IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v272y2022ics0378377422003870.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Alternative cropping systems and optimized management practices for saving groundwater and enhancing economic and environmental sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Rathore, Vijay Singh
  • Nathawat, Narayan Singh
  • Bhardwaj, Seema
  • Yadav, Bhagirath Mal
  • Santra, Priyabrata
  • Kumar, Mahesh
  • Shekhawat, Ravindra Singh
  • Reager, Madan Lal
  • Yadav, Shish Ram
  • Lal, Banwari
  • Yadava, Narendra Dev
  • Singh, Jai Prakash
  • Kumar, Praveen
  • Bhaskar, Suryanarayan
  • Yadav, Om Parkash

Abstract

Rapid decline in groundwater table due to excessive withdrawal of water for irrigation has been posing a serious threat to sustainable agricultural production in hot arid region of India. Alternative cropping systems having low irrigation requirement have been proposed to resolve unsustainable groundwater use but trade-off with other dimensions such as yield, profitability, and environmental impacts is not well-documented. An integrated analysis of amount of groundwater use, productivity, profitability, resource-use efficiency (RUE), and environmental impacts of three cluster bean-based cropping systems [conventional cluster bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba)–wheat (Triticum aestivum) (CB–W), and two alternative cropping systems, namely cluster bean-Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) (CB–IM) and cluster bean–blond psyllium (Plantago ovata) (CB–BP)] under different soil management practices [two tillage types, i.e., conventional (CT), and deep tillage (DT); and three farmyard manure (FYM) application rates, i.e., 0, 5, 10 Mg ha-1] was carried out. Based on a three-year field experiment, compared to conventional CB–W, alternative cropping systems produced 28.6–47.4 % lower seed yield, but enhanced economic returns (7.6–31.1 %), while reduced amount of irrigation (− 27.9 to − 37.2 %), energy (− 22.4 to − 37.0 %), and nutrient (− 17.4 to − 46.1 %) used, global warming potential (− 20.2 to − 45.9 %) and greenhouse gas intensity (− 27.3 to − 57.7 %). Alternative cropping systems saved 1.87–2.50 × 103 m3 per year per hectare of groundwater than conventional cropping systems. Soil management practices influenced agro-economic and environmental dimensions of cropping systems. Deep tillage (DT) enhanced yield (14.0 %), economic profit (18.8 %), RUE (13.2 %, 13.8 % and 8.5 % for nutrient, water and energy use efficiency, respectively). Addition of FYM increased yield (up to 23.0 %), economic net return (up to 21.8 %), RUE (up to 22.7 %, 16.5 %, 91.0 % in water, energy and nutrient use efficiency), and reduced global warming potential (up to − 7.9 %). The CB-BP cropping system with DT and FYM addition offered the best balance of yield, profit, saving of irrigation water, energy and nutrient, while minimizing GWP. This study provides empirical evidence of the opportunities for alternative cropping systems which balance the multiple objectives of sustainable groundwater use, farmer profitability and environmental sustainability for arid region of India. The results have direct implications for sustainable utilization of underground water for similar regions of the world facing water shortage.

