IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i2p604-d1024976.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Objective Optimal Long-Term Operation of Cascade Hydropower for Multi-Market Portfolio and Energy Stored at End of Year

Author

Listed:
  • Haojianxiong Yu

    (Institute of Hydropower & Hydro informatics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China)

  • Jianjian Shen

    (Institute of Hydropower & Hydro informatics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China)

  • Chuntian Cheng

    (Institute of Hydropower & Hydro informatics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China)

  • Jia Lu

    (China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd., Yichang 443133, China)

  • Huaxiang Cai

    (Kunming Power Exchange Center, Kunming 650011, China)

Abstract

Taking into account both market benefits and power grid demand is one of the main challenges for cascade hydropower stations trading on electricity markets and secluding operation plan. This study develops a multi-objective optimal operation model for the long-term operation of cascade hydropower in different markets. Two objectives were formulated for economics benefits and carryover energy storage. One was to maximize the market utility value based on portfolio theory, for which conditional value at risk (CVaR) was applied to measure the risk of multi-markets. Another was the maximization of energy storage at the end of a year. The model was solved efficiently through a multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO). Under the framework of the MOPSO, the chaotic mutation search mechanism and elite individual retention mechanism were introduced to diversify and accelerate the non-inferior solution sets. Lastly, a dynamic updating of archives was established to collect the non-inferior solution. The proposed model was implemented on the hydropower plants on the Lancang River, which traded on the Yunnan Electricity Market (YEM). The results demonstrated non-inferior solution sets in wet, normal and dry years. A comparison in solution sets revealed an imbalanced mutual restriction between objectives, such that a 2.65 billion CNY increase in market utility costs a 13.96 billion kWh decrease in energy storage. In addition, the non-inferior solution provided various schemes for actual demands based on other evaluating indexes such as the minimum output, power generation and spillage.

Suggested Citation

  • Haojianxiong Yu & Jianjian Shen & Chuntian Cheng & Jia Lu & Huaxiang Cai, 2023. "Multi-Objective Optimal Long-Term Operation of Cascade Hydropower for Multi-Market Portfolio and Energy Stored at End of Year," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-21, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:2:p:604-:d:1024976
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/2/604/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/2/604/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Yuanyuan & Zhao, Huiru & Li, Bingkang & Zhao, Yihang & Qi, Ze, 2022. "Research on credit rating and risk measurement of electricity retailers based on Bayesian Best Worst Method-Cloud Model and improved Credit Metrics model in China's power market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    2. Cheng, Chun-Tian & Shen, Jian-Jian & Wu, Xin-Yu & Chau, Kwok-wing, 2012. "Operation challenges for fast-growing China's hydropower systems and respondence to energy saving and emission reduction," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 2386-2393.
    3. White, Halbert & Kim, Tae-Hwan & Manganelli, Simone, 2015. "VAR for VaR: Measuring tail dependence using multivariate regression quantiles," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 187(1), pages 169-188.
    4. M. Reddy & D. Kumar, 2006. "Optimal Reservoir Operation Using Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 20(6), pages 861-878, December.
    5. Markowitz, Harry M, 1991. "Foundations of Portfolio Theory," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 46(2), pages 469-477, June.
    6. Shen, Jianjian & Cheng, Chuntian & Wang, Sen & Yuan, Xiaoye & Sun, Lifei & Zhang, Jun, 2020. "Multiobjective optimal operations for an interprovincial hydropower system considering peak-shaving demands," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    7. Philippe Artzner & Freddy Delbaen & Jean‐Marc Eber & David Heath, 1999. "Coherent Measures of Risk," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(3), pages 203-228, July.
    8. Bin Luo & Shumin Miao & Chuntian Cheng & Yi Lei & Gang Chen & Lang Gao, 2019. "Long-Term Generation Scheduling for Cascade Hydropower Plants Considering Price Correlation between Multiple Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-17, June.
    9. Rockafellar, R. Tyrrell & Uryasev, Stanislav, 2002. "Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(7), pages 1443-1471, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rockafellar, R. Tyrrell & Uryasev, Stan & Zabarankin, Michael, 2006. "Master funds in portfolio analysis with general deviation measures," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 743-778, February.
    2. Cui, Xueting & Zhu, Shushang & Sun, Xiaoling & Li, Duan, 2013. "Nonlinear portfolio selection using approximate parametric Value-at-Risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 2124-2139.
    3. Malavasi, Matteo & Ortobelli Lozza, Sergio & Trück, Stefan, 2021. "Second order of stochastic dominance efficiency vs mean variance efficiency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(3), pages 1192-1206.
    4. Rostagno, Luciano Martin, 2005. "Empirical tests of parametric and non-parametric Value-at-Risk (VaR) and Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) measures for the Brazilian stock market index," ISU General Staff Papers 2005010108000021878, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    5. Alois Pichler, 2013. "Premiums And Reserves, Adjusted By Distortions," Papers 1304.0490, arXiv.org.
    6. Alexander, Gordon J. & Baptista, Alexandre M. & Yan, Shu, 2013. "A comparison of the original and revised Basel market risk frameworks for regulating bank capital," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 249-268.
    7. David Neděla & Sergio Ortobelli & Tomáš Tichý, 2024. "Mean–variance vs trend–risk portfolio selection," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(7), pages 2047-2078, July.
    8. Alexander, Gordon J. & Baptista, Alexandre M. & Yan, Shu, 2012. "When more is less: Using multiple constraints to reduce tail risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 2693-2716.
    9. Kull, Andreas, 2009. "Sharing Risk – An Economic Perspective," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(2), pages 591-613, November.
    10. Nan Zhang & Heng Xu, 2024. "Fairness of Ratemaking for Catastrophe Insurance: Lessons from Machine Learning," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 469-488, June.
    11. Curtis, John & Lynch, Muireann Á. & Zubiate, Laura, 2016. "The impact of the North Atlantic Oscillation on electricity markets: A case study on Ireland," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 186-198.
    12. Gauvin, Charles & Delage, Erick & Gendreau, Michel, 2017. "Decision rule approximations for the risk averse reservoir management problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 317-336.
    13. Brian Tomlin & Yimin Wang, 2005. "On the Value of Mix Flexibility and Dual Sourcing in Unreliable Newsvendor Networks," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 7(1), pages 37-57, June.
    14. Yao, Haixiang & Huang, Jinbo & Li, Yong & Humphrey, Jacquelyn E., 2021. "A general approach to smooth and convex portfolio optimization using lower partial moments," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    15. Alexander, Gordon J. & Baptista, Alexandre M. & Yan, Shu, 2014. "Bank regulation and international financial stability: A case against the 2006 Basel framework for controlling tail risk in trading books," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 107-130.
    16. Branda, Martin, 2013. "Diversification-consistent data envelopment analysis with general deviation measures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(3), pages 626-635.
    17. Frantisek Cech & Jozef Barunik, 2017. "Measurement of Common Risk Factors: A Panel Quantile Regression Model for Returns," Working Papers IES 2017/20, Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, revised Sep 2017.
    18. Giovanni Paolo Crespi & Elisa Mastrogiacomo, 2020. "Qualitative robustness of set-valued value-at-risk," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 91(1), pages 25-54, February.
    19. Kolos Ágoston, 2012. "CVaR minimization by the SRA algorithm," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 20(4), pages 623-632, December.
    20. Arouri, Mohamed & M’saddek, Oussama & Nguyen, Duc Khuong & Pukthuanthong, Kuntara, 2019. "Cojumps and asset allocation in international equity markets," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 1-22.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:2:p:604-:d:1024976. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.