IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v303y2024ics0378377424003718.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating irrigation water use from remotely sensed evapotranspiration data: Accuracy and uncertainties at field, water right, and regional scales

Author

Listed:
  • Zipper, Sam
  • Kastens, Jude
  • Foster, Timothy
  • Wilson, Blake B.
  • Melton, Forrest
  • Grinstead, Ashley
  • Deines, Jillian M.
  • Butler, James J.
  • Marston, Landon T.

Abstract

Irrigated agriculture is the dominant user of water globally, but most water withdrawals are not monitored or reported. As a result, it is largely unknown when, where, and how much water is used for irrigation. Here, we evaluated the ability of remotely sensed evapotranspiration (ET) data, integrated with other datasets, to calculate irrigation water withdrawals and applications in an intensively irrigated portion of the United States. We compared irrigation calculations based on an ensemble of satellite-driven ET models from OpenET with reported groundwater withdrawals from hundreds of farmer irrigation application records and a statewide flowmeter database at three spatial scales (field, water right group, and management area). At the field scale, we found that ET-based calculations of irrigation agreed best with reported irrigation when the OpenET ensemble mean was aggregated to the growing season timescale (bias = 1.6–4.9 %, R2 = 0.53–0.74), and agreement between calculated and reported irrigation was better for multi-year averages than for individual years. At the water right group scale, linking pumping wells to specific irrigated fields was the primary source of uncertainty. At the management area scale, calculated irrigation exhibited similar temporal patterns as flowmeter data but tended to be positively biased with more interannual variability. Disagreement between calculated and reported irrigation was strongly correlated with annual precipitation, and calculated and reported irrigation agreed more closely after statistically adjusting for annual precipitation. The selection of an ET model was also an important consideration, as variability across ET models was larger than the potential impacts of conservation measures employed in the region. From these results, we suggest key practices for working with ET-based irrigation data that include accurately accounting for changes in soil moisture, deep percolation, and runoff; careful verification of irrigated area and well-field linkages; and conducting application-specific evaluations of uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Zipper, Sam & Kastens, Jude & Foster, Timothy & Wilson, Blake B. & Melton, Forrest & Grinstead, Ashley & Deines, Jillian M. & Butler, James J. & Marston, Landon T., 2024. "Estimating irrigation water use from remotely sensed evapotranspiration data: Accuracy and uncertainties at field, water right, and regional scales," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:303:y:2024:i:c:s0378377424003718
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377424003718
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109036?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Deines, Jillian M. & Schipanski, Meagan E. & Golden, Bill & Zipper, Samuel C. & Nozari, Soheil & Rottler, Caitlin & Guerrero, Bridget & Sharda, Vaishali, 2020. "Transitions from irrigated to dryland agriculture in the Ogallala Aquifer: Land use suitability and regional economic impacts," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    2. MardanDoost, B. & Brookfield, A.E. & Feddema, J. & Sturm, B. & Kastens, J. & Peterson, D. & Bishop, C., 2019. "Estimating irrigation demand with geospatial and in-situ data: Application to the high plains aquifer, Kansas, USA," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Folhes, M.T. & Rennó, C.D. & Soares, J.V., 2009. "Remote sensing for irrigation water management in the semi-arid Northeast of Brazil," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(10), pages 1398-1408, October.
    4. Inge E. M. Graaf & Tom Gleeson & L. P. H. (Rens) van Beek & Edwin H. Sutanudjaja & Marc F. P. Bierkens, 2019. "Environmental flow limits to global groundwater pumping," Nature, Nature, vol. 574(7776), pages 90-94, October.
    5. Arnald Puy & Emanuele Borgonovo & Samuele Lo Piano & Simon A. Levin & Andrea Saltelli, 2021. "Irrigated areas drive irrigation water withdrawals," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Allen, Richard G. & Pereira, Luis S. & Howell, Terry A. & Jensen, Marvin E., 2011. "Evapotranspiration information reporting: I. Factors governing measurement accuracy," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(6), pages 899-920, April.