Suggested Citation

  • Rathore, Vijay Singh & Nathawat, Narayan Singh & Bhardwaj, Seema & Yadav, Bhagirath Mal & Santra, Priyabrata & Kumar, Mahesh & Shekhawat, Ravindra Singh & Reager, Madan Lal & Yadav, Shish Ram & Lal, B, 2022. "Alternative cropping systems and optimized management practices for saving groundwater and enhancing economic and environmental sustainability," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:272:y:2022:i:c:s0378377422003870
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107840
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377422003870
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107840?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Linlin & Li, Qiang & Coulter, Jeffrey A. & Xie, Junhong & Luo, Zhuzhu & Zhang, Renzhi & Deng, Xiping & Li, Linglin, 2020. "Winter wheat yield and water use efficiency response to organic fertilization in northern China: A meta-analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    2. Sun, Qinping & Kröbel, Roland & Müller, Torsten & Römheld, Volker & Cui, Zhenling & Zhang, Fusuo & Chen, Xinping, 2011. "Optimization of yield and water-use of different cropping systems for sustainable groundwater use in North China Plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(5), pages 808-814, March.
    3. J. S. Famiglietti, 2014. "The global groundwater crisis," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 4(11), pages 945-948, November.
    4. Lorenzo Rosa & Maria Cristina Rulli & Saleem Ali & Davide Danilo Chiarelli & Jampel Dell’Angelo & Nathaniel D. Mueller & Arnim Scheidel & Giuseppina Siciliano & Paolo D’Odorico, 2021. "Energy implications of the 21st century agrarian transition," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-9, December.
    5. Inge E. M. Graaf & Tom Gleeson & L. P. H. (Rens) van Beek & Edwin H. Sutanudjaja & Marc F. P. Bierkens, 2019. "Environmental flow limits to global groundwater pumping," Nature, Nature, vol. 574(7776), pages 90-94, October.
    6. Rathore, Vijay Singh & Nathawat, Narayan Singh & Bhardwaj, Seema & Sasidharan, Renjith Puthiyedathu & Yadav, Bhagirath Mal & Kumar, Mahesh & Santra, Priyabrata & Yadava, Narendra Dev & Yadav, Om Parka, 2017. "Yield, water and nitrogen use efficiencies of sprinkler irrigated wheat grown under different irrigation and nitrogen levels in an arid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 232-245.
    7. Lorenzo Rosa & Maria Cristina Rulli & Saleem Ali & Davide Danilo Chiarelli & Jampel Dell’Angelo & Nathaniel D. Mueller & Arnim Scheidel & Giuseppina Siciliano & Paolo D’Odorico, 2021. "Author Correction: Energy implications of the 21st century agrarian transition," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-1, December.
    8. Luo, Jianmei & Shen, Yanjun & Qi, Yongqing & Zhang, Yucui & Xiao, Dengpan, 2018. "Evaluating water conservation effects due to cropping system optimization on the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei plain, China," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 32-41.
    9. Kumar, Praduman & Joshi, P.K. & Birthal, Pratap Singh, 2009. "Demand Projections for Foodgrains in India," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 22(2), July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul Steenwyk & Matthew Kuperus Heun & Paul Brockway & Tânia Sousa & Sofia Henriques, 2022. "The Contributions of Muscle and Machine Work to Land and Labor Productivity in World Agriculture Since 1800," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Huang, Jing & Han, Wenjing & Zhang, Zhengfeng & Ning, Shanshan & Zhang, Xiaoling, 2024. "The decoupling relationship between land use efficiency and carbon emissions in China: An analysis using the Socio-Ecological Systems (SES) framework," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    3. Zhao, Jie & Zhang, Xuepeng & Yang, Yadong & Zang, Huadong & Yan, Peng & Meki, Manyowa N. & Doro, Luca & Sui, Peng & Jeong, Jaehak & Zeng, Zhaohai, 2021. "Alternative cropping systems for groundwater irrigation sustainability in the North China Plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    4. Yang, Lei & Fang, Xiangyang & Zhou, Jie & Zhao, Jie & Hou, Xiqing & Yang, Yadong & Zang, Huadong & Zeng, Zhaohai, 2024. "Optimal irrigation for wheat-maize rotation depending on precipitation in the North China Plain: Evidence from a four-year experiment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    5. Choi, Chong Seok & Ravi, Sujith & Siregar, Iskandar Z. & Dwiyanti, Fifi Gus & Macknick, Jordan & Elchinger, Michael & Davatzes, Nicholas C., 2021. "Combined land use of solar infrastructure and agriculture for socioeconomic and environmental co-benefits in the tropics," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    6. Luo, Jianmei & Zhang, Hongmei & Qi, Yongqing & Pei, Hongwei & Shen, Yanjun, 2022. "Balancing water and food by optimizing the planting structure in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    7. Sun, Hongyong & Zhang, Xiying & Liu, Xiujing & Liu, Xiuwei & Shao, Liwei & Chen, Suying & Wang, Jintao & Dong, Xinliang, 2019. "Impact of different cropping systems and irrigation schedules on evapotranspiration, grain yield and groundwater level in the North China Plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 202-209.
    8. Zhong, Honglin & Sun, Laixiang & Fischer, Günther & Tian, Zhan & Liang, Zhuoran, 2019. "Optimizing regional cropping systems with a dynamic adaptation strategy for water sustainable agriculture in the Hebei Plain," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 94-106.
    9. Huanyuan Wang & Baoguo Li & Liang Jin & Kelin Hu, 2020. "Exploring a Sustainable Cropping System in the North China Plain Using a Modelling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, June.
    10. Jingxiu Qin & Weili Duan & Shan Zou & Yaning Chen & Wenjing Huang & Lorenzo Rosa, 2024. "Global energy use and carbon emissions from irrigated agriculture," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    11. Guzmán, Gloria Isabel & Fernández, David Soto & Aguilera, Eduardo & Infante-Amate, Juan & de Molina, Manuel González, 2022. "The close relationship between biophysical degradation, ecosystem services and family farms decline in Spanish agriculture (1992–2017)," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    12. Chen, Qiaomin & Liu, Yujie & Ge, Quansheng & Pan, Tao, 2018. "Impacts of historic climate variability and land use change on winter wheat climatic productivity in the North China Plain during 1980–2010," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1-9.
    13. Chinchu Mohan & Andrew W. Western & Madan Kumar Jha & Yongping Wei, 2022. "Global Assessment of Groundwater Stress Vis-à-Vis Sustainability of Irrigated Food Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-15, December.
    14. Wu, Di & Zhang, Taoyuan & Zhang, Jiqiang & Lv, Hongyi & Yue, Chao & Fu, Mengze, 2024. "Sensitivity analysis and multiobjective optimization for rural house retrofitting considering construction and occupant behavior uncertainty: A case study of Jiaxian, China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
    15. Jonathan O. Hernandez, 2022. "Ecophysiological Effects of Groundwater Drawdown on Phreatophytes: Research Trends during the Last Three Decades," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, November.
    16. Xiao, Dengpan & Shen, Yanjun & Qi, Yongqing & Moiwo, Juana P. & Min, Leilei & Zhang, Yucui & Guo, Ying & Pei, Hongwei, 2017. "Impact of alternative cropping systems on groundwater use and grain yields in the North China Plain Region," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 109-117.
    17. Zappa, Luca & Dari, Jacopo & Modanesi, Sara & Quast, Raphael & Brocca, Luca & De Lannoy, Gabrielle & Massari, Christian & Quintana-Seguí, Pere & Barella-Ortiz, Anais & Dorigo, Wouter, 2024. "Benefits and pitfalls of irrigation timing and water amounts derived from satellite soil moisture," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    18. Xiukang Wang, 2022. "Managing Land Carrying Capacity: Key to Achieving Sustainable Production Systems for Food Security," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, March.
    19. Madhumita Sahoo & Aman Kasot & Anirban Dhar & Amlanjyoti Kar, 2018. "On Predictability of Groundwater Level in Shallow Wells Using Satellite Observations," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(4), pages 1225-1244, March.
    20. Wakchaure, G.C. & Minhas, P.S. & Kumar, Satish & Khapte, P.S. & Dalvi, S.G. & Rane, J. & Reddy, K. Sammi, 2023. "Pod quality, yields responses and water productivity of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) as affected by plant growth regulators and deficit irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:272:y:2022:i:c:s0378377422003870. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.