 23(10), pages 1951-1968, August.
    15. Walter J. Gutjahr & Alois Pichler, 2016. "Stochastic multi-objective optimization: a survey on non-scalarizing methods," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 236(2), pages 475-499, January.
    16. Chao-Chung Yang & Liang-Cheng Chang & Chang-Shian Chen & Ming-Sheng Yeh, 2009. "Multi-objective Planning for Conjunctive Use of Surface and Subsurface Water Using Genetic Algorithm and Dynamics Programming," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 23(3), pages 417-437, February.
    17. Yongqi Liu & Hui Qin & Li Mo & Yongqiang Wang & Duan Chen & Shusen Pang & Xingli Yin, 2019. "Hierarchical Flood Operation Rules Optimization Using Multi-Objective Cultured Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(1), pages 337-354, January.
    18. Zhou, Jianzhong & Zhang, Yongchuan & Zhang, Rui & Ouyang, Shuo & Wang, Xuemin & Liao, Xiang, 2015. "Integrated optimization of hydroelectric energy in the upper and middle Yangtze River," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 481-512.
    19. Dongyang Han & Guanghui Lv & Xuemin He, 2022. "A Research on the Ecological Operation of Reservoirs Based on the Indicators of Hydrological Alteration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-13, May.
    20. J. Yazdi, 2018. "Improving Urban Drainage Systems Resiliency Against Unexpected Blockages: A Probabilistic Approach," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(14), pages 4561-4573, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:36:y:2022:i:9:d:10.1007_s11269-022-03191-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.