IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v35y2021i11d10.1007_s11269-021-02912-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Increasing Water System Robustness in the Netherlands: Potential of Cross-Sectoral Water Reuse

Author

Listed:
  • G. J. Pronk

    (KWR Water Research Institute)

  • S. F. Stofberg

    (KWR Water Research Institute)

  • T. C. G. W. Dooren

    (KWR Water Research Institute)

  • M. M. L. Dingemans

    (KWR Water Research Institute
    Utrecht University)

  • J. Frijns

    (KWR Water Research Institute)

  • N. E. Koeman-Stein

    (KWR Water Research Institute)

  • P. W. M. H. Smeets

    (KWR Water Research Institute)

  • R. P. Bartholomeus

    (KWR Water Research Institute
    Wageningen University & Research)

Abstract

Water reuse has the potential to substantially reduce the demand on groundwater and surface water. This study presents a method to evaluate the potential of water reuse schemes in a regional context and demonstrates how water reuse propagates through the water system and potentially reduces pressure on groundwater resources. The use of Sankey diagram visualisation provides a valuable tool to explore and evaluate regional application of water reuse, its potential to reduce groundwater and surface water demand, and the possible synergies and trade-offs between sectors. The approach is demonstrated for the Dutch anthropogenic water system in the current situation and for a future scenario with increased water demand and reduced water availability due to climate change. Four types of water reuse are evaluated by theoretically upscaling local or regional water reuse schemes based on local reuse examples currently in operation in the Netherlands or Flanders: municipal and industrial wastewater effluent reuse for irrigation, effluent reuse for industrial applications, and reuse for groundwater replenishment. In all cases, water reuse has the potential to significantly reduce groundwater extraction volume, and thus to alleviate the pressure on the groundwater system. The water-quantity based analysis is placed in the context of water quality demands, health and safety aspects, technological requirements, regulations, public perception, and its net impact on the environment. This integrative context is essential for a successful implementation of water reuse in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • G. J. Pronk & S. F. Stofberg & T. C. G. W. Dooren & M. M. L. Dingemans & J. Frijns & N. E. Koeman-Stein & P. W. M. H. Smeets & R. P. Bartholomeus, 2021. "Increasing Water System Robustness in the Netherlands: Potential of Cross-Sectoral Water Reuse," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(11), pages 3721-3735, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:35:y:2021:i:11:d:10.1007_s11269-021-02912-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-021-02912-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-021-02912-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-021-02912-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jack E. Beard & Marc F.P. Bierkens & Ruud P. Bartholomeus, 2019. "Following the Water: Characterising de facto Wastewater Reuse in Agriculture in the Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Kelly S. Fielding & Sara Dolnicar & Tracy Schultz, 2019. "Public acceptance of recycled water," International Journal of Water Resources Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 551-586, July.
    3. Inge E. M. Graaf & Tom Gleeson & L. P. H. (Rens) van Beek & Edwin H. Sutanudjaja & Marc F. P. Bierkens, 2019. "Environmental flow limits to global groundwater pumping," Nature, Nature, vol. 574(7776), pages 90-94, October.
    4. Ritsche A. Kloosterman & Jan Peter Hoek & Paulien Herder, 2021. "Resilient Drinking Water Resources," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(1), pages 337-351, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sheng, Jichuan & Cheng, Qian & Yang, Hongqiang, 2024. "Water markets and water inequality: China's water rights trading pilot," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    2. Tang, Darrell W.S. & Bartholomeus, Ruud P. & Ritsema, Coen J., 2024. "Wastewater irrigation beneath the water table: analytical model of crop contamination risks," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Berthold, Anne & Cologna, Viktoria & Siegrist, Michael, 2022. "The influence of scarcity perception on people's pro-environmental behavior and their readiness to accept new sustainable technologies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    2. Rathore, Vijay Singh & Nathawat, Narayan Singh & Bhardwaj, Seema & Yadav, Bhagirath Mal & Santra, Priyabrata & Kumar, Mahesh & Shekhawat, Ravindra Singh & Reager, Madan Lal & Yadav, Shish Ram & Lal, B, 2022. "Alternative cropping systems and optimized management practices for saving groundwater and enhancing economic and environmental sustainability," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    3. Erika Allen Wolters & Brent S. Steel & Muhammed Usman Amin Siddiqi & Melissa Symmes, 2022. "Public Water Policy Knowledge and Policy Preferences in the American West," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-20, February.
