IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v33y2019i2d10.1007_s11269-018-2147-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling Groundwater Quality Parameters Using Hybrid Neuro-Fuzzy Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Ozgur Kisi

    (Ilia State University)

  • Armin Azad

    (Semnan University)

  • Hamed Kashi

    (Technology University of Munich)

  • Amir Saeedian

    (Semnan University)

  • Seyed Ali Asghar Hashemi

    (Agriculture Research and Education Organization - Natural Resources Research Center of Semnan Province)

  • Salar Ghorbani

    (Semnan University)

Abstract

In this study, the application of four evolutionary algorithms, continuous genetic algorithm (CGA), particle swarm optimization (PSO), ant colony optimization for continuous domains (ACOR), and differential evolution (DE) were considered for training and optimization of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) to model groundwater quality variables. At first, using correlation and sensitivity analysis, the best inputs were selected to estimate electrical conductivity (EC), sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) and total hardness (TH). After that, the quality variables were modeled by simple ANFIS and the ANFIS trained by evolutionary algorithms. Finally, the models’ performances were evaluated using determination coefficient (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and sensitivity analysis. Results indicated that: 1) All the suggested algorithms improved the ANFIS performance in the modeling of EC and TH. Also, in SAR, CGA and PSO had a better performance than existing algorithms of ANFIS. 2) CGA with the most appropriate results, was the best algorithm in improving ANFIS performance for modeling the groundwater quality variables such that the amounts of R2, RMSE, and MAPE were improved by 0.14, 35.4, and 0.59 for TH, by 0.13, 226 (μmho Cm−1), 2.16 for EC, and by 0.15, 690, and 19.04 for SAR, respectively. 3) Sensitivity analysis showed that the results obtained by correlation analysis was dependable and could be used as a primary step in choosing the best input data for prediction of groundwater quality variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Ozgur Kisi & Armin Azad & Hamed Kashi & Amir Saeedian & Seyed Ali Asghar Hashemi & Salar Ghorbani, 2019. "Modeling Groundwater Quality Parameters Using Hybrid Neuro-Fuzzy Methods," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(2), pages 847-861, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:33:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s11269-018-2147-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-018-2147-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-018-2147-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-018-2147-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gebdang B. Ruben & Ke Zhang & Hongjun Bao & Xirong Ma, 2018. "Application and Sensitivity Analysis of Artificial Neural Network for Prediction of Chemical Oxygen Demand," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(1), pages 273-283, January.
    2. Masoomeh Mirrashid, 2014. "Earthquake magnitude prediction by adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) based on fuzzy C-means algorithm," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 74(3), pages 1577-1593, December.
    3. Atul Anand & L. Suganthi, 2017. "Forecasting of Electricity Demand by Hybrid ANN-PSO Models," International Journal of Energy Optimization and Engineering (IJEOE), IGI Global, vol. 6(4), pages 66-83, October.
    4. Socha, Krzysztof & Dorigo, Marco, 2008. "Ant colony optimization for continuous domains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(3), pages 1155-1173, March.
    5. Seyed Akrami & Ahmed El-Shafie & Othman Jaafar, 2013. "Improving Rainfall Forecasting Efficiency Using Modified Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (MANFIS)," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(9), pages 3507-3523, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mojtaba Kadkhodazadeh & Saeed Farzin, 2021. "A Novel LSSVM Model Integrated with GBO Algorithm to Assessment of Water Quality Parameters," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(12), pages 3939-3968, September.
    2. Ankita P. Dadhich & Rohit Goyal & Pran N. Dadhich, 2021. "Assessment and Prediction of Groundwater using Geospatial and ANN Modeling," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(9), pages 2879-2893, July.
    3. Naser Shiri & Jalal Shiri & Zaher Mundher Yaseen & Sungwon Kim & Il-Moon Chung & Vahid Nourani & Mohammad Zounemat-Kermani, 2021. "Development of artificial intelligence models for well groundwater quality simulation: Different modeling scenarios," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-24, May.