    7. Laluet, Pierre & Olivera-Guerra, Luis Enrique & Altés, Víctor & Paolini, Giovanni & Ouaadi, Nadia & Rivalland, Vincent & Jarlan, Lionel & Villar, Josep Maria & Merlin, Olivier, 2024. "Retrieving the irrigation actually applied at district scale: Assimilating high-resolution Sentinel-1-derived soil moisture data into a FAO-56-based model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    8. Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Jovanovic, N., 2020. "Soil water balance models for determining crop water and irrigation requirements and irrigation scheduling focusing on the FAO56 method and the dual Kc approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    9. Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Melton, F. & Johnson, L. & Wang, T. & López-Urrea, R. & Cancela, J.J. & Allen, R.G., 2020. "Prediction of crop coefficients from fraction of ground cover and height. Background and validation using ground and remote sensing data," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    10. Dhungel, Ramesh & Aiken, Robert & Lin, Xiaomao & Kenyon, Shannon & Colaizzi, Paul D. & Luhman, Ray & Baumhardt, R. Louis & O’Brien, Dan & Kutikoff, Seth & Brauer, David K., 2020. "Restricted water allocations: Landscape-scale energy balance simulations and adjustments in agricultural water applications," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    11. Carole Dalin & Yoshihide Wada & Thomas Kastner & Michael J. Puma, 2017. "Groundwater depletion embedded in international food trade," Nature, Nature, vol. 543(7647), pages 700-704, March.
    12. Drysdale, Krystal M. & Hendricks, Nathan P., 2018. "Adaptation to an irrigation water restriction imposed through local governance," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 150-165.
    13. Dietrich Earnhart & Nathan P. Hendricks, 2023. "Adapting to water restrictions: Intensive versus extensive adaptation over time differentiated by water right seniority," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(5), pages 1458-1490, October.
    14. Whittemore, Donald O. & Butler, James J. & Bohling, Geoffrey C. & Wilson, Blake B., 2023. "Are we saving water? Simple methods for assessing the effectiveness of groundwater conservation measures," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    15. Md Fahim Hasan & Ryan Smith & Sanaz Vajedian & Rahel Pommerenke & Sayantan Majumdar, 2023. "Global land subsidence mapping reveals widespread loss of aquifer storage capacity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    16. Scott Jasechko & Hansjörg Seybold & Debra Perrone & Ying Fan & Mohammad Shamsudduha & Richard G. Taylor & Othman Fallatah & James W. Kirchner, 2024. "Rapid groundwater decline and some cases of recovery in aquifers globally," Nature, Nature, vol. 625(7996), pages 715-721, January.
    17. Filippelli, Steven K. & Sloggy, Matthew R. & Vogeler, Jody C. & Manning, Dale T. & Goemans, Christopher & Senay, Gabriel B., 2022. "Remote sensing of field-scale irrigation withdrawals in the central Ogallala aquifer region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    18. Paolini, Giovanni & Escorihuela, Maria Jose & Merlin, Olivier & Laluet, Pierre & Bellvert, Joaquim & Pellarin, Thierry, 2023. "Estimating multi-scale irrigation amounts using multi-resolution soil moisture data: A data-driven approach using PrISM," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ott, Thomas J. & Majumdar, Sayantan & Huntington, Justin L. & Pearson, Christopher & Bromley, Matt & Minor, Blake A. & ReVelle, Peter & Morton, Charles G. & Sueki, Sachiko & Beamer, Jordan P. & Jasoni, 2024. "Toward field-scale groundwater pumping and improved groundwater management using remote sensing and climate data," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    2. Darouich, Hanaa & Karfoul, Razan & Ramos, Tiago B. & Moustafa, Ali & Shaheen, Baraa & Pereira, Luis S., 2021. "Crop water requirements and crop coefficients for jute mallow (Corchorus olitorius L.) using the SIMDualKc model and assessing irrigation strategies for the Syrian Akkar region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    3. Liu, Meihan & Paredes, Paula & Shi, Haibin & Ramos, Tiago B. & Dou, Xu & Dai, Liping & Pereira, Luis S., 2022. "Impacts of a shallow saline water table on maize evapotranspiration and groundwater contribution using static water table lysimeters and the dual Kc water balance model SIMDualKc," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    4. Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Hunsaker, D.J. & López-Urrea, R. & Mohammadi Shad, Z., 2021. "Standard single and basal crop coefficients for field crops. Updates and advances to the FAO56 crop water requirements method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    5. Lankford, Bruce A., 2023. "Resolving the paradoxes of irrigation efficiency: Irrigated systems accounting analyses depletion-based water conservation for reallocation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    6. Filippelli, Steven K. & Sloggy, Matthew R. & Vogeler, Jody C. & Manning, Dale T. & Goemans, Christopher & Senay, Gabriel B., 2022. "Remote sensing of field-scale irrigation withdrawals in the central Ogallala aquifer region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    7. Ramos, Tiago B. & Darouich, Hanaa & Oliveira, Ana R. & Farzamian, Mohammad & Monteiro, Tomás & Castanheira, Nádia & Paz, Ana & Gonçalves, Maria C. & Pereira, Luís S., 2023. "Water use and soil water balance of Mediterranean tree crops assessed with the SIMDualKc model in orchards of southern Portugal," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    8. Silva, Simão P. & Valín, M. Isabel & Mendes, Susana & Araujo-Paredes, Claúdio & Cancela, Javier J., 2024. "Water productivity in Vitis vinifera L. cv. Alvarinho using dual crop coefficient approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    9. Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & López-Urrea, R. & Hunsaker, D.J. & Mota, M. & Mohammadi Shad, Z., 2021. "Standard single and basal crop coefficients for vegetable crops, an update of FAO56 crop water requirements approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    10. Rallo, G. & Paço, T.A. & Paredes, P. & Puig-Sirera, À. & Massai, R. & Provenzano, G. & Pereira, L.S., 2021. "Updated single and dual crop coefficients for tree and vine fruit crops," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    11. Dietrich Earnhart & Nathan P. Hendricks, 2023. "Adapting to water restrictions: Intensive versus extensive adaptation over time differentiated by water right seniority," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(5), pages 1458-1490, October.
    12. Jaime Martínez-Valderrama & Jorge Olcina & Gonzalo Delacámara & Emilio Guirado & Fernando T. Maestre, 2023. "Complex Policy Mixes are Needed to Cope with Agricultural Water Demands Under Climate Change," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(6), pages 2805-2834, May.
    13. Gao, Fei & Sun, Shikun & Yao, Ning & Yang, Huicai & Cheng, Bingfen & Luan, Xiaobo & Wang, Kaixuan, 2022. "Identifying the impact of crop distribution on groundwater resources carrying capacity in groundwater-depended agricultural regions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    14. Jovanovic, N. & Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Pôças, I. & Cantore, V. & Todorovic, M., 2020. "A review of strategies, methods and technologies to reduce non-beneficial consumptive water use on farms considering the FAO56 methods," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    15. Li, Pei & Ren, Li, 2023. "Evaluating the differences in irrigation methods for winter wheat under limited irrigation quotas in the water-food-economy nexus in the North China Plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    16. Liu, Meihan & Shi, Haibin & Paredes, Paula & Ramos, Tiago B. & Dai, Liping & Feng, Zhuangzhuang & Pereira, Luis S., 2022. "Estimating and partitioning maize evapotranspiration as affected by salinity using weighing lysimeters and the SIMDualKc model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    17. Ramos, Tiago B. & Oliveira, Ana R. & Darouich, Hanaa & Gonçalves, Maria C. & Martínez-Moreno, Francisco J. & Rodríguez, Mario Ramos & Vanderlinden, Karl & Farzamian, Mohammad, 2023. "Field-scale assessment of soil water dynamics using distributed modeling and electromagnetic conductivity imaging," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    18. Qiu, Rangjian & Li, Longan & Liu, Chunwei & Wang, Zhenchang & Zhang, Baozhong & Liu, Zhandong, 2022. "Evapotranspiration estimation using a modified crop coefficient model in a rotated rice-winter wheat system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    19. Shao, Guomin & Han, Wenting & Zhang, Huihui & Zhang, Liyuan & Wang, Yi & Zhang, Yu, 2023. "Prediction of maize crop coefficient from UAV multisensor remote sensing using machine learning methods," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    20. Hans Jørgen Henriksen & Lars Troldborg & Maria Ondracek, 2024. "Model and Ensemble Indicator-Guided Assessment of Robust, Exploitable Groundwater Resources for Denmark," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-24, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:303:y:2024:i:c:s0378377424003718. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.