    4. Li, Pei & Ren, Li, 2023. "Evaluating the differences in irrigation methods for winter wheat under limited irrigation quotas in the water-food-economy nexus in the North China Plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    5. Tang, Darrell W.S. & Bartholomeus, Ruud P. & Ritsema, Coen J., 2024. "Wastewater irrigation beneath the water table: analytical model of crop contamination risks," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    6. Duong Hai Ha & Phong Tung Nguyen & Romulus Costache & Nadhir Al-Ansari & Tran Phong & Huu Duy Nguyen & Mahdis Amiri & Rohit Sharma & Indra Prakash & Hiep Le & Hanh Bich Thi Nguyen & Binh Thai Pham, 2021. "Quadratic Discriminant Analysis Based Ensemble Machine Learning Models for Groundwater Potential Modeling and Mapping," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(13), pages 4415-4433, October.
    7. James, Christina Anne & Kavanagh, Marie & Manton, Carl & Soar, Jeffrey, 2023. "Revisiting recycled water for the next drought; a case study of South East Queensland, Australia," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    8. Ruby Moynihan & Bjørn-Oliver Magsig, 2020. "The role of international regimes and courts in clarifying prevention of harm in freshwater and marine environmental protection," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 649-666, December.
    9. Klara Ramm & Marzena Smol, 2023. "Water Reuse—Analysis of the Possibility of Using Reclaimed Water Depending on the Quality Class in the European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-18, August.
    10. Guobin Fu & Stephanie R. Clark & Dennis Gonzalez & Rodrigo Rojas & Sreekanth Janardhanan, 2023. "Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Groundwater Levels: A Case Study of Alluvial Aquifers in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-18, November.
    11. Hu, Han-fen & Krishen, Anjala S. & Barnes, Jesse, 2023. "Through narratives we learn: Exploring knowledge-building as a marketing strategy for prosocial water reuse," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    12. Hans Jørgen Henriksen & Lars Troldborg & Maria Ondracek, 2024. "Model and Ensemble Indicator-Guided Assessment of Robust, Exploitable Groundwater Resources for Denmark," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-24, November.
    13. Tsigkou, Stavroula & Messer, Kent D. & Kecinski, Maik & Li, Tongzhe, 2021. "The impact of nontraditional irrigation water on consumers’ perception of food and non-food items: A field experiment in the United States," 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas 313940, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    14. Jesse L. Barnes & Anjala S. Krishen & Han-fen Hu, 2021. "Untapped Knowledge about Water Reuse: the Roles of Direct and Indirect Educational Messaging," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(8), pages 2601-2615, June.
    15. Ilan Stavi & Anastasia Paschalidou & Apostolos P. Kyriazopoulos & Rares Halbac-Cotoara-Zamfir & Si Mokrane Siad & Malgorzata Suska-Malawska & Dragisa Savic & Joana Roque de Pinho & Lisa Thalheimer & D, 2021. "Multidimensional Food Security Nexus in Drylands under the Slow Onset Effects of Climate Change," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-14, December.
    16. Libor Ansorge & Lada Stejskalová, 2022. "Water Footprint as a Tool for Selection of Alternatives (Comments on “Food Recommendations for Reducing Water Footprint”)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-8, May.
    17. Gao, Fei & Sun, Shikun & Yao, Ning & Yang, Huicai & Cheng, Bingfen & Luan, Xiaobo & Wang, Kaixuan, 2022. "Identifying the impact of crop distribution on groundwater resources carrying capacity in groundwater-depended agricultural regions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    18. Alex Segrè Cohen & Nancy G. Love & Joseph Árvai, 2020. "Communicating the Risks and Benefits of Human Urine-Derived Fertilizer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-14, November.
    19. Nilsson, David & Karpouzoglou, Timos & Wallin, Jörgen & Blomkvist, Pär & Golzar, Farzin & Martin, Viktoria, 2023. "Is on-property heat and greywater recovery a sustainable option? A quantitative and qualitative assessment up to 2050," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    20. Piero Morseletto & Caro Eline Mooren & Stefania Munaretto, 2022. "Circular Economy of Water: Definition, Strategies and Challenges," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(4), pages 1463-1477, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:35:y:2021:i:11:d:10.1007_s11269-021-02912-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.