    4. Dilip Kumar Roy & Kowshik Kumar Saha & Mohammad Kamruzzaman & Sujit Kumar Biswas & Mohammad Anower Hossain, 2021. "Hierarchical Fuzzy Systems Integrated with Particle Swarm Optimization for Daily Reference Evapotranspiration Prediction: a Novel Approach," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(15), pages 5383-5407, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sutapa Chaudhuri & Arumita Roy Chowdhury & Payel Das, 2018. "Implementation of Sugeno: ANFIS for forecasting the seismic moment of large earthquakes over Indo-Himalayan region," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 90(1), pages 391-405, January.
    2. Atul Anand & L Suganthi, 2018. "Hybrid GA-PSO Optimization of Artificial Neural Network for Forecasting Electricity Demand," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Sami Abdullah Osman & Meshal Almoshaogeh & Arshad Jamal & Fawaz Alharbi & Abdulhamid Al Mojil & Muhammad Abubakar Dalhat, 2022. "Intelligent Assessment of Pavement Condition Indices Using Artificial Neural Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-30, December.
    4. Amjad Hudaib & Mohammad Khanafseh & Ola Surakhi, 2018. "An Improved Version of K-medoid Algorithm using CRO," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(2), pages 116-116, February.
    5. Liao, Tianjun & Stützle, Thomas & Montes de Oca, Marco A. & Dorigo, Marco, 2014. "A unified ant colony optimization algorithm for continuous optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(3), pages 597-609.
    6. Kulwinder Parmar & Rashmi Bhardwaj, 2015. "River Water Prediction Modeling Using Neural Networks, Fuzzy and Wavelet Coupled Model," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(1), pages 17-33, January.
    7. Ali Sardar Shahraki & Mohim Tash & Tommaso Caloiero & Ommolbanin Bazrafshan, 2024. "Optimal Allocation of Water Resources Using Agro-Economic Development and Colony Optimization Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-18, July.
    8. Luo, Qifang & Yang, Xiao & Zhou, Yongquan, 2019. "Nature-inspired approach: An enhanced moth swarm algorithm for global optimization," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 57-92.
    9. Suiling Wang & Zhiqiang Jiang & Hairong Zhang, 2022. "Correction of Reservoir Runoff Forecast Based on Multi-scenario Division and Multi Models," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(13), pages 5277-5296, October.
    10. Qiang Yang & Xu Guo & Xu-Dong Gao & Dong-Dong Xu & Zhen-Yu Lu, 2022. "Differential Elite Learning Particle Swarm Optimization for Global Numerical Optimization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-32, April.
    11. Han, Meng & Ding, Lili & Zhao, Xin & Kang, Wanglin, 2019. "Forecasting carbon prices in the Shenzhen market, China: The role of mixed-frequency factors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 69-76.
    12. Hakan Yılmazer & Selma Ayşe Özel, 2024. "Diverse but Relevant Recommendations with Continuous Ant Colony Optimization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-26, August.
    13. Hong, Wei-Chiang, 2010. "Application of chaotic ant swarm optimization in electric load forecasting," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 5830-5839, October.
    14. Gao, Wei-feng & Huang, Ling-ling & Liu, San-yang & Chan, Felix T.S. & Dai, Cai & Shan, Xian, 2015. "Artificial bee colony algorithm with multiple search strategies," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 271(C), pages 269-287.
    15. Ana Maria A. C. Rocha & M. Fernanda P. Costa & Edite M. G. P. Fernandes, 2017. "On a smoothed penalty-based algorithm for global optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 69(3), pages 561-585, November.
    16. K. M. Asim & F. Martínez-Álvarez & A. Basit & T. Iqbal, 2017. "Earthquake magnitude prediction in Hindukush region using machine learning techniques," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 85(1), pages 471-486, January.
    17. Yaroslav Vyklyuk & Milan Radovanović & Boško Milovanović & Taras Leko & Milan Milenković & Zoran Milošević & Ana Milanović Pešić & Dejana Jakovljević, 2017. "Hurricane genesis modelling based on the relationship between solar activity and hurricanes," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 85(2), pages 1043-1062, January.
    18. Li, Yuanmao & Liu, Guixiong & Deng, Wei & Li, Zuyu, 2024. "Comparative study on parameter identification of an electrochemical model for lithium-ion batteries via meta-heuristic methods," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 367(C).
    19. Behzad Ataie-Ashtiani & Hamed Ketabchi, 2011. "Elitist Continuous Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm for Optimal Management of Coastal Aquifers," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 25(1), pages 165-190, January.
    20. Md. Hossain & A. El-shafie, 2013. "Intelligent Systems in Optimizing Reservoir Operation Policy: A Review," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(9), pages 3387-3407, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:33:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s11269-018-2147-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.